Impulsivity, psychopathy, and the dark triad: a Czech validation of the dirty dozen scale

. 2025 Oct 23 ; 13 (1) : 1170. [epub] 20251023

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, validační studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid41131567

Grantová podpora
IGA_CMTF_2023_001 Sts Cyril and Methodius Faculty of Theology of Palacky University Olomouc
IGA_CMTF_2023_001 Sts Cyril and Methodius Faculty of Theology of Palacky University Olomouc
IGA_CMTF_2023_001 Sts Cyril and Methodius Faculty of Theology of Palacky University Olomouc
IGA_CMTF_2023_001 Sts Cyril and Methodius Faculty of Theology of Palacky University Olomouc
No. CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004587 ERDF/ESF project TECHSCALE
2110 Faculty of Education, the University of Hradec Králové

Odkazy

PubMed 41131567
PubMed Central PMC12548213
DOI 10.1186/s40359-025-03371-y
PII: 10.1186/s40359-025-03371-y
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

BACKGROUND: The dark triad concept suggests dark personality traits share a common core. Having reliable measurement tools is essential to test this claim. Concerns exist about the widely used Dark Triad Dirty Dozen (DTDD) tool, specifically regarding its ability to fully assess psychopathy. This study aims to adapt the DTDD for a Czech population and to enhance the psychopathy subscale by adding items. Examining the scale's functioning in different linguistic and cultural contexts is crucial for ensuring its validity beyond the populations in which it was originally developed, and the Czech sample provides an opportunity to assess the stability of the DTDD in a less frequently studied setting. METHODS: This study (n = 6715, Mean Age = 36.14, SD = 14.72, Females: 65.5%) collected data from four online surveys in a Czech population. In addition to socio-demographic characteristics, we measured empathy, the Dark Triad (Machiavellianism, narcissism, psychopathy), self-esteem, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness and Neuroticism. RESULTS: Results supported the original 12-item DTDD's three-factor structure (CFI = 0.942; TLI = 0.925; RMSEA = 0.062; SRMR = 0.055), showing good internal consistency for the general Dark Triad factor (Cronbach's α = 0.85 and McDonald's ω = 0.89). A 14-item DTDD version with additional items demonstrated slightly lower fit (CFI = 0.93; TLI = 0.912; RMSEA = 0.063; SRMR = 0.062) and comparable internal consistency to the 12-item version. The 12-item version was invariant between genders, with males scoring higher. Narcissism correlated negatively with Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and self-esteem, and positively with Neuroticism. Machiavellianism and psychopathy were negatively associated with empathy, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness, and positively with Neuroticism. CONCLUSIONS: This research confirms the 12-item DTDD scale's validity in the Czech population.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Dinić BM, Petrović B, Jonason PK. Serbian adaptations of the dark triad dirty dozen (DTDD) and short dark triad (SD3). Pers Indiv Differ. 2018;134:321–8. 10.1016/j.paid.2018.06.018.

Dragostinov Y, Mõttus R. Test-Retest reliability and construct validity of the brief dark triad measurements. J Pers Assess. 2023;105:143–8. 10.1080/00223891.2022.2052303. PubMed

Malesza M, Kaczmarek MC. Dark side of health-predicting health behaviors and diseases with the dark triad traits. J Public Health (Berl). 2021;29:275–84. 10.1007/s10389-019-01129-6.

Furnham A, Richards SC, Paulhus DL. The dark triad of personality: A 10 year review. Soc Pers Psychol Compass. 2013;7:199–216. 10.1111/spc3.12018.

Jones DN, Figueredo AJ. The core of darkness: Uncovering the heart of the dark triad. Eur J Pers. 2013;27:521–31. 10.1002/per.1893.

Kowalski CM, Vernon PA, Schermer JA. The general factor of personality: the relationship between the big one and the dark triad. Pers Indiv Differ. 2016;88:256–60. 10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.028.

