Clinicopathological Significance of Pluripotent Factors in Sinonasal Intestinal-Type Adenocarcinoma
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
41463190
PubMed Central
PMC12731205
DOI
10.3390/cancers17243939
PII: cancers17243939
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- ITAC, KLF4, NANOG, OCT4, SOX2, c-MYC, prognosis, sinonasal cancer,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Background/Objectives: Sinonasal intestinal-type adenocarcinoma (ITAC) is a rare and aggressive tumor with a lack of specific symptoms, which leads to late diagnosis, and is characterized by frequent local recurrence and low survival rate. The stemness phenotype is one of the main causes leading to tumor proliferation, recurrence, and resistance to standard chemo/radiotherapy. Methods: In this study, genes encoding pluripotency-associated transcription factors, including KLF4, c-MYC, SOX2, OCT4 (Yamanaka factors), and NANOG were evaluated in malignant and non-malignant tissues of a cohort of 54 patients with ITAC, and their expression was related to patient outcome. The c-MYC, SOX2, and OCT4 levels were then confirmed in immunohistochemistry by adding ALDH1A1 as a factor involved in stemness. Results: KLF4, SOX2, and NANOG best distinguished cancer tissue from normal tissue with high sensibility and specificity. Low levels of KLF4, c-MYC, and NANOG and high expressions of SOX2 and OCT4 in tumor tissue correlated with poor overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), respectively. Through multivariate analysis, type of surgery was found to be a significant prognostic factor along with c-MYC and OCT4. Notably, tumor positivity for c-MYC and ALDH1A1 was associated with longer disease-specific survival, thus suggesting their role as tumor suppressors. Conclusions: Our findings underline the stemness phenotype as a prognostic model for ITAC, supporting the clinical plausibility of Yamanaka factors in sinonasal cancer prediction.
Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences University of Bologna 40126 Bologna Italy
Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences Polytechnic University of Marche 60126 Ancona Italy
Department of Sensory Organs La Sapienza University 00185 Rome Italy
ENT Division Bellaria Hospital AUSL Bologna 40124 Bologna Italy
Institute of Biotechnology Czech Academy of Sciences 25250 Prague Czech Republic
School of Pharmacy and Medical Science Griffith University Southport QLD 4222 Australia
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Kim J., Chang H., Jeong E.C. Sinonasal intestinal-type adenocarcinoma in the frontal sinus. Arch. Craniofac. Surg. 2018;19:210–213. doi: 10.7181/acfs.2018.01970. PubMed DOI PMC
Llorente J.L., López F., Suárez C., Hermsen M.A. Sinonasal carcinoma: Clinical, pathological, genetic and therapeutic advances. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2014;11:460–472. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.97. PubMed DOI
Riobello C., Sánchez-Fernández P., Cabal V.N., García-Marín R., Suárez-Fernández L., Vivanco B., Blanco-Lorenzo V., Álvarez Marcos C., López F., Llorente J.L., et al. Aberrant Signaling Pathways in Sinonasal Intestinal-Type Adenocarcinoma. Cancers. 2021;13:5022. doi: 10.3390/cancers13195022. PubMed DOI PMC
Leivo I., Holmila R., Luce D., Steiniche T., Dictor M., Heikkilä P., Husgafvel-Pursiainen K., Wolff H. Occurrence of Sinonasal Intestinal-Type Adenocarcinoma and Non-Intestinal-Type Adenocarcinoma in Two Countries with Different Patterns of Wood Dust Exposure. Cancers. 2021;13:5245. doi: 10.3390/cancers13205245. PubMed DOI PMC
Maffeis V., Cappellesso R., Zanon A., Cazzador D., Emanuelli E., Martini A., Fassina A. HER2 status in sinonasal intestinal-type adenocarcinoma. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2019;215:152432. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2019.04.024. PubMed DOI
Thompson L.D.R., Franchi A. New tumor entities in the 4th edition of the World Health Organization classification of head and neck tumors: Nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses and skull base. Virchows Arch. 2018;472:315–330. doi: 10.1007/s00428-017-2116-0. PubMed DOI
