Processes for Developing Plain Language Versions of Guidelines Recommendations: A Scoping Review
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print
Document type Journal Article, Scoping Review
Grant support
Agentura Pro Zdravotnický Výzkum Ceské Republiky.
Czech Health Research Council (NU23-09-00328; Methodology of creating plain language recommendations for knowledge translation to support evidence-based decision-making in healthcare in the Czech Republic).
PubMed
40875579
PubMed Central
PMC12393140
DOI
10.1111/jep.70256
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- consumer health information, decision making, guideline as a topic, health education, health knowledge,
- MeSH
- Language * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Practice Guidelines as Topic * standards MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Scoping Review MeSH
RATIONALE: Plain language recommendations (PLRs) offer clear and understandable statements based on trustworthy guidelines. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to synthesise methodological evidence for developing PLRs in the health care context. METHODS: We followed the JBI methodology for scoping review development and the PRISMA-ScR guidelines for scoping review reporting. PLRs in the context of health care guidelines or patient versions of guidelines were included. A systematic search was run in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and the repositories of guideline developers until November 2023. Due to the research´s longitudinal nature, the search was updated in May 2025 to verify findings gathered so far. Reviewers extracted data independently and synthesised evidence narratively. RESULTS: In total, 2512 citations and 66 repositories of guideline developers were screened. Nine articles from databases and eight documents representing seven sources of evidence from guideline developers' repositories were included in the final synthesis. Information about PLRs, their development, and methodology were summarised. Various infographics are used when creating PLRs. The target groups of PLRs are, e.g. patients, policymakers, the public, and healthcare providers. The patients could be involved in creating PLRs. The developers can draw from the GIN Public Toolkit, RIGHT-PVG checklist or DISCERN. Although these methodologies generally cover the development of knowledge translation tools and patients' version of guidelines (PVGs). Numerous tools can be used to translate scientific language and to formulate PLRs. CONCLUSION: We propose policy support for the conduct and implementation of PLRs for healthcare guidelines drawn from available evidence-based resources identified by our review. It is desirable to report approaches for communicating recommendations from healthcare guidelines and verify the actionability and understandability of these formats.
See more in PubMed
Moore A. E., Straus S. E., Kasperavicius D., et al., “Knowledge Translation Tools in Preventive Health Care,” Canadian Family Physician Medecin de famille canadien 63, no. 11 (2017): 853–858. PubMed PMC
Pearson A., Jordan Z., and Munn Z., “Translational Science and Evidence‐Based Healthcare: A Clarification and Reconceptualization of How Knowledge Is Generated and Used in Healthcare,” Nursing Research and Practice 2012 (2012): 792519, 10.1155/2012/792519. PubMed DOI PMC
Pearson A., Stern C., Stem C., Weeks S., and Ovid Technologies I., Translation Science and the JBI Model of Evidence‐based Healthcare (Lippincott Wiliams & Wilkins, 2011).
Alper B. S. and Haynes R. B., “EBHC Pyramid 5.0 for Accessing Preappraised Evidence and Guidance,” Evidence Based Medicine 21, no. 4 (2016): 123–125, 10.1136/ebmed-2016-110447. PubMed DOI
Bryant E. A., Scott A. M., Greenwood H., and Thomas R., “Patient and Public Involvement in the Development of Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Scoping Review,” BMJ Open 12, no. 9 (September 2022): e055428, 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055428. PubMed DOI PMC
GIN Public Working Group . (n.d.).
Stoll M., Kerwer M., Lieb K., and Chasiotis A., “Plain Language Summaries: A Systematic Review of Theory, Guidelines and Empirical Research,” PLoS One 17, no. 6 (June 2022): e0268789, 10.1371/journal.pone.0268789. PubMed DOI PMC
Pitcher N., Mitchell D., and Hughes C., Template and guidance for writing a Cochrane Plain Language Summary. In: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.5 (Updated August 2024). 2024th ed. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-iii-s2-supplementary-material.
PCORI . Foundational Expectations for Partnerships in Research. PCORI (Patient‐Centered Outcomes Research Institute) website: www.pcori.org/FoundationalExpectations. Published February 2, 2024, accessed [10.12.2024].
