Establishing standardized transthoracic echocardiography reference ranges for mouse models: insights into the impact of anesthesia, sex, and age

. 2025 ; 12 () : 1695034. [epub] 20251219

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic-ecollection

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid41488462

Grantová podpora
UM1 OD023222 NIH HHS - United States
UM1 OD023221 NIH HHS - United States
U54 HG006364 NHGRI NIH HHS - United States
UM1 HG006370 NHGRI NIH HHS - United States
U42 OD011175 NIH HHS - United States

INTRODUCTION: Mouse models play a critical role in cardiology research, offering valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms, genetics, and potential treatments for cardiovascular diseases. However, the ability to transfer findings in mice between studies is limited by the absence of standardized protocols and valid reference values for the assessment of normal cardiac function in mice. This study aims to establish comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) reference ranges for mice, particularly focusing on C57BL/6N wild-type controls. METHODS: The study, which includes data from over 15,000 mice through the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium (IMPC), highlights how variables such as sex, age, body weight, and anesthesia impact TTE parameters. RESULTS: The findings showed that anesthesia is the primary predictor of variability in cardiac function. Isoflurane- and tribromoethanol-anesthetized mice presented with modified cardiac function compared with conscious mice. In addition, we observed minimal sex differences in cardiac morphology and function, except for small variations influenced by anesthesia. The effects of aging on cardiac function were modest, characterized by a decrease in heart rate and subtle changes in ventricular dimensions without evidence of pathological remodeling, possibly attributable to disease-free cardiovascular aging. DISCUSSION: Validation of the reference ranges across multiple mouse strains showed that these values provide a reliable baseline for experiments involving cardiac function in mice. The data underscore the importance of using anesthesia-specific reference values when interpreting TTE results, ensuring robust comparisons in genetic and pharmacological studies. These reference ranges serve as quality assurance tools for future cardiac studies in mice, offering insights into typical TTE parameter values, supporting the detection of experimental perturbations, and contributing to more effective translation of findings from mice to humans.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Nyberg J, Jakobsen EO, Østvik A, Holte E, Stølen S, Lovstakken L, et al. Echocardiographic reference ranges of global longitudinal strain for all cardiac chambers using guideline-directed dedicated views. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. (2023) 16:1516–31. 10.1016/j.jcmg.2023.08.011 PubMed DOI

Eriksen-Volnes T, Grue JF, Hellum Olaisen S, Letnes JM, Nes B, Løvstakken L, et al. Normalized echocardiographic values from guideline-directed dedicated views for cardiac dimensions and left ventricular function. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. (2023) 16:1501–15. 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.12.020 PubMed DOI

Ahn Y, Koo HJ, Lee SA, Jung D, Kang JW, Yang DH. Reference ranges of computed tomography-derived strains in four cardiac chambers. PLoS One. (2024) 19:e0303986. 10.1371/journal.pone.0303986 PubMed DOI PMC

Pfaffenberger S, Bartko P, Graf A, Pernicka E, Babayev J, Lolic E, et al. Size matters! Impact of age, sex, height, and weight on the normal heart size. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. (2013) 6:1073–9. 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.000690 PubMed DOI

Lancellotti P, Badano LP, Lang RM, Akhaladze N, Athanassopoulos GD, Barone D, et al. Normal reference ranges for echocardiography: rationale, study design, and methodology (NORRE study). Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. (2013) 14:303–8. 10.1093/ehjci/jet008 PubMed DOI

Dobrev D, Wehrens XHT. Mouse models of cardiac arrhythmias. Circ Res. (2018) 123:332–4. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313406 PubMed DOI PMC

Lindsey ML, Brunt KR, Kirk JA, Kleinbongard P, Calvert JW, de Castro Brás LE, et al. Guidelines for PubMed DOI PMC

Withaar C, Lam CSP, Schiattarella GG, de Boer RA, Meems LMG. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in humans and mice: embracing clinical complexity in mouse models. Eur Heart J. (2021) 42:4420–30. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab389 PubMed DOI PMC

Zacchigna S, Paldino A, Falcão-Pires I, Daskalopoulos EP, Dal Ferro M, Vodret S, et al. Towards standardization of echocardiography for the evaluation of left ventricular function in adult rodents: a position paper of the ESC working group on myocardial function. Cardiovasc Res. (2021) 117:43–59. 10.1093/cvr/cvaa110 PubMed DOI

