BACKGROUND: A multicomponent meningococcal serogroups ABCWY vaccine (MenABCWY) could provide broad protection against disease-causing meningococcal strains and simplify the immunisation schedule. The aim of this trial was to confirm the effect of the licensed meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) vaccine, 4CMenB, against diverse MenB strains, and to assess the breadth of immune response against a panel of 110 MenB strains for MenABCWY containing the antigenic components of 4CMenB and licensed serogroups ACWY vaccine, MenACWY-CRM, the non-inferiority of the immune response with MenABCWY versus 4CMenB and MenACWY-CRM, safety, and MenABCWY lot-to-lot consistency. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3 randomised, controlled, observer-blinded trial of healthy adolescents and young adults (age 10-25 years) across 114 centres in Australia, Canada, Czechia, Estonia, Finland, Türkiye, and the USA. Exclusion criteria included previous vaccination with a MenB vaccine or (within the last 4 years) MenACWY vaccine. Participants were randomly allocated (5:5:3:3:3:1 ratio) via a central randomisation system using a minimisation procedure to receive 4CMenB at months 0, 2, and 6 (referred to as 4CMenB 0-2-6 hereafter); or 4CMenB at months 0 and 6 (referred to as 4CMenB 0-6 hereafter); or MenABCWY (three groups, each receiving one production lot of the MenACWY-CRM component) at months 0 and 6; or MenACWY-CRM at month 0. Demonstration in the per-protocol set of the consistency of three MenACWY-CRM component lots of the MenABCWY vaccine was a primary objective (demonstrated with two-sided 95% CIs for the ratio of human serum bactericidal antibody [hSBA] geometric mean titres against each serogroup within predefined criteria [0·5-2·0]). The primary endpoints (breadth of immune response) for the MenB component of MenABCWY and 4CMenB were measured using the endogenous complement hSBA (enc-hSBA) assay against a panel of 110 diverse MenB invasive disease strains. For each serum sample, 35 strains from the 110 MenB strain panel were randomly selected for testing. The 4CMenB breadth of immune response data have been published separately. For MenABCWY, breadth of immune response was assessed in two analyses: a test-based analysis of the percentage of samples (tests) without bactericidal serum activity against MenB strains 1 month after two MenABCWY doses versus the percentage after one MenACWY-CRM dose in the per-protocol set, and a responder-based analysis of the percentage of participants (responders) whose sera killed 70% or more strains at 1 month after two MenABCWY doses in the full analysis set. A lower limit of two-sided 95% CI above 65% would demonstrate breadth of immune response. Other primary outcomes included non-inferiority (5% margin) of two MenABCWY doses versus two 4CMenB doses by enc-hSBA assay in the per-protocol set, non-inferiority (10% margin) of two MenABCWY doses versus one MenACWY-CRM dose in MenACWY vaccine-naive participants by traditional hSBA assay in the per-protocol set, and safety in all vaccinated participants. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04502693, and is complete. FINDINGS: Between Aug 14, 2020, and Sept 3, 2021, 3651 participants were enrolled and randomly allocated (900 in the 4CMenB 0-2-6 group and 908 in the 4CMenB 0-6 group, 1666 in the three MenABCWY groups combined, and 177 in the MenACWY-CRM group). All primary objectives for MenABCWY were met. Consistency of immune responses against the three production lots of the MenACWY component of MenABCWY was demonstrated since two-sided 95% CIs for the ratios of hSBA geometric mean titres against serogroups A, C, W, and Y for each pair of lots were within the predefined equivalence criteria. The lot data were pooled for the remainder of MenABCWY endpoints. By enc-hSBA assay, breadth of immune response against the MenB strain panel was 77·9% (95% CI 76·6 to 79·2) in the test-based analysis and 84·1% (81·4 to 86·5; 687 of 817 participants) in the responder-based analysis. Non-inferiority of MenABCWY to 4CMenB was demonstrated by enc-hSBA assay: the difference in percentage of samples with bactericidal serum activity between the MenABCWY group (82·5% [95% CI 82·1 to 83·0]; 21 222 of 25 715) and 4CMenB 0-2 group (83·1% [82·7 to 83·6]; 22 921 of 27 569) was -0·61% (-1·25 to 0·03). Non-inferiority of two-dose MenABCWY to one-dose MenACWY-CRM was demonstrated by traditional hSBA assay, with differences between the MenABCWY group and MenACWY group in percentages of participants with a four-fold rise in hSBA titres of 11·3% (5·9 to 19·0) for serogroup A, 47·2% (38·1 to 56·3) for serogroup C, 35·3% (26·9 to 44·5) for serogroup W, and 27·0% (19·4 to 35·8) for serogroup Y. MenABCWY reactogenicity was mostly of mild or moderate severity and transient, with similar frequencies of adverse events in the MenABCWY and 4CMenB groups and no safety concerns were identified. INTERPRETATION: This study demonstrates breadth of immune response against a panel of 110 MenB strains for the MenB component of the investigational MenABCWY vaccine, when administered as a 0-6 months schedule to the target population of adolescents and young adults, with predefined criteria for success met for both breadth of immune response endpoints and for non-inferiority versus 4CMenB. This investigational vaccine could provide broad meningococcal serogroup coverage in a simplified immunisation schedule, thus aiding the public health attempt in preventing invasive meningococcal disease due to five Neisseria meningitidis serogroups in adolescents and young adults. FUNDING: GSK.