Meccariello G., Deganello A., Choussy O., Gallo O., Vitali D., De Raucourt D., Georgalas C. Endoscopic nasal versus open approach for the management of sinonasal adenocarcinoma: A pooled-analysis of 1826 patients. Head Neck. 2016;38((Suppl. 1)):E2267–E2274. doi: 10.1002/hed.24182. PubMed DOI
Rampinelli V., Ferrari M., Nicolai P. Intestinal-type adenocarcinoma of the sinonasal tract: An update. Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2018;26:115–121. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000445. PubMed DOI
Abu-Shama Y., Renard S., Nguyen D.T., Henrot P., Toussaint B., Rumeau C., Gallet P., Jankowski R. Descriptive analysis of recurrences of nasal intestinal-type adenocarcinomas after radiotherapy. Head Neck. 2022;44:1356–1367. doi: 10.1002/hed.27032. PubMed DOI
Camp S., Van Gerven L., Poorten V.V., Nuyts S., Hermans R., Hauben E., Jorissen M. Long-term follow-up of 123 patients with adenocarcinoma of the sinonasal tract treated with endoscopic resection and postoperative radiation therapy. Head Neck. 2016;38:294–300. doi: 10.1002/hed.23900. PubMed DOI
Baptista Freitas M., Costa M., Freire Coelho A., Rodrigues Pereira P., Leal M., Sarmento C., Águas L., Barbosa M. Sinonasal Adenocarcinoma: Clinicopathological Characterization and Prognostic Factors. Cureus. 2024;16:e56067. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56067. PubMed DOI PMC
Li J., Li B., Xu J., Wang H., Gao Q., Ye F., Xu Y., Wu S., Cheng S., Lu Y., et al. A retrospective review of non-intestinal-type adenocarcinoma of nasal cavity and paranasal sinus. Oncol. Lett. 2023;25:132. doi: 10.3892/ol.2023.13718. PubMed DOI PMC
Franchi A., Gallo O., Santucci M. Clinical relevance of the histological classification of sinonasal intestinal type adenocarcinomas. Hum. Pathol. 1999;30:1140–1145. doi: 10.1016/S0046-8177(99)90029-1. PubMed DOI
Fiaux Camous D., Chevret S., Oker N., Turri Zanoni M., Lombardi D., Choussy O., Frederic D., Jorissen M., de Gabory L., Malard O., et al. Prognostic value of the seventh AJCC/UICC TNM classification of intestinal type ethmoid adenocarcinoma: Systematic review and risk prediction model. Head Neck. 2017;39:668–678. doi: 10.1002/hed.24663. PubMed DOI
Leivo I. Intestinal-Type Adenocarcinoma: Classification, Immunophenotype, Molecular Features and Differential Diagnosis. Head Neck Pathol. 2017;11:295–300. doi: 10.1007/s12105-017-0800-7. PubMed DOI PMC
Burke H.B. Predicting Clinical Outcomes Using Molecular Biomarkers. Biomark. Cancer. 2016;8:89–99. doi: 10.4137/BIC.S33380. PubMed DOI PMC
Tomasetti M., Monaco F., Rubini C., Rossato M., De Quattro C., Beltrami C., Sollini G., Pasquini E., Amati M., Goteri G., et al. AGO2-RIP-Seq reveals miR-34/miR-449 cluster targetome in sinonasal cancers. PLoS ONE. 2024;19:e0295997. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295997. PubMed DOI PMC
Gioacchini F.M., Di Stadio A., De Luca P., Camaioni A., Pace A., Iannella G., Rubini C., Santarelli M., Tomasetti M., Scarpa A., et al. A pilot study to evaluate the expression of microRNA-let-7a in patients with intestinal-type sinonasal adenocarcinoma. Oncol. Lett. 2023;2:69. doi: 10.3892/ol.2023.14202. PubMed DOI PMC
Re M., Tomasetti M., Monaco F., Amati M., Rubini C., Foschini M.P., Sollini G., Gioacchini F.M., Pasquini E., Santarelli L. NGS-based miRNome identifies miR-449 cluster as marker of malignant transformation of sinonasal inverted papilloma. Oral Oncol. 2021;122:105554. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105554. PubMed DOI
Re M., Tomasetti M., Monaco F., Amati M., Rubini C., Sollini G., Bajraktari A., Gioacchini F.M., Santarelli L., Pasquini E. MiRNome analysis identifying miR-205 and miR-449a as biomarkers of disease progression in intestinal-type sinonasal adenocarcinoma. Head Neck. 2022;44:18–33. doi: 10.1002/hed.26894. PubMed DOI PMC
Tomasetti M., Re M., Monaco F., Gaetani S., Rubini C., Bertini A., Pasquini E., Bersaglieri C., Bracci M., Staffolani S., et al. MiR-126 in intestinal-type sinonasal adenocarcinomas: Exosomal transfer of MiR-126 promotes anti-tumour responses. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:896. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4801-z. PubMed DOI PMC