Andrews J. C., Schünemann H. J., Oxman A. D., et al., “Grade Guidelines: 15. Going From Evidence to Recommendation‐Determinants of a Recommendation's Direction and Strength,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 66 (2013): 726–735. PubMed
Santesso N., Morgano G. P., Jack S. M., et al., “Dissemination of Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Content Analysis of Patient Versions,” Medical Decision Making 36, no. 6 (2016): 692–702, 10.1177/0272989X16644427. PubMed DOI
Dreesens D., Stiggelbout A., Agoritsas T., et al., “A Conceptual Framework for Patient‐Directed Knowledge Tools to Support Patient‐Centred Care: Results From An Evidence‐Informed Consensus Meeting,” Patient Education and Counseling 102 (2019): 1898–1904. PubMed
van der Weijden T., Dreesens D., Faber M. J., et al., “Developing Quality Criteria for Patient‐Directed Knowledge Tools Related to Clinical Practice Guidelines. A Development and Consensus Study,” Health Expectations 22, no. 2 (2019): 201–208, 10.1111/hex.12843. PubMed DOI PMC
Yan L., Hu J., Yu Z., et al., “The Perceptions and Experience of Developing Patient (Version Of) Guidelines: A Descriptive Qualitative Study With Chinese Guideline Developers,” BMC Health Services Research 23, no. 1 (2023): 789, 10.1186/s12913-023-09591-5. PubMed DOI PMC
Wegwarth O., Wagner G. G., and Gigerenzer G., “Can Facts Trump Unconditional Trust? Evidence‐Based Information Halves the Influence of Physicians' Non‐Evidence‐Based Cancer Screening Recommendations,” PLoS One 12 (2017): e0183024. PubMed PMC
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee to Advise the Public Health Service on Clinical Practice Guidelines ., Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program (Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US), 1990, accessed February 22, 2025), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK235751/. PubMed
Loudon K., Santesso N., Callaghan M., et al., “Patient and Public Attitudes to and Awareness of Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Systematic Review With Thematic and Narrative Syntheses,” BMC Health Services Research 14 (2014): 321, 10.1186/1472-6963-14-321. PubMed DOI PMC
Office of Government Procurement , (June 22, 2022),
World Health Organization , (2017), WHO Strategic Communications Framework for Effective Communications. WHO.
NHMRC . (n.d.).
Santesso N., Wiercioch W., Barbara A. M., Dietl H., and Schünemann H. J., “Focus Groups and Interviews With the Public Led to the Development of a Template for a GRADE Plain Language Recommendation (PLR),” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 141 (2022): 18–25, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.09.018. PubMed DOI
WHO‐Covid19 Recommendations, accessed December 10, 2024. https://who.covid19.recmap.org/grid.
Meyer N., Hellbrecht I., Breuing J., et al., “Heterogeneous Methodology in the Development of Patient Versions of Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Scoping Review,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 161 (2023): 53–64, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.07.005. PubMed DOI
Peters M. D., Godfrey C., McInerney P., Munn Z., Tricco A. C., and Khalil H., “Scoping reviews.” in JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis, eds. Aromataris E., Lockwood C., Porritt K., Pilla B., and Jordan Z.. JBI, (2024), 10.46658/JBIMES-24-09. DOI
Tricco A. C., Lillie E., Zarin W., et al., “PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA‐ScR): Checklist and Explanation,” Annals of Internal Medicine 169, no. 7 (2018): 467–473, 10.7326/M18-0850. PubMed DOI
Friessova T., Langaufova A., Dolanová D., et al., Methods and Approaches for Developing Plain Language Versions of Guidelines Recommendations: Scoping Review Protocol, https://osf.io/vqyhf/ (2023, accessed May 10, 2024). PubMed
DeepL Translate ., Deepl SE: https://www.deepl.com/translatorDepartment of Health. (July 8, 2019).
Klugar M., Klugarová J., Kantorová L., et al., Metodika tvorby a aktualizace doporučených postupů a operativních doporučení ve zdravotnictví. Published online July 31, 2024. https://nikez.mzcr.cz/cs/o-nikez/metodiky/.
Slezáková S., Langaufová A., and Klugar M., (2022) Systematic Searching of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Guideline Adaptation – Developing a Checklist of Guideline Sources. In GIN 2022, Toronto. 2022. https://g-i-n.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/GIN-Conference-2022-WEB_19_10-1.pdf.