• MeSH
• Child MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Immunogenicity, Vaccine * MeSH
• Single-Blind Method MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Meningococcal Infections * prevention & control   immunology   MeSH
• Meningococcal Vaccines * immunology   adverse effects   administration & dosage   MeSH
• Adolescent MeSH
• Young Adult MeSH
• Neisseria meningitidis, Serogroup B immunology   MeSH
• Neisseria meningitidis immunology   MeSH
• Antibodies, Bacterial blood   MeSH
• Healthy Volunteers MeSH
• Check Tag
• Child MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Adolescent MeSH
• Young Adult MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Equivalence Trial MeSH
• Clinical Trial, Phase III MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe aortic stenosis present frequently (∼50%) with concomitant obstructive coronary artery disease. Current guidelines recommend combined surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) as the preferred treatment. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) represent a valid treatment alternative. We aimed to test the non-inferiority of FFR-guided PCI plus TAVI versus SAVR plus CABG in patients with severe aortic stenosis and complex coronary artery disease. METHODS: This international, multicentre, prospective, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial was conducted at 18 tertiary medical centres across Europe. Patients (aged ≥70 years) with severe aortic stenosis and complex coronary artery disease, deemed feasible for percutaneous or surgical treatment according to the on-site Heart Team, were randomly assigned (1:1) to FFR-guided PCI plus TAVI or SAVR plus CABG according to a computer-generated sequence with random permuted blocks sizes stratified by site. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, disabling stroke, clinically driven target-vessel revascularisation, valve reintervention, and life-threatening or disabling bleeding at 1 year post-treatment. The trial was powered for non-inferiority (with a margin of 15%) and if met, for superiority. The primary and safety analyses were done per an intention-to-treat principle. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03424941) and is closed. FINDINGS: Between May 31, 2018, and June 30, 2023, 172 patients were enrolled, of whom 91 were assigned to the FFR-guided PCI plus TAVI group and 81 to the SAVR plus CABG group. The mean age of patients was 76·5 years (SD 3·9). 118 (69%) of 172 patients were male and 54 (31%) patients were female. FFR-guided PCI plus TAVI resulted in favourable outcomes for the primary endpoint (four [4%] of 91 patients) versus SAVR plus CABG (17 [23%] of 77 patients; risk difference -18·5 [90% CI -27·8 to -9·7]), which was below the 15% prespecified non-inferiority margin (pnon-inferiority<0·001). FFR-guided PCI plus TAVI was superior to SAVR plus CABG (hazard ratio 0·17 [95% CI 0·06-0·51]; psuperiority<0·001), which was driven mainly by all-cause mortality (none [0%] of 91 patients vs seven (10%) of 77 patients; p=0·0025) and life-threatening bleeding (two [2%] vs nine [12%]; p=0·010). INTERPRETATION: The TCW trial is the first trial to compare percutaneous treatment versus surgical treatment in patients with severe aortic stenosis and complex coronary artery disease, showing favourable primary endpoint and mortality outcomes with percutaneous treatment. FUNDING: Isala Heart Centre and Medtronic.