Veuger J., Kuipers N.C., Willems S.M., Halmos G.B. Tumor Markers and Their Prognostic Value in Sinonasal ITAC/Non-ITAC. Cancers. 2023;15:3201. doi: 10.3390/cancers15123201. PubMed DOI PMC
Najafi M., Farhood B., Mortezaee K. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) in cancer progression and therapy. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019;234:8381–8395. doi: 10.1002/jcp.27740. PubMed DOI
Van Schaijik B., Davis P.F., Wickremesekera A.C., Tan S.T., Itinteang T. Subcellular localisation of the stem cell markers OCT4, SOX2, NANOG, KLF4 and c-MYC in cancer: A review. J. Clin. Pathol. 2018;71:88–91. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2017-204815. PubMed DOI
Yang L., Shi P., Zhao G., Xu J., Peng W., Zhang J., Zhang G., Wang X., Dong Z., Chen F., et al. Targeting cancer stem cell pathways for cancer therapy. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 2020;5:8. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-0110-5. PubMed DOI PMC
Dallan I., Fiacchini G., Tricò D., Barucco M., Turri-Zanoni M., Ferrari M., Di Girolami L., Schiavo G., Emanuelli E., Mattavelli D., et al. Sinonasal intestinal-type adenocarcinoma: Multi-institutional retrospective analysis based on 440 patients with long-term follow-up. Eur. J. Cancer. 2025;226:115623. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115623. PubMed DOI
Perez Ordonez B., Huynh N.N., Berean K.W., Jordan R.C. Expression of mismatch repair proteins, beta catenin, and E cadherin in intestinal type sinonasal adenocarcinoma. J. Clin. Pathol. 2004;57:1080–1083. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2004.018051. PubMed DOI PMC
Kennedy M.T., Jordan R.C., Berean K.W., Perez Ordonez B. Expression pattern of CK7, CK20, CDX 2, and villin in intestinal type sinonasal adenocarcinoma. J. Clin. Pathol. 2004;57:932–937. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2004.016964. PubMed DOI PMC
Ghaleb A.M., Yang V.W. Kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4): What we currently know. Gene. 2017;611:27–37. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2017.02.025. PubMed DOI PMC
Shie J.L., Chen Z.Y., Fu M., Pestell R.G., Tseng C.C. Gut-enriched Kruppel-like factor represses cyclin D1 promoter activity through Sp1 motif. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:2969–2976. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.15.2969. PubMed DOI PMC
Cai W., Jing M., Wen J., Guo H., Xue Z. Epigenetic Alterations of DNA Methylation and miRNA Contribution to Lung Adenocarcinoma. Front. Genet. 2022;13:817552. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.817552. PubMed DOI PMC
Li W., Liu M., Su Y., Zhou X., Liu Y., Zhang X. The Janus-faced roles of Krüppel-like factor 4 in oral squamous cell carcinoma cells. Oncotarget. 2015;6:44480–44494. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6256. PubMed DOI PMC
Yu F., Li J., Chen H., Fu J., Ray S., Huang S., Zheng H., Ai W. Kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) is required for maintenance of breast cancer stem cells and for cell migration and invasion. Oncogene. 2011;30:2161–2172. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.591. PubMed DOI PMC
Tai S.K., Yang M.H., Chang S.Y., Chang Y.C., Li W.Y., Tsai T.L., Wang Y.F., Chu P.Y., Hsieh S.L. Persistent Kruppel-like factor 4 expression predicts progression and poor prognosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2011;102:895–902. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.01859.x. PubMed DOI PMC
Saito M. Novel Roles of Nanog in Cancer Cells and Their Extracellular Vesicles. Cells. 2022;11:3881. doi: 10.3390/cells11233881. PubMed DOI PMC
Grubelnik G., Boštjančič E., Grošelj A., Zidar N. Expression of NANOG and its regulation in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Biomed. Res. Int. 2020;2020:8573793. doi: 10.1155/2020/8573793. PubMed DOI PMC
