BACKGROUND: Aveir DR (Abbott, Abbott Park, IL) is a dual-chamber leadless pacemaker (LP) system with distinct atrial and ventricular LPs (ALP, VLP) that communicate wirelessly to deliver atrioventricular synchronous pacing. Success rates of these implant-to-implant (i2i) transmissions have not been systematically evaluated. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate chronic i2i success rates in a clinical setting. METHODS: Patients meeting standard dual-chamber pacing indications were enrolled and implanted with dual-chamber LP systems as part of a prospective international clinical trial (Aveir DR i2i Study). The percent of successful i2i transmissions from ALP-to-VLP (A-to-V) and VLP-to-ALP (V-to-A) were interrogated from LPs in de novo patients using the device programmer at implant, discharge, and at 1, 3, and 6 months postimplant (1M, 3M, 6M). RESULTS: A total of 399 patients completed device implant and i2i diagnostic interrogation (62% male; age 69 years; 65% sinus node dysfunction, 32% atrioventricular [AV] block). Median A-to-V and V-to-A i2i success rates exceeded 90% of beats at all time-points from implant to 6M. The minority of patients with A-to-V or V-to-A i2i success in <70% of beats at implant (A-to-V: 19% of patients, V-to-A: 31% of patients) showed roughly 40% improvement by 1M, with this minority dropping to roughly 5% of patients by 6M. Improvement in i2i communication success may be attributed to reprogramming of i2i setting levels, natural changes in dominant posture, and device stabilization. CONCLUSION: Wireless implant-to-implant communication in the new dual-chamber leadless pacemaker system demonstrated successful transmissions in >90% of beats throughout the 6-month evaluation period. Communication success improved significantly over time postimplant for specific subgroups. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Aveir DR i2i Study, ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05252702.

• MeSH
• Wireless Technology MeSH
• Equipment Design * MeSH
• Cardiac Pacing, Artificial methods   MeSH
• Pacemaker, Artificial * MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Follow-Up Studies MeSH
• Prospective Studies MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Check Tag
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH

AIMS: A dual-chamber leadless pacemaker (LP) system that employs distinct atrial and ventricular LP devices (ALP, VLP) has been introduced to clinical practice. Proprietary, low-energy, implant-to-implant (i2i) communication at each beat enables the devices to maintain synchronous atrioventricular sensing and pacing. We evaluated device longevities and contributing factors, such as i2i communication. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients meeting dual-chamber pacing indications received the dual-chamber LP system as part of a prospective, multi-centre, international clinical trial (Aveir DR i2i Study, NCT05252702). Programming and diagnostics were interrogated from all de novo, non-revised, dual-chamber programmed devices at 12 months post-implant. This analysis included 302 patients (65% male; age 70 ± 13 years; weight 80 ± 19 kg; intrinsic heart rate 55 ± 7 bpm; 58% sinus node dysfunction, 27% atrioventricular block). At 12 months, devices were programmed to dual-chamber pacing (DDD(R) or DDI(R)) at a median 60 bpm rate, median 1.25 V pulse amplitude in ALP and 1.5 V in VLP, median 0.4 ms pulse width, and median i2i signal setting level 5 out of 7. Median ALP and VLP remaining battery longevities at 12 months were 4.3 and 9.1 years, with median total ALP and VLP longevities of 5.3 and 9.9 years. Base rate, pulse amplitude, pacing percentage, event rate, impedance, and i2i setting level all exhibited significant correlations with ALP and VLP longevities (P < 0.001). Programming i2i setting levels below 7 produced the greatest longevity savings. CONCLUSION: The first dual-chamber LP demonstrated adequate projected battery longevity after 12 months of use. Patient-specific device programming considerations, unique to leadless devices, may extend longevity.

• MeSH
• Atrioventricular Block therapy   diagnosis   physiopathology   MeSH
• Time Factors MeSH
• Equipment Design MeSH
• Cardiac Pacing, Artificial * methods   MeSH
• Pacemaker, Artificial * MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Prospective Studies MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Arrhythmias, Cardiac * therapy   diagnosis   physiopathology   MeSH
• Heart Rate MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Electric Power Supplies * MeSH
• Check Tag
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Clinical Trial MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH

Up to one-third of patients referred for transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) have a transvalvular pacemaker (PPM) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead in place. Both the electrophysiology and interventional cardiology communities have been alerted to the complexity of decision-making in this situation due to potential interactions between the leads and the TTVI material, including the risk of jailing or damage to the leads. This document, commissioned by the European Heart Rhythm Association and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions of the ESC, reviews the scientific evidence to inform Heart Team discussions on the management of patients with a PPM or ICD who are scheduled for or have undergone TTVI.