• MeSH
• Aortic Valve Stenosis * surgery   complications   MeSH
• Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation methods   MeSH
• Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial * MeSH
• Percutaneous Coronary Intervention * methods   MeSH
• Coronary Artery Bypass * methods   MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Coronary Artery Disease * surgery   complications   therapy   MeSH
• Prospective Studies MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement * methods   MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Equivalence Trial MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH
• Comparative Study MeSH

INTRODUCTION: In a previously published randomised, placebo-controlled trial, 800 mg/day of pharmaceutical-grade chondroitin sulfate (CS) was shown to be superior to placebo in reducing pain and improving function over 6 months in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of the current post hoc analyses was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of CS compared with placebo in a European perspective using individual patient data from this clinical trial. METHODS: Patients with knee OA randomised to CS or placebo were followed up at 1, 3 and 6 months. The algo-functional Lequesne index was used to derive the EuroQol Five-Dimension Five-Level (EQ-5D-5L) score based on a validated formula. The EQ-5D-5L scores at each time point were used to calculate the changes in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) with the area under the curve method. Costs were assessed using the average price of CS in the countries where the original study took place and where CS is currently marketed. The costs of CS in three countries were then used (i.e. the Czech Republic, Italy and Switzerland). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) threshold for CS to be considered cost-effective was set at 91,870 EUR per QALY (equivalent to the usually recommended threshold of US $100,000). The study used an intention-to-treat population, i.e. patients who received one dose of the study drug, and imputed missing values using the basal observation carried forward method. RESULTS: No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed between the CS group (N = 199) and the placebo group (N = 205). The mean cost of CS for 6 months of treatment was 194.74 EUR. After 6 months of treatment, CS showed a mean ICER of 33,462 (95% CI 5130-61,794) EUR per QALY gained, indicating cost-effectiveness compared with placebo. The acceptability curve for cost-effectiveness shows that the CS treatment is likely to be cost-effective compared with placebo, with a 93% probability when the ceiling ratio is set at 91,870 EUR per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the role of CS as a cost-effective therapeutic option in the management of OA. However, further studies taking into account the use of other healthcare resources are warranted for a more complete understanding.

• MeSH
• Cost-Effectiveness Analysis MeSH
• Cost-Benefit Analysis * MeSH
• Osteoarthritis, Knee * drug therapy   economics   MeSH
• Chondroitin Sulfates * therapeutic use   economics   MeSH
• Quality-Adjusted Life Years * MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Check Tag
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH
• Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
• Geographicals
• Czech Republic MeSH
• Italy MeSH
• Switzerland MeSH

OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety and oncological advantages of en bloc resection of bladder tumour (ERBT) vs conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumour (cTURBT) in terms of resection quality, staging quality, and safety. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-blinded randomised controlled trial at seven European hospitals with the following inclusion criteria: first diagnosis of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, no singular carcinoma in situ, and tumour size >4.3 mm. Patients were randomised intraoperatively in a 1:1 ratio to either the ERBT or cTURBT group. Outcome analysis was performed using the chi-square test, t-test, and multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 97 patients were randomised into the study (cTURBT = 40, ERBT = 57). A switch to cTURBT was necessary in two patients (3.5%) and 11.5% of the screened patients were preoperatively excluded for ERBT. There was no difference in the specimen presence of detrusor muscle with 73.7% in cTURBT and 67.3% in ERBT specimens (P = 0.69). There were no significant differences in mean operative time (ERBT 27.6 vs cTURBT 25.4 min, P = 0.450) or mean resection time (ERBT 16.3 vs cTURBT 15.5 min, P = 0.732). Overall the complication rate did not differ significantly (ERBT 18.2% vs cTURBT 7.5%, P = 0.142). Bladder perforations occurred significantly more often in the ERBT group (ERBT seven vs cTURBT none, P = 0.020). R0 status was reported more often after ERBT, whilst a second resection was significantly less frequent after ERBT (P = 0.018). Recurrence rates were comparable for both techniques after 6 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: The feasibility of ERBT is higher than previously reported. Whereas other perioperative and safety parameters are comparable to cTURBT, bladder perforations occurred significantly more often in the ERBT group and raised safety concerns. This is why this trial was terminated.