Sharpe BM, Collison KL, Lynam DR, Miller JD. Does machiavellianism meaningfully differ from psychopathy? It depends. Behav Sci Law. 2021;39:663–77. 10.1002/bsl.2538. PubMed

Miller JD, Hyatt CS, Maples-Keller JL, Carter NT, Lynam DR. Psychopathy and machiavellianism: A distinction without a difference? J Pers. 2017;85:439–53. 10.1111/jopy.12251. PubMed

Moshagen M, Hilbig BE, Zettler I. The dark core of personality. Psychol Rev. 2018;125:656–88. 10.1037/rev0000111. PubMed

Vize CE, Miller JD, Lynam DR. Antagonism in the dark triad. The handbook of antagonism: conceptualizations, assessment, consequences, and treatment of the low end of agreeableness. San Diego, CA, US: Elsevier Academic; 2019. pp. 253–67. 10.1016/B978-0-12-814627-9.00017-7.

Jones DN, Paulhus DL. Machiavellianism. In: Leary MR, Hoyle RH, editor. Handbook of individual differences in social behavior. New York, NY, US: The Guilford Press; 2009. pp. 93–108.

Muris P, Merckelbach H, Otgaar H, Meijer E. The malevolent side of human nature: A Meta-Analysis and critical review of the literature on the dark triad (Narcissism, machiavellianism, and Psychopathy). Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017;12:183–204. 10.1177/1745691616666070. PubMed

Harpur TJ, Hare RD, Hakstian AR. Two-factor conceptualization of psychopathy: construct validity and assessment implications. Psychol Assessment: J Consulting Clin Psychol. 1989;1:6–17. 10.1037/1040-3590.1.1.6.

Marcus DK, Fulton JJ, Edens JF. The two-factor model of psychopathic personality: evidence from the psychopathic personality inventory. Personal Disord. 2013;4:67–76. 10.1037/a0025282. PubMed

Hare RD, Neumann CS. Psychopathy as a Clinical and Empirical Construct. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 2008;4 Volume 4, 2008:217–46. 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091452 PubMed

Hare RD. Psychopathy: theory and research. Wiley; 1970.

Poythress NG, Hall JR. Psychopathy and impulsivity reconsidered. Aggress Violent Beh. 2011;16:120–34. 10.1016/j.avb.2011.02.003.

Cooke DJ, Michie C. Refining the construct of psychopathy: towards a hierarchical model. Psychol Assess. 2001;13:171–88. PubMed

Smith S, Edens JF, McDermott BarbaraE. Fearless dominance and Self-Centered impulsivity interact to predict predatory aggression among forensic psychiatric inpatients. Int J Forensic Mental Health. 2013;12:33–41. 10.1080/14999013.2012.760186.

Paulhus DL, Williams KM. The dark triad of personality: narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. J Res Pers. 2002;36:556–63. 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6.

Jonason PK, Kaufman SB, Webster GD, Geher G. What Lies beneath the dark triad dirty dozen: varied relations with the big five. Individual Differences Res. 2013;11:81–90.

Kowalski CM, Vernon PA, Schermer JA. The dark triad and facets of personality. Curr Psychol. 2021;40:5547–58. 10.1007/s12144-019-00518-0.

Stead R, Fekken GC. Agreeableness at the core of the dark triad of personality. Individual Differences Res. 2014;12:131–41.

Jakobwitz S, Egan V. The dark triad and normal personality traits. Pers Indiv Differ. 2006;40:331–9. 10.1016/j.paid.2005.07.006.

Furnham A, Treglown L. The dark side of High-Fliers: the dark triad, High-Flier traits, engagement, and subjective success. Front Psychol. 2021;12. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.647676. PubMed PMC

Jones DN, Paulhus DL. Introducing the short dark triad (SD3): A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment. 2014;21:28–41. 10.1177/1073191113514105. PubMed

Jonason PK, Webster GD. The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad. Psychol Assess. 2010;22:420–32. 10.1037/a0019265. PubMed

Maples JL, Lamkin J, Miller JD. A test of two brief measures of the dark triad: the dirty dozen and short dark triad. Psychol Assess. 2014;26:326–31. 10.1037/a0035084. PubMed

Miller JD, Few LR, Seibert LA, Watts A, Zeichner A, Lynam DR. An examination of the dirty dozen measure of psychopathy: A cautionary Tale about the costs of brief measures. Psychol Assess. 2012;24:1048–53. 10.1037/a0028583. PubMed

Hosker-Field AM, Molnar DS, Book AS. Psychopathy and risk taking: examining the role of risk perception. Pers Indiv Differ. 2016;91:123–32. 10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.059.