Clark J., Glasziou P., Del Mar C., Bannach‐Brown A., Stehlik P., and Scott A. M., “A Full Systematic Review Was Completed in 2 Weeks Using Automation Tools: A Case Study,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 121 (2020): 81–90, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.01.008. PubMed DOI
Ouzzani M., Hammady H., Fedorowicz Z., and Elmagarmid A., “Rayyan—A Web and Mobile App for Systematic Reviews,” Systematic Reviews 5, no. 1 (2016): 210, 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4. PubMed DOI PMC
Page M. J., McKenzie J. E., Bossuyt P. M., et al., “The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews,” BMJ 372 (2021): n71, 10.1136/bmj.n71. PubMed DOI PMC
Grant M. J. and Booth A., “A Typology of Reviews: An Analysis of 14 Review Types and Associated Methodologies,” Health Information & Libraries Journal 26, no. 2 (2009): 91–108, 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x. PubMed DOI
Friessová T., Langaufová A., Dolanová D., et al., “Methods and Approaches for Developing Plain Language Versions of Guidelines Recommendations: Scoping Review Protocol,” Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 30, no. 8 (December 2024): 1543–1545, Epub 2024 Jul 3. 10.1111/jep.14075. PubMed DOI
Sinclair S. and Rockwell G., (2016), Voyant ools, http://voyant-tools.org/.
de Wit M. P. T., Smolen J. S., Gossec L., and van der Heijde D. M. F. M., “Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis to Target: The Patient Version of the International Recommendations,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 70, no. 6 (2011): 891–895, 10.1136/ard.2010.146662. PubMed DOI PMC
Krist A. H., Peele E., Woolf S. H., et al., “Designing a Patient‐Centered Personal Health Record to Promote Preventive Care,” BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 11, no. 1 (2011): 73, 10.1186/1472-6947-11-73. PubMed DOI PMC
Babatunde O. O., Tan V., Jordan J. L., et al., “Evidence Flowers: An Innovative, Visual Method of Presenting ʻBest Evidenceʼ Summaries to Health Professional and Lay Audiences,” Research Synthesis Methods 9, no. 2 (2018): 273–284, 10.1002/jrsm.1295. PubMed DOI
Pottie K., Smith M., Matthews M., et al., “A Multistakeholder Development Process to Prioritize and Translate COVID‐19 Health Recommendations for Patients, Caregivers and the Public. A Case Study of the COVID‐19 Recommendation Map,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 148 (2022): 104–114, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.04.012. PubMed DOI PMC
Rabassa M., Alonso‐Coello P., and Casino G., “Nutrimedia: A Novel Web‐Based Resource for the General Public That Evaluates the Veracity of Nutrition Claims Using the GRADE Approach,” PLoS One 15, no. 4 (2020): e0232393, 10.1371/journal.pone.0232393. PubMed DOI PMC
Bruce I. A., Ezgü F. S., Kampmann C., et al., “Addressing the Need for Patient‐Friendly Medical Communications: Adaptation of the 2019 Recommendations for the Management of MPS VI and MPS IVA,” Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 17, no. 1 (2022): 91, 10.1186/s13023-022-02219-7. PubMed DOI PMC
Cronin R. M., Mayo‐Gamble T. L., Stimpson S.‐J., et al., “Adapting Medical Guidelines to Be Patient‐Centered Using a Patient‐Driven Process for Individuals With Sickle Cell Disease and Their Caregivers,” BMC Hematology 18 (2018): 12, 10.1186/s12878-018-0106-3. PubMed DOI PMC
Kiltz U., van der Heijde D., Mielants H., Feldtkeller E., and Braun J., “ASAS/EULAR Recommendations for the Management of Ankylosing Spondylitis: The Patient Version,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 68, no. 9 (2009): 1381–1386, 10.1136/ard.2008.096073. PubMed DOI
Duodecim , (January 2023),
SNLG . (March 2023),
Haute Autorité de Santé , (2008),
SIGN , (2021),
SIGN , (March 2019),
Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care , (March 2023),
Nothacker M., Gaebel W., Gogol M., et al., (February 2024),
Schwarz S., Siegert S., and Schaefer C., (2024), DOI
Schell L. K., Meerpohl J. J., Gartlehner G., Langer G., Perleth M., and Schünemann H. J., “GRADE Leitlinien: 13. Erstellen Von Summary‐Of‐Findings‐Tabellen Und Evidenzprofilen – Kontinuierliche Endpunkte,” Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen 108, no. 5–6 (2014): 333–347, 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.05.002. PubMed DOI