• MeSH
• Cystectomy * methods   adverse effects   MeSH
• Single-Blind Method MeSH
• Carcinoma, Transitional Cell surgery   pathology   MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms * surgery   pathology   MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Transurethral Resection of Bladder MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH
• Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
• Comparative Study MeSH

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: While prostate cancer (PCa) incidence and mortality rates continue to rise, early detection of PCa remains highly controversial, and the research landscape is rapidly evolving. Existing systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) provide valuable insights, but often focus on single aspects of early detection, hindering a comprehensive understanding of the topic. We aim to fill this gap by providing a comprehensive SR of contemporary SRs covering different aspects of early detection of PCa in the European Union (EU) and the UK. METHODS: On June 1, 2023, we searched four databases (Medline ALL via Ovid, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and Google Scholar. To avoid repetition of previous studies, only SRs (qualitative, quantitative, and/or MAs) were considered eligible. In the data, common themes were identified to present the evidence systematically. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: We identified 1358 citations, resulting in 26 SRs eligible for inclusion. Six themes were identified: (1) invitation: men at general risk should be invited at >50 yr of age, and testing should be discontinued at >70 yr or with <10 yr of life expectancy; (2) decision-making: most health authorities discourage population-based screening and instead recommend a shared decision-making (SDM) approach, but implementation of SDM in clinical practice varies widely; decision aids help men make more informed and value-consistent screening decisions and decrease men's intention to attempt screening, but these do not affect screening uptake; (3) acceptance: facilitators for men considering screening include social prompting by partners and clinician recommendations, while barriers include a lack of knowledge, low-risk perception, and masculinity attributes; (4) screening test and algorithm: prostate-specific antigen-based screening reduces PCa-specific mortality and metastatic disease in men aged 55-69 yr at randomisation if screened at least twice; (5) harms and benefits: these benefits come at the cost of unnecessary biopsies, overdiagnosis, and subsequent overtreatment; and (6) future of screening: risk-adapted screening including (prebiopsy) risk calculators, magnetic resonance imaging, and blood- and urine-based biomarkers could reduce these harms. To enable a comprehensive overview, we focused on SRs. These do not include the most recent prospective studies, which were therefore incorporated in the discussion. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: By identifying consistent and conflicting evidence, this review highlights the evidence-based foundations that can be built upon, as well as areas requiring further research and improvement to reduce the burden of PCa in the EU and UK. PATIENT SUMMARY: This review of 26 reviews covers various aspects of prostate cancer screening such as invitation, decision-making, screening tests, harms, and benefits. This review provides insights into existing evidence, highlighting the areas of consensus and discrepancies, to guide future research and improve prostate cancer screening strategies in Europe.

• MeSH
• Early Detection of Cancer * MeSH
• European Union * MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Prostatic Neoplasms * diagnosis   MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Review MeSH
• Geographicals
• United Kingdom MeSH