Luk JW, Worley MJ, Winiger E, Trim RS, Hopfer CJ, Hewitt JK, et al. Risky driving and sexual behaviors as developmental outcomes of co-occurring substance use and antisocial behavior. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;169:19–25. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.10.006. PubMed PMC

Verdejo-García A, Lawrence AJ, Clark L. Impulsivity as a vulnerability marker for substance-use disorders: review of findings from high-risk research, problem gamblers and genetic association studies. Neurosci Biobehavioral Reviews. 2008;32:777–810. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.11.003. PubMed

Loree AM, Lundahl LH, Ledgerwood DM. Impulsivity as a predictor of treatment outcome in substance use disorders: review and synthesis. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2015;34:119–34. 10.1111/dar.12132. PubMed

James S, Montgomery SB, Leslie LK, Zhang J. Sexual risk behaviors among youth in the child welfare system. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2009;31:990–1000. 10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.04.014. PubMed PMC

Zhao Y, Luo T, Tucker JD, Wong WCW. Risk factors of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections in china: A systematic review of reviews. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0140426. 10.1371/journal.pone.0140426. PubMed PMC

Crysel LC, Crosier BS, Webster GD. The dark triad and risk behavior. Pers Indiv Differ. 2013;54:35–40. 10.1016/j.paid.2012.07.029.

Jauk E, Dieterich R. Addiction and the dark triad of personality. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10. 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00662. PubMed PMC

Burtăverde V, Jonason PK, Ene C, Istrate M. On being dark and promiscuous: the dark triad traits, mate value, disgust, and sociosexuality. Pers Indiv Differ. 2021;168:110255. 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110255.

Lykken DT. The antisocial personalities. Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 1995.

Patrick CJ, Fowles DC, Krueger RF. Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness. Dev Psychopathol. 2009;21:913–38. 10.1017/S0954579409000492. PubMed

Glenn AL, Sellbom M. Theoretical and empirical concerns regarding the dark triad as a construct. J Pers Disord. 2015;29:360–77. 10.1521/pedi_2014_28_162. PubMed

Pechorro P, Caramelo V, Oliveira JP, Nunes C, Curtis SR, Jones DN. The short dark triad (SD3): adaptation and psychometrics among at-risk male and female youths. Deviant Behav. 2019;40:273–86. 10.1080/01639625.2017.1421120.

Pailing A, Boon J, Egan V. Personality, the dark triad and violence. Pers Indiv Differ. 2014;67:81–6. 10.1016/j.paid.2013.11.018.

Živná K, Novak L, Malinakova K, Tavel P. Dark personality traits and their structure. 2023. 10.17605/OSF.IO/VK7TC

Czarna AZ, Jonason PK, Dufner M, Kossowska M. The dirty dozen scale: validation of a Polish version and extension of the Nomological net. Front Psychol. 2016;7. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00445. PubMed PMC

Mejzlíková T, Preiss M, Maliňáková J, Raisová M, Bolceková E. Česká validizační studie škály krátká temná trojice. Aplikovaná psychologie. 2018.

The Big Five Trait taxonomy. History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. https://awspntest.apa.org/record/1999-04371-004. Accessed 22 Nov 2024.

Hřebíčková M, Urbánek T. NEO pětifaktorový osobnostní inventář. 2001.

Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent Self-Image. Princeton University Press; 1965.

Blatný M, Osecká L, Blatný M, Osecká L. Rosenbergova Škála sebehodnocení: struktura Globálního Vztahu k Sobě. Československá Psychologie. 1994;38:481–8.