Charnock D., “Learning to DISCERN Online: Applying An Appraisal Tool to Health Websites in a Workshop Setting,” Health Education Research 19, no. 4 (2004): 440–446, 10.1093/her/cyg046. PubMed DOI
Schünemann H. J., Wiercioch W., Etxeandia I., et al., “Guidelines 2.0: Systematic Development of a Comprehensive Checklist for a Successful Guideline Enterprise,” Canadian Medical Association Journal 186, no. 3 (2014): E123–E142, 10.1503/cmaj.131237. PubMed DOI PMC
Klugar M., Lotfi T., Darzi A. J., et al., “GRADE Guidance 39: Using GRADE‐ADOLOPMENT to Adopt, Adapt or Create Contextualized Recommendations From Source Guidelines and Evidence Syntheses,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 174 (2024): 111494, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111494. PubMed DOI
Elliott S. A., Scott S. D., Charide R., et al., “A Multimethods Randomized Trial Found That Plain Language Versions Improved Parents' Understanding of Health Recommendations,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 161 (2023): 8–19, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.06.018. PubMed DOI
Sayfi S., Charide R., Elliott S. A., et al., “A Multimethods Randomized Trial Found That Plain Language Versions Improved Adults Understanding of Health Recommendations,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 165 (2024): 111219, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.11.009. PubMed DOI
Stallwood L., Sammy A., Prebeg M., et al., “Plain Language vs Standard Format for Youth Understanding of COVID‐19 Recommendations: A Randomized Clinical Trial,” JAMA Pediatrics 177, no. 9 (2023): 956–965, 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.2686. PubMed DOI PMC
Klugar M., Kantorová L., Pokorná A., et al., “Visual Transformation for Guidelines Presentation of the Strength of Recommendations and the Certainty of Evidence,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 143 (2022): 178–185. PubMed
Fearns N., Walker L., Graham K., Gibb N., and Service D., “User Testing of a Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network Public Guideline for the Parents of Children With Autism,” BMC Health Services Research 22 (2022): 77. PubMed PMC
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) , Autism. A Booklet for Adults, Partners, Friends, Family Members and Carers. Edinburgh: SIGN; 2016. ISBN 978 1 909103 45 0. [cited 05.04.2025]. http://www.sign.ac.uk.
Akl E. A., Maroun N., Guyatt G., et al., “Symbols Were Superior to Numbers for Presenting Strength of Recommendations to Health Care Consumers: A Randomized Trial,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 60 (2007): 1298–1305. PubMed
Becker M., Bühn S., Meyer N., et al., “Investigating the Role and Applicability of Patient Versions of Guidelines in Oncology and Deriving Recommendations for the Development, Dissemination and Implementation of Patient Versions in Germany: Protocol for Multiphase Study,” BMJ Open 12, no. 3 (2022): e059040, 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059040. PubMed DOI PMC
Yan L.‐J., Li S.‐A., Jin X., et al., “Development of Patient Versions of Guidelines in Chinese Mainland: A Systematic Survey of Current Practices and Methods,” Patient Education and Counseling 105, no. 12 (2022): 3410–3421, 10.1016/j.pec.2022.09.009. PubMed DOI
Fearns N., Graham K., Johnston G., and Service D., “Improving the User Experience of Patient Versions of Clinical Guidelines: User Testing of a Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network (SIGN) Patient Version,” BMC Health Services Research 16, no. 1 (2016): 37, 10.1186/s12913-016-1287-8. PubMed DOI PMC
Wang X., Chen Y., Akl E. A., et al., “The Reporting Checklist for Public Versions of Guidelines: RIGHT‐PVG,” Implementation Science 16, no. 1 (2021): 10, 10.1186/s13012-020-01066-z. PubMed DOI PMC
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) , A Guideline Developer's Handbook. Edinburgh: SIGN; 2025, (SIGN publication no. 50). [March 2025]. http://www.sign.ac.uk.
Work group of the Methodological Manual, “Implementation of Clinical Practice Guidelines Recommendations in Shared Decision‐Making” , Madrid: Ministry of Health; Zaragoza: Aragon Health Sciences Institute (IACS); 2022, Clinical Practice Guidelines in the SNHS. ISBN 978‐84‐09‐62234‐4.
Leitlinenprogramm Onkologie , (2024):
Commissioner O. of the, (May 2023),
ESMO , (2024),
National Comprehensive Cancer Network , (2024),
VA.gov Design System , (2023),