BACKGROUND: Preservation of mobility independence is a primary goal in older adults with physical frailty and sarcopenia (PF&S). Interventions based on the combination of physical activity (PA) and nutritional counselling have been indicated as strategies for the management of this condition, although their effectiveness is not confirmed in all investigations. A possible explanation for this uncertain scenario relies in the impact of the adherence to PA interventions. Hence, the present study investigated the impact of the adherence to PA sessions on the incidence of mobility disability in older adults with PF&S. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of an evaluator blinded, randomised controlled trial, developed in 16 clinical sites across 11 European countries, from January 2016 to 31 October 2019. Participants were community-dwelling older adults (70+ years) with PF&S enrolled in the SPRINTT trial (NCT02582138). PF&S was operationalised as having a total score from 3 to 9 on the short physical performance battery (SPPB), low appendicular lean mass and ability to complete the 400-m walk test in < 15 min. Data from participants allocated to a multicomponent intervention (PA with technological support plus nutritional counselling) and a healthy ageing lifestyle education programme (control group) were analysed. Adherence to PA was assessed based on the number of weekly sessions attended. According to recommendations of the American College of Sports Medicine, adherence was categorised as below recommendations (< 2 sessions/week, BR), meeting recommendations (2-3 sessions/week, MR), and above recommendations (> 3 sessions/week, AR). The primary outcome was incident mobility disability, operationalised as incident inability to complete the 400-m walk test in < 15 min during up to 36 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Data of 1444 participants (mean age 79.3 years, 72.6% women) were analysed. In those with SPPB scores of 3-7, MR and AR groups had lower risk of mobility disability compared with controls [MR HR (95% CI): 0.57 (0.41-0.78), p = 0.001; AR HR (95% CI): 0.33 (0.23-0.46), p < 0.001] and BR groups [MR: HR (95% CI): 0.48 (0.34-0.69), p < 0.001; AR: HR (95% CI): 0.27 (0.18-0.38), p < 0.001] in a dose-dependent manner. In those with SPPB scores of 8 or 9, the BR group had a higher risk of mobility disability than controls. MR and AR groups had a lower risk of mobility disability than the BR group. CONCLUSIONS: In older adults with PF&S, adherence to PA recommendations is associated with lower incidence of mobility disability. This benefit depends on the degree of adherence as well as baseline physical performance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02582138.

• MeSH
• Exercise * physiology   MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Mobility Limitation * MeSH
• Persons with Disabilities MeSH
• Sarcopenia * physiopathology   therapy   MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH
• Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH

BACKGROUND: Mirvetuximab soravtansine-gynx (MIRV) is a first-in-class antibody-drug conjugate targeting folate receptor α (FRα), approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer in the USA. Here, we report patient-reported outcomes for participants treated with MIRV compared with investigator's choice of chemotherapy from the phase 3 MIRASOL trial, which met its primary endpoint of progression-free survival and key secondary endpoints of objective response rate and overall survival. METHODS: The MIRASOL trial was a confirmatory, phase 3, randomised, controlled, open-label trial, building on the phase 2 SORAYA trial which had previously demonstrated the safety and efficacy of MIRV in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Patients 18 years or older with a confirmed platinum-resistant, recurrent high-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosis were recruited from 253 sites including hospitals, academic centres, and community centres in 21 countries. Patients must have received one to three previous systemic anticancer therapies, and have high FRα tumour expression (≥75% tumour cells with an immunohistochemistry score of ≥2+ membrane staining using the PS2+ scoring method), one or more lesions with measurable disease, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to MIRV or investigator's choice of chemotherapy, stratified by number of previous therapy lines and the type of investigator's choice of chemotherapy. Therapies were administered in an open-label manner; MIRV was administered intravenously at 6 mg/kg of adjusted ideal bodyweight every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Key secondary endpoints were objective response rate, overall survival, and a 15·0-point or greater improvement at week 8 or 9 in abdominal and gastrointestinal symptoms using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Ovarian Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-OV28) in the intention-to-treat population. The MIRASOL trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04209855), the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG 3045), and the European Network of Gynaecological Oncological Trial Groups (ENGOT-ov55), and is complete. FINDINGS: Between Feb 3, 2020, and Aug 3, 2022, 453 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to treatment (227 to the MIRV group and 226 to the investigator's choice of chemotherapy group). All patients were female; 301 (66%) participants were White, 53 (12%) were Asian, 13 (3%) were Black, and 86 (19%) were of another race or not reported; 27 (6%) were Hispanic or Latino. The median follow-up for the study, determined by the reverse Kaplan-Meier method, was 13·1 months (95% CI 12·1-14). QLQ-OV28 completion rates were 86% (365 of 425) at baseline and 81% (282 of 349) at week 8 or 9. 34 (21·0%; 95% CI 15·0-28·1) of 162 patients treated with MIRV reported improvement in QLQ-OV28 abdominal and gastrointestinal scores, compared with 23 (15·3%; 10·0-22·1) of 150 patients treated with the investigator's choice of chemotherapy. These differences were not statistically significant (odds ratio 1·5 [95% CI 0·8-2·6]; p=0·26). INTERPRETATION: MIRV did not seem to impair or improve patient quality of life compared with investigator's choice of chemotherapy. The similar quality-of-life outcomes in the two treatment groups, combined with the previously reported higher efficacy of MIRV compared with single-agent chemotherapy, support MIRV as new treatment option for FRα-positive platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. FUNDING: AbbVie.

