Purpose: The aim of the study is to evaluate the use of ultrasound imaging in diagnostics of Monteggia lesion in children where conventional radiographs and the use of the radiocapitellar line fail to provide an accurate diagnosis. Methods: Prospective diagnostic study of 70 patients treated between May 2018 and July 2021 in a pediatric level 1 trauma center. In 20 patients with the confirmed radiographic diagnosis of Monteggia lesion, an ultrasound of the humeroradial joint was performed to determine signs of both normal and dislocated elbow joint. In 36 patients with suspected humeroradial dislocation on plain radiographs, ultrasound imaging was performed to determine the definitive diagnosis. Overall, 14 patients with elbow joint injury other than humeroradial dislocation were excluded from the study. Results: The "double-hump sign" and the "congruency sign" were determined as normal findings on ultrasound of the humeroradial joint. These signs were applied to patients with unclear findings on radiographs. In three patients, the dislocation of the humeroradial joint was confirmed by ultrasound. In two patients, "defect in congruency sign" was seen during reduction despite normal radiographs, which required re-reduction. In 31 patients, dislocation of the humeroradial joint was refuted. In 34 out of the 36 patients, the diagnosis determined by ultrasound was confirmed in follow-up. Two patients did not attend the follow-up examination. Conclusion: Ultrasound imaging is an accessible, non-invasive, and dynamic point-of-care method that can be applied in children suffering from suspected humeroradial dislocation and/or subluxation. Level of evidence: Level III-diagnostic study.
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Purpose: The goal of this retrospective study was to compare the gradual lengthening of the ulna in children with multiple hereditary exostoses with and without an elastic intramedullary nail. Methods: Between 1998 to 2018, the ulna was lengthened in 28 forearms in 21 patients (aged 7.1 to 16.6 years) using a monolateral external fixator when relative ulnar shortening exceeded 15 mm. In total, 16 forearms were lengthened with the external fixator (group I) and 12 forearms with the addition of an intramedullary elastic nail (group II). Subjective assessment of function, range of movement (ROM) of the wrist and elbow and complications were compared. Ulnar shortening, radial head dislocation, radial articular angle (RAA) and percentage of carpal slip and radial bowing were followed radiographically. The difference between the groups has been evaluated statistically. Results: The function of the extremity improved partially in 81% of patients in group I and in 83% of patients in group II. ROM was not improved except for radial deviation. Radial head position did not change. The values in group II in comparison with group I are higher for gain of length and lower for bone lengthening index and for bone healing index. Carpal slip decreased insignificantly. The RAA and radial bowing decreased, the comparison of values between groups and age under and over ten years were not statistically significant. Complications were more common in group I. No permanent complications were noted. Conclusion: The addition of an intramedullary nail during the gradual ulnar lengthening improves the gain, bone healing index and rate of complications. Level of Evidence: III.
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Purpose: The aim of the study is to evaluate our group of paediatric patients with Monteggia lesion and its equivalents and to compare the characteristics of basic types of these lesions concerning therapeutic approach and results of the treatment. Methods: Retrospective study of 111 children treated in the Department of Pediatric and Trauma Surgery of the Thomayer Hospital in Prague between 2001 and 2013 (13 years). When evaluating the outcome of the therapy, Bruce's criteria modified by Letts that assesses range of movement, pain and deformity of the elbow joint were applied. Regarding the therapeutic approach, four groups were compared: nonoperative treatment, reduction and casting, closed reduction and internal fixation (CRIF) and opened reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Results were compared between three groups of patients (Monteggia lesions, displaced equivalents and non-displaced equivalents) using Fisher´s exact test with α set to 0.05. Results: In all, 46 patients were treated for (true) Monteggia lesion, 27 for non-displaced Monteggia equivalent and 38 for displaced equivalent. There is a statistically significant difference in therapeutic approach between all three groups of patients. There is no significant difference in outcome between Monteggia lesions and both types of Monteggia equivalents, but there is a statistically significant difference between displaced and non-displaced equivalents. Conclusion: There are only two lesions that meet the criteria of Monteggia - (true) Monteggia lesion and displaced Monteggia equivalent. The non-displaced equivalent does not meet the criteria of Monteggia and, therefore, should not be termed a Monteggia equivalent. Level of Evidence: Level III - Retrospective comparative study.
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