• MeSH
• Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation * adverse effects   standards   methods   instrumentation   MeSH
• Defibrillators, Implantable * standards   MeSH
• Pacemaker, Artificial * standards   MeSH
• Consensus MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Risk Factors MeSH
• Cardiac Catheterization * adverse effects   standards   instrumentation   MeSH
• Tricuspid Valve * surgery   physiopathology   MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Practice Guideline MeSH

BACKGROUND: A dual-chamber leadless pacemaker can provide bradycardia therapy to most patients with pacemaker indications without the complications associated with a lead or pulse generator. We sought to confirm whether previously reported 3-month safety and performance outcomes were sustained through 12 months by determining whether 12-month complication-free and performance success rates exceeded their prespecified performance goals. METHODS: Patients were enrolled in the prospective, single-group Aveir DR i2i Study if they had a standard indication for dual-chamber pacing. Enrolled patients were implanted with an Aveir DR dual-chamber leadless pacemaker system, which comprised 2 communicating leadless pacemakers (1 in the right atrium and 1 in the right ventricle). The primary safety outcome evaluated whether freedom from serious device- or procedure-related events through 365 days exceeded the predetermined performance goal of 76.5%. The primary performance outcome determined whether the composite of atrial capture threshold (≤3.0 V at 0.4 ms) and sensing amplitude (P-wave ≥1.0 mV) at the 12-month visit exceeded the predetermined performance goal of 80.0%. RESULTS: Sites attempted implantation in 300 subjects, where 63.3% had sinus-node dysfunction and 33.3% had atrioventricular block as their primary pacing indication. The primary safety end point was achieved, with a Kaplan-Meier 12-month complication-free rate of 88.6% (95% CI, 84.5-91.8; P<0.001). The primary performance end point was achieved in 92.8% of patients (95% CI, 89.7-95.8; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both primary safety and performance end points were met after 1 year, demonstrating consistency with previously reported 3-month outcomes of a dual-chamber leadless pacemaker. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05252702.

• MeSH
• Atrioventricular Block * therapy   physiopathology   MeSH
• Bradycardia * therapy   physiopathology   diagnosis   MeSH
• Time Factors MeSH
• Equipment Design MeSH
• Cardiac Pacing, Artificial * adverse effects   methods   MeSH
• Pacemaker, Artificial * MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Prospective Studies MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Heart Rate * MeSH
• Sick Sinus Syndrome * therapy   physiopathology   diagnosis   MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH

BACKGROUND: The growing use of leadless pacemaker (LP) technology requires safe and effective solutions for retrieving and removing these devices over the long term. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate retrieval and removal of an active helix-fixation LP studied in worldwide regulatory clinical trials. METHODS: Subjects enrolled in the LEADLESS II phase 1 investigational device exemption, LEADLESS Observational, or LEADLESS Japan trials with an attempted LP retrieval at least 6 weeks postimplantation were included. The retrieval success rate was evaluated for all attempted retrievals. Site-reported complications associated with LP retrievals were quantified, with the severity and relationship adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee. RESULTS: There were 1,423 successful LP implants and 234 chronic LP retrieval attempts in 233 subjects. The overall retrieval success rate was 87.6% (205 of 234 attempts). The most common reason for failed retrieval (86.2%, 25 of 29 attempts) was inability to access the LP docking button. The mean time from implantation to attempted retrieval was 3.2 years (range 0.2-9.0 years) and did not significantly influence the retrieval success (P = 0.71). The clinical events committee adjudicated 11 complications in 9 subjects as being retrieval related (3.9%, 9 of 233 subjects). CONCLUSIONS: The safety and efficacy of chronic LP retrieval of an active helix-fixation device was demonstrated in an international clinical trial setting, with implant durations up to 9 years.

• MeSH
• Equipment Design MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Pacemaker, Artificial * MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Device Removal * methods   MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Check Tag
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH

In a pivotal trial (NCT05252702), the AVEIR DR (Abbott) leadless pacemaker system was found to be safe and effective in delivering DDDR synchronous atrial and ventricular pacing. This dual-chamber system employs 2 leadless pacemakers with implant-to-implant communication. Although implantation of the ventricular device as a single-chamber pacemaker has been well described, there are additional considerations surrounding the dual-chamber implantation procedure. Herein, we review the dual-chamber leadless pacemaker implantation workflow while providing guidance to optimize safe and effective implantation procedures.

