Discrepancies between routine sacroiliac joint MRI reporting and current expert recommendations in patients with spondyloarthritis

. 2025 Dec 17 ; 11 (4) : . [epub] 20251217

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid41407432

BACKGROUND: Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) MRI is commonly used in diagnosing spondyloarthritis (SpA). Current Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) recommendations on reporting SIJ MRIs in patients with known or suspected axial SpA recommend always stating whether bone marrow oedema (BME), erosions and fat lesions are present/absent and whether the MRI is compatible with axial SpA. PURPOSE: To investigate if routine care radiologists already report what has now been recommended and to assess the agreement between local radiologists and central SpA experts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study includes retrospective interpretation of images acquired in routine care. Patients diagnosed with SpA enrolled in a clinical registry in one of five European countries involved in the EuroSpA Collaboration, with an available SIJ MRI and an associated local MRI report, were included. MRIs were read centrally by two readers, who registered global features (eg, MRI indicative of SpA), and various inflammatory and structural lesions as present/absent. Similar information was extracted from local reports. Findings were analysed with descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Overall, 913 patients (40 years±13, 492 men) were included. In 24%, the local MRI reports stated whether the MRI was overall indicative of SpA or not. Presence/absence of BME, erosions and fat lesions was mentioned in 88%, 48% and 29% of local reports, respectively. Inflammatory lesions were more often reported as present by local than central readers (46% vs 36%), and structural lesions less often (33% vs 50%). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a large gap between the clinical practice of reporting SIJ MRIs and recent reporting recommendations.

Centre for Rheumatology Landspitali University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine University of Iceland Reykjavík Iceland

Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research COPECARE Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases Rigshospitalet Glostrup Denmark

Department of Diagnostic Imaging Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer Israel

Department of Internal Medicine Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Capital Region of Denmark Denmark

Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging University of Alberta Edmonton Queensland Canada

Department of Radiology Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev Gentofte Herlev Denmark

Department of Radiology Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf Brandenburg Medical School Rüdersdorf bei Berlin Germany

Department of Radiology National Institute of Geriatrics Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Warsaw Poland

Department of Rheumatology and Immunology Inselspital Universitatsspital Bern Bern Switzerland

Department of Rheumatology University Hospital Ghent Ghent Flanders Belgium

Department of Rheumatology University Hospital Zurich University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland

Department of Rheumatology University Medical Centre Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia

Faculty of Medicine University of Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia

Institute of Radiology University Medical Centre Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia

Institute of Rheumatology and Department of Rheumatology 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Rheumatology Department Hopitaux Universitaires Geneve Geneve Switzerland

Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center Tel Aviv Israel

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Diekhoff T, Eshed I, Giraudo C, et al. Reporting Sacroiliac Joint Imaging Performed for Known or Suspected Axial Spondyloarthritis: Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society Recommendations. Radiology. 2024;311:e231786. doi: 10.1148/radiol.231786. PubMed DOI

Maksymowych WP, Pedersen SJ, Weber U, et al. Central reader evaluation of MRI scans of the sacroiliac joints from the ASAS classification cohort: discrepancies with local readers and impact on the performance of the ASAS criteria. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79:935–42. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217232. PubMed DOI

van den Berg R, Lenczner G, Thévenin F, et al. Classification of axial SpA based on positive imaging (radiographs and/or MRI of the sacroiliac joints) by local rheumatologists or radiologists versus central trained readers in the DESIR cohort. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74:2016–21. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205432. PubMed DOI

Linde L, Ørnbjerg LM, Rasmussen SH, et al. Commonalities and differences in set-up and data collection across European spondyloarthritis registries - results from the EuroSpA collaboration. Arthritis Res Ther. 2023;25:205. doi: 10.1186/s13075-023-03184-7. PubMed DOI PMC

Ørnbjerg LM, Brahe CH, Askling J, et al. Treatment response and drug retention rates in 24 195 biologic-naïve patients with axial spondyloarthritis initiating TNFi treatment: routine care data from 12 registries in the EuroSpA collaboration. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78:1536–44. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215427. PubMed DOI

Zink A, Askling J, Dixon WG, et al. European biologicals registers: methodology, selected results and perspectives. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:1240–6. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.091926. PubMed DOI

Hetland ML. DANBIO--powerful research database and electronic patient record. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2011;50:69–77. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq309. PubMed DOI

Watson K, Symmons D, Griffiths I, et al. The British Society for Rheumatology biologics register. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64 Suppl 4:iv42–3. doi: 10.1136/ard.2005.042499. PubMed DOI PMC

Maksymowych W, Hadsbjerg AEFEF, Østergaard M, et al. Validation of SPARCC MRI-RETIC e-tools for increasing scoring proficiency of MRI sacroiliac joint lesions in axial spondyloarthritis. RMD Open. 2024;10:e003923. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003923. PubMed DOI PMC

Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewé R, et al. The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:777–83. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.108233. PubMed DOI

Maksymowych WP, Lambert RG, Østergaard M, et al. MRI lesions in the sacroiliac joints of patients with spondyloarthritis: an update of definitions and validation by the ASAS MRI working group. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78:1550–8. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215589. PubMed DOI

Lambert RGW, Bakker PAC, van der Heijde D, et al. Defining active sacroiliitis on MRI for classification of axial spondyloarthritis: update by the ASAS MRI working group. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75:1958–63. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208642. PubMed DOI

Diekhoff T, Giraudo C, Machado PM, et al. Clinical information on imaging referrals for suspected or known axial spondyloarthritis: recommendations from the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) Ann Rheum Dis. 2024;83:1636–43.:e226280. doi: 10.1136/ard-2024-226280. PubMed DOI PMC

Reporting and data systems (RADS) 2025. https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Clinical-Tools-and-Reference/Reporting-and-Data-Systems Available.

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...