Spreng* RN, McKinnon* MC, Mar RA, Levine B. The Toronto empathy questionnaire: scale development and initial validation of a Factor-Analytic solution to multiple empathy measures. J Pers Assess. 2009;91:62–71. 10.1080/00223890802484381. PubMed PMC

Novak L, Malinakova K, Mikoska P, van Dijk JP, Dechterenko F, Ptacek R, et al. Psychometric analysis of the Czech version of the Toronto empathy questionnaire. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:5343. 10.3390/ijerph18105343. PubMed PMC

Carter GL, Campbell AC, Muncer S, Carter KA. A Mokken analysis of the dark triad ‘dirty dozen’: sex and age differences in scale structures, and issues with individual items. Pers Indiv Differ. 2015;83:185–91. 10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.012.

Rogoza R, Cieciuch J. Dark triad traits and their structure: an empirical approach. Curr Psychol. 2020;39:1287–302. 10.1007/s12144-018-9834-6.

Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Res Methods. 2000;3:4–70. 10.1177/109442810031002.

Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen M. Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. Articles. 2008. 10.21427/D7CF7R

Jackson DL, Gillaspy JA Jr, Purc-Stephenson R. Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations. Psychol Methods. 2009;14:6–23. 10.1037/a0014694. PubMed

Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive Goodness-of-Fit measures. Methods Psychol Res. 2003;8:23–74.

Rhemtulla M, Brosseau-Liard PÉ, Savalei V. When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM Estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychol Methods. 2012;17:354–73. 10.1037/a0029315. PubMed

Li C-H. Statistical Estimation of structural equation models with a mixture of continuous and categorical observed variables. Behav Res. 2021;53:2191–213. 10.3758/s13428-021-01547-z. PubMed

Feißt M, Hennigs A, Heil J, Moosbrugger H, Kelava A, Stolpner I, et al. Refining scores based on patient reported outcomes – statistical and medical perspectives. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019;19:167. 10.1186/s12874-019-0806-9. PubMed PMC

Williams EJ. The comparison of regression variables. J Royal Stat Soc Ser B (Methodological). 1959;21:396–9.

Novak L, Psychtoolbox. Tools for psychology research and psychometrics. Olomouc, Czech Republic: Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacky University in Olomouc; 2022.

Rosseel Y. Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw. 2012;48:1–36. 10.18637/jss.v048.i02.

Aust F, Barth M. papaja: Create APA manuscripts with R Markdown. 2020.

Revelle W, Psych. Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University; 2020.

Book A, Visser BA, Volk AA. Unpacking evil: claiming the core of the dark triad. Pers Indiv Differ. 2015;73:29–38. 10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.016.

Jonason PK, Luévano VX. Walking the thin line between efficiency and accuracy: validity and structural properties of the dirty dozen. Pers Indiv Differ. 2013;55:76–81. 10.1016/j.paid.2013.02.010.

McLarnon MJW, Tarraf RC. The dark triad: specific or general sources of variance? A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling approach. Pers Indiv Differ. 2017;112:67–73. 10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.049.

Sellbom M, Tellegen A. Factor analysis in psychological assessment research: common pitfalls and recommendations. Psychol Assess. 2019;31:1428–41. 10.1037/pas0000623. PubMed

Bonifay W, Cai L. On the complexity of item response theory models. Multivar Behav Res. 2017;52:465–84. 10.1080/00273171.2017.1309262. PubMed

Jones DN, Paulhus DL. The role of impulsivity in the dark triad of personality. Pers Indiv Differ. 2011;51:679–82. 10.1016/j.paid.2011.04.011.

Malesza M, Ostaszewski P. Dark side of impulsivity — Associations between the dark triad, self-report and behavioral measures of impulsivity. Pers Indiv Differ. 2016;88:197–201. 10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.016.

West SJ, Psederska E, Bozgunov K, Nedelchev D, Vasilev G, Thomson ND, et al. Identifying distinct profiles of impulsivity for the four facets of psychopathy. PLoS ONE. 2023;18:e0283866. 10.1371/journal.pone.0283866. PubMed PMC

Faucher J, Savard C, Gamache D. Measurement invariance of the dark triad dirty dozen across nonclinical and clinical populations, genders, and age groups. Pers Indiv Differ. 2023;206:112103. 10.1016/j.paid.2023.112103.