Pedregal-Mallo D., Hermida-Prado F., Granda-Díaz R., Montoro-Jiménez I., Allonca E., Pozo-Agundo E., Álvarez-Fernández M., Álvarez-Marcos C., García-Pedrero J.M., Rodrigo J.P. Prognostic significance of the pluripotency factors NANOG, SOX2, and OCT4 in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Cancers. 2020;12:1794. doi: 10.3390/cancers12071794. PubMed DOI PMC
Nirala B.K., Yustein J.T. The Role of MYC in Tumor Immune Microenvironment Regulation: Insights and Future Directions. Front. Biosci. 2025;30:37304. doi: 10.31083/FBL37304. PubMed DOI
Ahmadi S.E., Rahimi S., Zarandi B., Chegeni R., Safa M. MYC: A multipurpose oncogene with prognostic and therapeutic implications in blood malignancies. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2021;14:121. doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01111-4. PubMed DOI PMC
Muthalagu N., Junttila M.R., Wiese K.E., Wolf E., Morton J., Bauer B., Evan G.I., Eilers M., Murphy D.J. BIM is the primary mediator of MYC-induced apoptosis in multiple solid tissues. Cell. Rep. 2014;8:1347–1353. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.07.057. PubMed DOI PMC
Chen W., Wang Y.J. Multifaceted roles of OCT4 in tumor microenvironment: Biology and therapeutic implications. Oncogene. 2025;44:1213–1229. doi: 10.1038/s41388-025-03408-x. PubMed DOI
Zhao X., Lu H., Sun Y., Liu L., Wang H. Prognostic value of octamer binding transcription factor 4 for patients with solid tumors: A meta-analysis. Medicine. 2020;99:e22804. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022804. PubMed DOI PMC
Wuebben E.L., Rizzino A. The dark side of SOX2: Cancer—A comprehensive overview. Oncotarget. 2017;8:44917–44943. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16570. PubMed DOI PMC
Gwak J.M., Kim M., Kim H.J., Jang M.H., Park S.Y. Expression of embryonal stem cell transcription factors in breast cancer: Oct4 as an indicator for poor clinical outcome and tamoxifen resistance. Oncotarget. 2017;8:36305–36318. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16750. PubMed DOI PMC
Hushmandi K., Saadat S.H., Mirilavasani S., Daneshi S., Aref A.R., Nabavi N., Raesi R., Taheriazam A., Hashemi M. The multifaceted role of SOX2 in breast and lung cancer dynamics. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2024;260:155386. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2024.155386. PubMed DOI
Tang X.B., Shen X.H., Li L., Zhang Y.F., Chen G.Q. SOX2 overexpression correlates with poor prognosis in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2013;40:481–486. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2013.01.003. PubMed DOI
González-Márquez R., Llorente J.L., Rodrigo J.P., García-Pedrero J.M., Álvarez-Marcos C., Suárez C., Hermsen M.A. SOX2 expression in hypopharyngeal, laryngeal, and sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma. Hum. Pathol. 2014;45:851–857. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2013.12.004. PubMed DOI
Schröck A., Göke F., Wagner P., Bode M., Franzen A., Braun M., Huss S., Agaimy A., Ihrler S., Menon R., et al. Sex determining region Y-box 2 (SOX2) amplification is an independent indicator of disease recurrence in sinonasal cancer. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e59201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059201. PubMed DOI PMC
López L., Fernández-Vañes L., Cabal V.N., García-Marín R., Suárez-Fernández L., Codina-Martínez H., Lorenzo-Guerra S.L., Vivanco B., Blanco-Lorenzo V., Llorente J.L., et al. Sox2 and βIII-Tubulin as Biomarkers of Drug Resistance in Poorly Differentiated Sinonasal Carcinomas. J. Pers. Med. 2023;13:1504. doi: 10.3390/jpm13101504. PubMed DOI PMC
Yue H., Hu Z., Hu R., Guo Z., Zheng Y., Wang Y., Zhou Y. ALDH1A1 in Cancers: Bidirectional Function, Drug Resistance, and Regulatory Mechanism. Front. Oncol. 2022;12:918778. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.918778. PubMed DOI PMC
Sjöström M., Hartman L., Honeth G., Grabau D., Malmström P., Hegardt C., Fernö M., Niméus E. Stem cell biomarker ALDH1A1 in breast cancer shows an association with prognosis and clinicopathological variables that is highly cut-off dependent. J. Clin. Pathol. 2015;68:1012–1019. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2015-203092. PubMed DOI