O’Riordan CE, Trochet P, Steiner M, Fuchs D. Standardisation and future of preclinical echocardiography. Mamm Genome. (2023) 34:123–55. 10.1007/s00335-023-09981-4 PubMed DOI

Gao S, Ho D, Vatner DE, Vatner SF. Echocardiography in mice. Curr Protoc Mouse Biol. (2011) 1:71–83. 10.1002/9780470942390.mo100130 PubMed DOI PMC

Robinson NB, Krieger K, Khan FM, Huffman W, Chang M, Naik A, et al. The current state of animal models in research: a review. Int J Surg. (2019) 72:9–13. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.10.015 PubMed DOI

Domínguez-Oliva A, Hernández-Ávalos I, Martínez-Burnes J, Olmos-Hernández A, Verduzco-Mendoza A, Mota-Rojas D. The importance of animal models in biomedical research: current insights and applications. Animals (Basel). (2023) 13:1223. 10.3390/ani13071223 PubMed DOI PMC

Rottman JN, Ni G, Brown M. Echocardiographic evaluation of ventricular function in mice. Echocardiography. (2007) 24:83–9. 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2006.00356.x PubMed DOI

Stypmann J, Engelen MA, Epping C, van Rijen HV, Milberg P, Bruch C, et al. Age and gender related reference values for transthoracic Doppler-echocardiography in the anesthetized CD1 mouse. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. (2006) 22:353–62. 10.1007/s10554-005-9052-9 PubMed DOI

Vinhas M, Araújo AC, Ribeiro S, Rosário LB, Belo JA. Transthoracic echocardiography reference values in juvenile and adult 129/Sv mice. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. (2013) 11:12. 10.1186/1476-7120-11-12 PubMed DOI PMC

Dickinson ME, Flenniken AM, Ji X, Teboul L, Wong MD, White JK, et al. High-throughput discovery of novel developmental phenotypes. Nature. (2016) 537:508–14. 10.1038/nature19356 PubMed DOI PMC

Muñoz-Fuentes V, Cacheiro P, Meehan TF, Aguilar-Pimentel JA, Brown SDM, Flenniken AM, et al. The international mouse phenotyping consortium (IMPC): a functional catalogue of the mammalian genome that informs conservation. Conserv Genet. (2018) 19:995–1005. 10.1007/s10592-018-1072-9 PubMed DOI PMC

Brown SDM, Chambon P, de Angelis MH, Eumorphia C. EMPReSS: standardized phenotype screens for functional annotation of the mouse genome. Nat Genet. (2005) 37:1155. 10.1038/ng1105-1155 PubMed DOI

Threadgill DW, Miller DR, Churchill GA, de Villena FP. The collaborative cross: a recombinant inbred mouse population for the systems genetic era. ILAR J. (2011) 52:24–31. 10.1093/ilar.52.1.24 PubMed DOI

Lindovsky J, Nichtova Z, Dragano NRV, Pajuelo Reguera D, Prochazka J, Fuchs H, et al. A review of standardized high-throughput cardiovascular phenotyping with a link to metabolism in mice. Mamm Genome. (2023) 34:107–22. 10.1007/s00335-023-09997-w PubMed DOI PMC

Teichholz LE, Kreulen T, Herman MV, Gorlin R. Problems in echocardiographic volume determinations: echocardiographic-angiographic correlations in the presence of absence of asynergy. Am J Cardiol. (1976) 37:7–11. 10.1016/0002-9149(76)90491-4 PubMed DOI

R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; (2024). Available online at: https://www.r-project.org/ (Accessed June 01, 2024).

Groemping U. Relative importance for linear regression in R: the package relaimpo. J Stat Softw. (2006) 17(1):1–27. 10.18637/jss.v017.i01 DOI

Zhang X, Astivia OLO, Kroc E, Zumbo BD. How to think clearly about the central limit theorem. Psychol Methods. (2023) 28:1427–45. 10.1037/met0000448 PubMed DOI

Coefficient of Variation. The Concise Encyclopedia of Statistics. New York, NY: Springer New York; (2008). p. 95–6.

S.L.R.E.a.A. Williams (Ed.). Eurachem/CITAC Guide: Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement. Teddington: Eurachem; (2012). Available online at: https://www.eurachem.org/ (Accessed September 01, 2024).