De Buck A, Pauwels LJR, Hardyns W, Ponnet K. Testing measurement invariance of the dark triad dirty dozen in a Belgian adult sample. Psychol Belg. 2021;61:377–90. 10.5334/pb.1106. PubMed PMC

Wood W, Eagly AH. Chapter two - Biosocial construction of sex differences and similarities in behavior. In: Olson JM, Zanna MP, editors. Advances in experimental social psychology. Academic; 2012. pp. 55–123. 10.1016/B978-0-12-394281-4.00002-7.

Chiorri C, Garofalo C, Velotti P. Does the dark triad manifest similarly in men and women?? Measurement invariance of the dirty dozen across sex. Curr Psychol. 2019;38:659–75. 10.1007/s12144-017-9641-5.

Jonason PK, Davis MD. A gender role view of the dark triad traits. Pers Indiv Differ. 2018;125:102–5. 10.1016/j.paid.2018.01.004.

Luo YLL, Kovas Y, Wang L, Stalikas A, Kyriazos TA, Gianniou F-M, et al. Sex differences in the dark triad are sensitive to socioeconomic conditions: the adaptive value of narcissism in the UK, greece, and China. Curr Psychol. 2023;42:22436–48. 10.1007/s12144-022-03302-9.

McDonald MM, Donnellan MB, Navarrete CD. A life history approach to Understanding the dark triad. Pers Indiv Differ. 2012;52:601–5. 10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.003.

Jonason PK, Li NP, Webster GD, Schmitt DP. The dark triad: facilitating a short-term mating strategy in men. Eur J Pers. 2009;23:5–18. 10.1002/per.698.

Savard C, Simard C, Jonason PK. Psychometric properties of the French-Canadian version of the dark triad dirty dozen. Pers Indiv Differ. 2017;119:122–8. 10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.044.

Vernon PA, Villani VC, Vickers LC, Harris JA. A behavioral genetic investigation of the dark triad and the big 5. Pers Indiv Differ. 2008;44:445–52. 10.1016/j.paid.2007.09.007.

Moshagen M, Zettler I, Horsten LK, Hilbig BE. Agreeableness and the common core of dark traits are functionally different constructs. J Res Pers. 2020;87:103986. 10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103986.

Pilch I. As cold as a fish? Relationships between the dark triad personality traits and affective experience during the day: A day reconstruction study. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0229625. 10.1371/journal.pone.0229625. PubMed PMC

Özsoy E, Rauthmann JF, Jonason PK, Ardıç K. Reliability and validity of the Turkish versions of dark triad dirty dozen (DTDD-T), short dark triad (SD3-T), and single item narcissism scale (SINS-T). Pers Indiv Differ. 2017;117:11–4. 10.1016/j.paid.2017.05.019.

Pechorro P, Jonason PK, Raposo V, Maroco J. Dirty dozen: A concise measure of dark triad traits among at-risk youths. Curr Psychol. 2021;40:3522–31. 10.1007/s12144-019-00288-9.

Zhang H, Luo Y, Zhao Y, Zhang R, Wang Z. Differential relations of grandiose narcissism and vulnerable narcissism to emotion dysregulation: Self-esteem matters. Asian J Soc Psychol. 2017;20:232–7. 10.1111/ajsp.12191.

Heym N, Firth J, Kibowski F, Sumich A, Egan V, Bloxsom CAJ. Empathy at the heart of darkness: empathy deficits that bind the dark triad and those that mediate indirect relational aggression. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10. 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00095. PubMed PMC

Jonason PK, Lyons M, Bethell EJ, Ross R. Different routes to limited empathy in the sexes: examining the links between the dark triad and empathy. Pers Indiv Differ. 2013;54:572–6. 10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.009.

van Dongen JDM. The empathic brain of psychopaths: from social science to neuroscience in empathy. Front Psychol. 2020;11:695. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00695. PubMed PMC

Blair RJR. The neurobiology of psychopathic traits in youths. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013;14:786–99. 10.1038/nrn3577. PubMed PMC

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...