• MeSH
• Drug Resistance, Neoplasm * drug effects   MeSH
• Progression-Free Survival MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial * drug therapy   mortality   pathology   MeSH
• Folate Receptor 1 * metabolism   antagonists & inhibitors   MeSH
• Patient Reported Outcome Measures * MeSH
• Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized * therapeutic use   adverse effects   MeSH
• Immunoconjugates * therapeutic use   adverse effects   MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Maytansine * analogs & derivatives   therapeutic use   adverse effects   administration & dosage   MeSH
• Ovarian Neoplasms * drug therapy   pathology   mortality   metabolism   MeSH
• Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols * therapeutic use   adverse effects   MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Check Tag
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Clinical Trial, Phase III MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH
• Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
• Comparative Study MeSH

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Despite strong evidence for improved preservation of donor livers by machine perfusion, longer post-transplant follow-up data are urgently needed in an unselected patient population. We aimed to assess long-term outcomes after transplantation of hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE)-treated donor livers based on real-world data (i.e., IDEAL-D stage 4). METHODS: In this international, multicentre, observational cohort study, we collected data from adult recipients of HOPE-treated livers transplanted between January 2012 and December 2021. Analyses were stratified by donation after brain death (DBD) and donation after circulatory death (DCD), sub-divided by their respective risk categories. The primary outcome was death-censored graft survival. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of primary non-function (PNF) and ischaemic cholangiopathy (IC). RESULTS: We report on 1,202 liver transplantations (64% DBD) performed at 22 European centres. For DBD, a total number of 99 benchmark (8%), 176 standard (15%), and 493 extended-criteria (41%) cases were included. For DCD, 117 transplants were classified as low risk (10%), 186 as high risk (16%), and 131 as futile (11%), with significant risk profile variations among centres. Actuarial 1-, 3-, and 5-year death-censored graft survival rates for DBD and DCD livers were 95%, 92%, and 91%, vs. 92%, 87%, and 81%, respectively (log-rank p = 0.003). Within DBD and DCD strata, death-censored graft survival was similar among risk groups (log-rank p = 0.26, p = 0.99). Graft loss due to PNF or IC was 2.3% and 0.4% (DBD), and 5% and 4.1% (DCD). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows excellent 5-year survival after transplantation of HOPE-treated DBD and DCD livers with low rates of graft loss due to PNF or IC, irrespective of their individual risk profile. HOPE treatment has now reached IDEAL-D stage 4, which further supports its implementation in routine clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05520320. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: This study demonstrates the excellent long-term performance of hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) treatment of donation after circulatory and donation after brain death liver grafts irrespective of their individual risk profile in a real-world setting, outside the evaluation of randomised-controlled trials. While previous studies have established safety, feasibility, and efficacy against the current standard, according to the IDEAL-D evaluation framework, HOPE treatment has now reached the final IDEAL-D stage 4, which further supports its implementation in routine clinical practice.