Pearson K. VII Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents. Proc R Soc Lond. (1895) 58:240–2. 10.1098/rspl.1895.0041 DOI

Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA. Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg. (2018) 126:1763–8. 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864 PubMed DOI

Akoglu H. User’s guide to correlation coefficients. Turk J Emerg Med. (2018) 18:91–3. 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001 PubMed DOI PMC

Galderisi M, Cosyns B, Edvardsen T, Cardim N, Delgado V, Di Salvo G, et al. Standardization of adult transthoracic echocardiography reporting in agreement with recent chamber quantification, diastolic function, and heart valve disease recommendations: an expert consensus document of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. (2017) 18:1301–10. 10.1093/ehjci/jex244 PubMed DOI

Boyd AC, Schiller NB, Thomas L. Principles of transthoracic echocardiographic evaluation. Nat Rev Cardiol. (2015) 12:426–40. 10.1038/nrcardio.2015.57 PubMed DOI

Douglas PS, Carabello BA, Lang RM, Lopez L, Pellikka PA, Picard MH, et al. 2019 ACC/AHA/ASE key data elements and definitions for transthoracic echocardiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical data standards (writing committee to develop clinical data standards for transthoracic echocardiography) and the American Society of Echocardiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. (2019) 12:e000027. 10.1161/HCI.0000000000000027 PubMed DOI

Heidenreich P. What is a normal left ventricular ejection fraction? Circulation. (2023) 148:750–2. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.065791 PubMed DOI

The Echocardiographic Normal Ranges Meta-Analysis of the Left heart (EchoNoRMAL) Collaboration. A meta-analysis of echocardiographic measurements of the left heart for the development of normative reference ranges in a large international cohort: the EchoNoRMAL study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. (2014) 15:341–8. 10.1093/ehjci/jet240 PubMed DOI

Echocardiographic Normal Ranges Meta-Analysis of the Left Heart Collaboration. Ethnic-Specific normative reference values for echocardiographic LA and LV size, LV mass, and systolic function: the EchoNoRMAL study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. (2015) 8:656–65. 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.02.014 PubMed DOI

Wehner GJ, Jing L, Haggerty CM, Suever JD, Leader JB, Hartzel DN, et al. Routinely reported ejection fraction and mortality in clinical practice: where does the nadir of risk lie? Eur Heart J. (2020) 41:1249–57. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz550 PubMed DOI PMC

Kondo T, Dewan P, Anand IS, Desai AS, Packer M, Zile MR, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with heart failure: are there thresholds and inflection points in left ventricular ejection fraction and thresholds justifying a clinical classification? Circulation. (2023) 148:732–49. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.063642 PubMed DOI

Cain PA, Ahl R, Hedstrom E, Ugander M, Allansdotter-Johnsson A, Friberg P, et al. Age and gender specific normal values of left ventricular mass, volume and function for gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging: a cross sectional study. BMC Med Imaging. (2009) 9:2. 10.1186/1471-2342-9-2 PubMed DOI PMC

Jasaityte R, D'Hooge J, Herbots L, Daraban A, Rademakers F, Claus P. Normal changes of LV contractility with ageing: an echocardiographic study. Eur Heart J. (2013) 34:P3855. 10.1093/eurheartj/eht309.P3855 DOI

Harkness A, Ring L, Augustine DX, Oxborough D, Robinson S, Sharma V. Normal reference intervals for cardiac dimensions and function for use in echocardiographic practice: a guideline from the British Society of Echocardiography. Echo Res Prac. (2020) 7:G1–18. 10.1530/ERP-19-0050 PubMed DOI PMC

Cerbu M, Cerbu C, Papuc I. M-mode echocardiography in canine veterinary practice: a comprehensive review of left ventricular measurements in 44 different dog breeds. Animals (Basel). (2023) 13:2986. 10.3390/ani13182986 PubMed DOI PMC

Vernemmen I, Vera L, Van Steenkiste G, van Loon G, Decloedt A. Reference values for 2-dimensional and M-mode echocardiography in Friesian and Warmblood horses. J Vet Intern Med. (2020) 34:2701–9. 10.1111/jvim.15938 PubMed DOI PMC

Grenacher PA, Schwarzwald CC. Assessment of left ventricular size and function in horses using anatomical M-mode echocardiography. J Vet Cardiol. (2010) 12:111–21. 10.1016/j.jvc.2010.01.002 PubMed DOI