• MeSH
• Equipment Design * MeSH
• Prosthesis Implantation methods   instrumentation   MeSH
• Cardiac Pacing, Artificial methods   MeSH
• Pacemaker, Artificial * MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Review MeSH

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an emerging technology for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF), for which pre-clinical and early-stage clinical data are suggestive of some degree of preferentiality to myocardial tissue ablation without damage to adjacent structures. Here in the MANIFEST-17K study we assessed the safety of PFA by studying the post-approval use of this treatment modality. Of the 116 centers performing post-approval PFA with a pentaspline catheter, data were received from 106 centers (91.4% participation) regarding 17,642 patients undergoing PFA (mean age 64, 34.7% female, 57.8% paroxysmal AF and 35.2% persistent AF). No esophageal complications, pulmonary vein stenosis or persistent phrenic palsy was reported (transient palsy was reported in 0.06% of patients; 11 of 17,642). Major complications, reported for ~1% of patients (173 of 17,642), were pericardial tamponade (0.36%; 63 of 17,642) and vascular events (0.30%; 53 of 17,642). Stroke was rare (0.12%; 22 of 17,642) and death was even rarer (0.03%; 5 of 17,642). Unexpected complications of PFA were coronary arterial spasm in 0.14% of patients (25 of 17,642) and hemolysis-related acute renal failure necessitating hemodialysis in 0.03% of patients (5 of 17,642). Taken together, these data indicate that PFA demonstrates a favorable safety profile by avoiding much of the collateral damage seen with conventional thermal ablation. PFA has the potential to be transformative for the management of patients with AF.

• MeSH
• Atrial Fibrillation * surgery   therapy   MeSH
• Catheter Ablation * adverse effects   methods   MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Postoperative Complications epidemiology   etiology   MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH

BACKGROUND: The first dual-chamber leadless pacemaker (DC-LP) system consists of 2 separate atrial and ventricular devices that communicate to maintain synchronous atrioventricular pacing and sensing. The initial safety and efficacy were previously reported. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the chronic electrical performance of the DC-LP system. METHODS: Patients meeting standard dual-chamber pacing indications were enrolled and implanted with the DC-LP system (Aveir DR, Abbott), including right atrial and ventricular helix-fixation LPs (atrial leadless pacemaker [ALP], ventricular leadless pacemaker [VLP]). Pacing capture threshold, sensed amplitude, and pacing impedance were collected using the device programmer at prespecified timepoints from 0-6 months postimplant. RESULTS: De novo devices were successfully implanted in 381 patients with complete 6-month data (62% male; age 69 ± 14 years; weight 82 ± 20 kg; 65% sinus nodal dysfunction, 30% atrioventricular block). ALPs were implanted predominantly in the right atrial appendage anterior base and VLPs primarily at the mid-to-apical right ventricular septum. From implant to 1 month, pacing capture thresholds (0.4-ms pulse width) improved in both ALPs (2.4 ± 1.5 V to 0.8 ± 0.8 V; P <.001) and VLPs (0.8 ± 0.6 V to 0.6 ± 0.4 V; P <.001). Sensed amplitudes improved in both ALPs (1.8 ± 1.3 mV to 3.4 ± 1.9 mV; P <.001) and VLPs (8.8 ± 4.0 mV to 11.7 ± 4.2 mV; P <.001). Impedances were stable in ALPs (334 ± 68 Ω to 329 ± 52 Ω; P = .17) and reduced in VLPs (789 ± 351 Ω to 646 ± 190 Ω; P <.001). Electrical measurements remained relatively stable from 1-6 months postimplant. No differences in electrical metrics were observed among ALP or VLP implant locations. CONCLUSION: This first in-human evaluation of the new dual-chamber leadless pacemaker system demonstrated reliable electrical performance throughout the initial 6-month evaluation period.