• MeSH
• Tissue Donors statistics & numerical data   MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Cohort Studies MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Perfusion * methods   instrumentation   MeSH
• Graft Survival * MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Hypothermia, Induced methods   MeSH
• Liver Transplantation * methods   adverse effects   MeSH
• Organ Preservation * methods   MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH
• Observational Study MeSH

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes and prediabetes represent significant global health challenges, with physical activity (PA) being essential for disease management and prevention. Despite the well-documented benefits, many individuals with (pre)diabetes remain insufficiently active. General practitioners (GP) provide an accessible platform for delivering interventions; however, integrating PA interventions into routine care is hindered by resource constraints. OBJECTIVES: The ENERGISED trial aims to address these barriers through an innovative GP-initiated mHealth intervention combining wearable technology and just-in-time adaptive interventions. METHODS: The ENERGISED trial is a pragmatic, 12-month, multicentre, randomised controlled trial, assessing a GP-initiated mHealth intervention to increase PA and reduce sedentary behaviour in patients with type 2 diabetes and prediabetes. The primary outcome is daily step count, assessed via wrist-worn accelerometry. The primary analysis follows the intention-to-treat principle, using mixed models for repeated measures. Missing data will be handled under the missing-at-random assumption, with sensitivity analyses exploring robustness through reference-based multiple imputation. The trial incorporates the estimand framework to provide transparent and structured treatment effect estimation. DISCUSSION: This statistical analysis plan outlines a robust approach to addressing participant non-adherence, protocol violations, and missing data. By adopting the estimand framework and pre-specified sensitivity analyses, the plan ensures methodological rigour while enhancing the interpretability and applicability of results. CONCLUSIONS: The ENERGISED trial leverages innovative mHealth strategies within primary care to promote PA in individuals with (pre)diabetes. The pre-specified statistical framework provides a comprehensive guide for analysing trial data and contributes to advancing best practices in behavioural intervention trials for public health. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05351359 . Registered on April 28, 2022.

• MeSH
• Accelerometry MeSH
• Exercise * MeSH
• Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 * therapy   psychology   diagnosis   MeSH
• Fitness Trackers MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Multicenter Studies as Topic MeSH
• Wearable Electronic Devices MeSH
• Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic MeSH
• General Practice * methods   MeSH
• Prediabetic State * therapy   psychology   diagnosis   MeSH
• Sedentary Behavior * MeSH
• Telemedicine * statistics & numerical data   MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Clinical Trial Protocol MeSH

Monotherapy with a potent P2Y12 receptor antagonist after 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) may reduce bleeding in the absence of increased ischaemic events compared to 12-month DAPT in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). PCI guidance with optical coherence tomography (OCT) may enhance stent expansion. COMPARE STEMI ONE is an international, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. In 1,656 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, prasugrel monotherapy after 1 month of DAPT, as compared to standard 12-month prasugrel-based DAPT, will be tested for non-inferiority for the primary composite endpoint of net adverse clinical events - defined as all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or Bleeding Academic Research Consortium Type 3 or 5 bleeding events - at 11 months after randomisation. Furthermore, an ancillary substudy will test the superiority of OCT-guided versus angiography-guided staged complete revascularisation in achieving a larger minimal stent area (MSA) in non-culprit lesions during staged procedures. COMPARE STEMI ONE is the first randomised controlled trial assessing an abbreviated 1-month DAPT regimen followed by prasugrel monotherapy in the context of STEMI. The trial will also study the value of OCT-guided PCI in terms of the MSA of non-culprit lesions and may elucidate potential synergies between intravascular imaging-guided PCI and abbreviated DAPT regimens. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05491200).

• MeSH
• Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists * therapeutic use   MeSH
• ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction * therapy   drug therapy   diagnostic imaging   surgery   MeSH
• Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors * therapeutic use   MeSH
• Coronary Angiography methods   MeSH
• Percutaneous Coronary Intervention * methods   MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Tomography, Optical Coherence * methods   MeSH
• Prasugrel Hydrochloride * therapeutic use   MeSH
• Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH
• Clinical Trial Protocol MeSH
• Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
• Comparative Study MeSH