Galbas MC, Straky HC, Meissner F, Reuter J, Schimmel M, Grundmann S, et al. Cardiac dimensions and hemodynamics in healthy juvenile Landrace swine. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. (2024) 22:3. 10.1186/s12947-023-00321-9 PubMed DOI PMC

Konrad D, Weber K, Corney S, Allen TR, Terrier C. Echocardiography, color-coded Doppler imaging, and abdominal sonography, a non-invasive method for investigation of heart and aortic morphology and function in female Gottingen minipigs: method and reference values for M-mode, B-mode, and flow parameters. Comp Med. (2000) 50:405–9. PMID: 11020159 PubMed

Regitz-Zagrosek V, Gebhard C. Gender medicine: effects of sex and gender on cardiovascular disease manifestation and outcomes. Nat Rev Cardiol. (2023) 20:236–47. 10.1038/s41569-022-00797-4 PubMed DOI PMC

Karp NA, Mason J, Beaudet AL, Benjamini Y, Bower L, Braun RE, et al. Prevalence of sexual dimorphism in mammalian phenotypic traits. Nat Commun. (2017) 8:15475. 10.1038/ncomms15475 PubMed DOI PMC

Mensah GA, Fuster V. Sex and gender differences in cardiovascular health. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2022) 79:1385–7. 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.02.008 PubMed DOI

Pagel PS. Myocardial protection by volatile anesthetics in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a critical review of the laboratory and clinical evidence. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. (2013) 27:972–82. 10.1053/j.jvca.2012.10.011 PubMed DOI

Qin H, Zhou J. Myocardial protection by desflurane: from basic mechanisms to clinical applications. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. (2023) 82:169–79. 10.1097/FJC.0000000000001448 PubMed DOI

De Hert SG. Volatile anesthetics and cardiac function. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. (2006) 10:33–42. 10.1177/108925320601000107 PubMed DOI

Abraham AS, Elliott CW, Abraham MS, Ahuja S. Intra-operative anesthetic induced myocardial protection during cardiothoracic surgery: a literature review. J Thorac Dis. (2023) 15:7042–9. 10.21037/jtd-23-1101 PubMed DOI PMC

Lin E, Symons JA. Volatile anaesthetic myocardial protection: a review of the current literature. HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth. (2010) 2:105–9.PMID: 23440181 PubMed PMC

Abdellatif M, Rainer PP, Sedej S, Kroemer G. Hallmarks of cardiovascular ageing. Nat Rev Cardiol. (2023) 20:754–77. 10.1038/s41569-023-00881-3 PubMed DOI

Dai D-F, Rabinovitch PS. Cardiac aging in mice and humans: the role of mitochondrial oxidative stress. Trends Cardiovasc Med. (2009) 19:213–20. 10.1016/j.tcm.2009.12.004 PubMed DOI PMC

Peters CH, Sharpe EJ, Proenza C. Cardiac pacemaker activity and aging. Annu Rev Physiol. (2020) 82:21–43. 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021119-034453 PubMed DOI PMC

Xie K, Fuchs H, Scifo E, Liu D, Aziz A, Aguilar-Pimentel JA, et al. Deep phenotyping and lifetime trajectories reveal limited effects of longevity regulators on the aging process in C57BL/6J mice. Nat Commun. (2022) 13:6830. 10.1038/s41467-022-34515-y PubMed DOI PMC

Obas V, Vasan RS. The aging heart. Clin Sci (Lond). (2018) 132:1367–82. 10.1042/CS20171156 PubMed DOI

Tracy E, Rowe G, LeBlanc AJ. Cardiac tissue remodeling in healthy aging: the road to pathology. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. (2020) 319:C166–82. 10.1152/ajpcell.00021.2020 PubMed DOI PMC

Kollmus H, Fuchs H, Lengger C, Haselimashhadi H, Bogue MA, Östereicher MA, et al. A comprehensive and comparative phenotypic analysis of the collaborative founder strains identifies new and known phenotypes. Mamm Genome. (2020) 31:30–48. 10.1007/s00335-020-09827-3 PubMed DOI PMC

Solberg HE. Approved recommendation (1986) on the theory of reference values. Part 1. The concept of reference values. Clin Chim Acta. (1987) 165:111–8. 10.1016/0009-8981(87)90224-5 PubMed DOI

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...