• MeSH
• Atrioventricular Block therapy   physiopathology   MeSH
• Time Factors MeSH
• Equipment Design * MeSH
• Cardiac Pacing, Artificial * methods   MeSH
• Pacemaker, Artificial * MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Follow-Up Studies MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Heart Ventricles physiopathology   MeSH
• Sick Sinus Syndrome therapy   physiopathology   MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH

BACKGROUND: Single-chamber ventricular leadless pacemakers do not support atrial pacing or consistent atrioventricular synchrony. A dual-chamber leadless pacemaker system consisting of two devices implanted percutaneously, one in the right atrium and one in the right ventricle, would make leadless pacemaker therapy a treatment option for a wider range of indications. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, single-group study to evaluate the safety and performance of a dual-chamber leadless pacemaker system. Patients with a conventional indication for dual-chamber pacing were eligible for participation. The primary safety end point was freedom from complications (i.e., device- or procedure-related serious adverse events) at 90 days. The first primary performance end point was a combination of adequate atrial capture threshold and sensing amplitude at 3 months. The second primary performance end point was at least 70% atrioventricular synchrony at 3 months while the patient was sitting. RESULTS: Among the 300 patients enrolled, 190 (63.3%) had sinus-node dysfunction and 100 (33.3%) had atrioventricular block as the primary pacing indication. The implantation procedure was successful (i.e., two functioning leadless pacemakers were implanted and had established implant-to-implant communication) in 295 patients (98.3%). A total of 35 device- or procedure-related serious adverse events occurred in 29 patients. The primary safety end point was met in 271 patients (90.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 87.0 to 93.7), which exceeded the performance goal of 78% (P<0.001). The first primary performance end point was met in 90.2% of the patients (95% CI, 86.8 to 93.6), which exceeded the performance goal of 82.5% (P<0.001). The mean (±SD) atrial capture threshold was 0.82±0.70 V, and the mean P-wave amplitude was 3.58±1.88 mV. Of the 21 patients (7%) with a P-wave amplitude of less than 1.0 mV, none required device revision for inadequate sensing. At least 70% atrioventricular synchrony was achieved in 97.3% of the patients (95% CI, 95.4 to 99.3), which exceeded the performance goal of 83% (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The dual-chamber leadless pacemaker system met the primary safety end point and provided atrial pacing and reliable atrioventricular synchrony for 3 months after implantation. (Funded by Abbott Medical; Aveir DR i2i ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05252702.).

• MeSH
• Atrioventricular Block therapy   MeSH
• Atrial Fibrillation therapy   etiology   MeSH
• Cardiac Pacing, Artificial * adverse effects   methods   MeSH
• Pacemaker, Artificial * adverse effects   MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Follow-Up Studies MeSH
• Prospective Studies MeSH
• Arrhythmias, Cardiac * therapy   MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Clinical Study MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH

AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) upgrades may be less likely to improve following intervention. Leadless left ventricular (LV) endocardial pacing has been used for patients with previously failed CRT or high-risk upgrades. We compared procedural and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing coronary sinus (CS) CRT upgrades with high-risk and previously failed CRT upgrades undergoing LV endocardial upgrades. METHOD AND RESULTS: Prospective consecutive CS upgrades between 2015 and 2019 were compared with those undergoing WiSE-CRT implantation. Cardiac resynchronization therapy response at 6 months was defined as improvement in clinical composite score (CCS) and a reduction in LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) ≥15%. A total of 225 patients were analysed; 121 CS and 104 endocardial upgrades. Patients receiving WiSE-CRT tended to have more comorbidities and were more likely to have previous cardiac surgery (30.9% vs. 16.5%; P = 0.012), hypertension (59.2% vs. 34.7%; P < 0.001), chronic obstructive airways disease (19.4% vs. 9.9%; P = 0.046), and chronic kidney disease (46.4% vs. 21.5%; P < 0.01) but similar LV ejection fraction (30.0 ± 8.3% vs. 29.5 ± 8.6%; P = 0.678). WiSE-CRT upgrades were successful in 97.1% with procedure-related mortality in 1.9%. Coronary sinus upgrades were successful in 97.5% of cases with a 2.5% rate of CS dissection and 5.6% lead malfunction/displacement. At 6 months, 91 WiSE-CRT upgrades and 107 CS upgrades had similar improvements in CCS (76.3% vs. 68.5%; P = 0.210) and reduction in LVESV ≥15% (54.2% vs. 56.3%; P = 0.835). CONCLUSION: Despite prior failed upgrades and high-risk patients with more comorbidities, WiSE-CRT upgrades had high rates of procedural success and similar improvements in CCS and LV remodelling with CS upgrades.

• MeSH
• Endocardium MeSH
• Coronary Sinus * diagnostic imaging   MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Prospective Studies MeSH
• Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy * MeSH
• Heart Failure * diagnosis   therapy   MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH