BACKGROUND: Germline genetic susceptibilities of rare cancers of the esophagus, stomach, small intestine, testis, (nonmedullary) thyroid gland and bone with high familial risks are not well known. Here, we use familial risk data from the Swedish Family-Cancer Database which contains records of cancers in Swedish families obtained over a century. We compare familial risks for offspring diagnosed with any of these cancers when their parent had or had not that cancer. We review the global literature of the reported constitutional variants that may explain part of the familial risk. MAIN BODY: Familial risks for esophageal and stomach cancers are about 2.0 and apart from early-onset stomach cancer few high-risk variants are known. Genetic studies may be hampered by dominant environmental risk factors for these cancers. Small intestinal carcinoids have a very high familial risk (28 between siblings) but no high-risk genes have been identified to explain this. Low-risk polygenic variants have been identified. Small intestinal adenocarcinoma is a manifestation in Lynch syndrome. Testicular and thyroid cancers are characterized by high familial risk (about 5) which may be explained largely by a polygenic background, although thyroid cancer is a component in a number of rare cancer syndromes. Several predisposing genes have been identified for bone cancer (familial risk 7). CONCLUSIONS: The discussed cancers are rare and they present with a relatively high familial risk, in spite of lacking identified high-penetrant constitutional variants. It is possible that the polygenic component, already recognized for testis cancer, is stronger than previously expected. Thus polygenic models with rare high/moderate- and low-risk variants could fit the familial risk and shape the germline genetic landscape of these cancers. Polygenic background may have clinical implications.
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
BACKGROUND: The Swedish Family-Cancer Database (FCD) is the largest source of data on familial cancer in the world, including practically complete family structures and individual cancer diagnoses from the high-quality cancer registry. We present a novel application of FCD by analyzing age-specific familial risks and interpreting them through likely causes, such as germline pathogenic variants and/or environmental exposures. MAIN BODY: The basic assumption for this approach is that a discrete familial clustering in a narrow age-interval is not random but may provide causal clues. For this analysis we selected reasonably common cancers to meaningfully scrutinize familial risk through adulthood in which cancers are diagnosed, that included colorectal (CRC) and endometrial cancers, prostate and kidney cancers and breast and lung cancers. The interpretation is based on the literature. The highest familial relative risks for CRC and endometrial cancers were found at ages 40-44 years, matching the peak impact of mismatch repair gene mutations. However endometrial cancer showed also a small early onset component which could not be explained. Age-related familial risks for breast, prostate and kidney cancers also matched data from large-scale sequencing; these included the early onset component in kidney cancer which was likely due to VHL mutations. Age distribution of familial lung cancer was unique in showing a wide peak extending from middle to old ages, which would be consistent with a combination of direct genetic effects and indirect influence on inheritance of smoking dependence. CONCLUSIONS: The present review of age-specific familial risks and age-of-onset data from the literature may allow an interpretation that the familial and germline landscapes are reasonably harmonious for relatively early onset cancers but at higher ages no discrete peaks can be found which may implicate attenuated impact of high-risk genes and polygenic influence.
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
Esophageal cancer (EC) and gastric cancer (GC) are fatal cancers with a relatively late age of onset. Age is a negative risk factor for survival in many cancers and our aim was to analyze age-specific survival in EC and GC using the recently updated NORDCAN database. NORDCAN data originate from the Danish, Finnish, Norwegian, and Swedish nationwide cancer registries covering years 1972 through 2021 inviting for comparison of 50-year survival trends between the countries. Relative 1- and 5-year survival and 5/1-year conditional survival (i.e., survival in those who were alive in Year 1 to survive additional 4 years) were analyzed. Survival in EC showed large gains for patients below age 80 years, 5-year survival in Norwegian men reaching 30% and in women over 30% but for 80-89 year old survival remained at 10%. In contrast, hardly any gain was seen among the 80-89 year patients for 1-year survival and small gains in 5 year and 5/1-year survival. Survival gaps between age-groups increased over time. For GC there was also a clear age-related negative survival gradient but the survival gaps between the age groups did not widen over time; Norwegian male and female 5-year survival for 80-89 year old was about 20%. The age-specific survival difference in GC arose in Year 1 and did not essentially increase in 5-year survival. While there were differences in survival improvements between the countries, poor survival of the 80-89 year old patients was shared by all of them. To conclude, survival has improved steadily in younger GC and EC patients in most Nordic countries. While the 80-89 year old population accounts for nearly a quarter of all patients and their poor survival depressed overall survival, which can therefore be increased further by improving diagnostics, treatment and care of elderly EC and GC patients.
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- míra přežití MeSH
- nádory jícnu * mortalita epidemiologie MeSH
- nádory žaludku * mortalita epidemiologie MeSH
- registrace * MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- věkové faktory MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Skandinávie a severské státy MeSH
UNLABELLED: Early recognition of hereditary urological cancers may influence diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making, and potentially alter the fate of patients and family members. Here, we introduce readers to the current knowledge on germline genetic testing and clinical practice in prostate, bladder, renal, and testicular carcinoma. Considering all urological cancer patients, routine inquiries about familial cancer history should become a standard practice in clinical settings. If suspicion arises, patients can opt for two avenues: referral to genetic counseling or undergoing genetic tests after consultation with the treating urologist. PATIENT SUMMARY: Tumors of the urogenital tract (prostate, kidney, bladder, and testes) can sometimes be related to genetic mutations that are present in all the cells of the body. Such mutations can be inherited and run in families. Therefore, it is relevant to obtain information on the incidence of all cancers in the family history. The information obtained may initiate genetic testing, leading to the identification of mutations that are related to cancer in the current or next generation. In addition, these mutations may offer alternative treatment options for patients.
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKROUND: We wanted to characterize conditional survival in prostate cancer (PC) in Sweden around and after 2005 when the vast increase in incidence due to the opportunistic testing for prostate specific antigen (PSA) culminated. We hypothesize that analyzing survival data during that time period may help interpret survival trends. We focus on stage-specific analysis using conditional survival in order to define the periods when deaths most commonly occurred. METHODS: Data on PC patients were obtained from the Swedish cancer registry for analysis of 1-, 2.5- and 5-year relative survival and conditional relative survival between years 2004 and 2018. Tumor-node-metastatic stage classification at diagnosis was used to specify survival. RESULTS: Small improvements were observed in stage- and age-related relative survival duriring the study period. Applying conditional relative survival showed that survival in stage T3 up to 2.5 years was better than survival between years 2.5 and 5. Survival in stage T4 was approximately equal in the first and the subsequent 2.5-year period. For M1, the first 2.5 year survival period was worse than the subsequent one. The proportion of high risk and M1 disease in old patients (80+ years) remained very high and their survival improved only modestly. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate that M1 metastases kill more patients in the first 2.5 years than between years 2.5 and 5 after diagnosis; T4 deaths are equal in the two periods, and in T3 mortality in the first 2.5-year period is lower than between years 2.5 and 5 after diagnosis. Conditional survival could be applied to explore critical survival periods even past 5 years after diagnoses and to monitor success in novel diagnostic and treatment practices. Improvement of survival in elderly patients may require clinical input.
- MeSH
- analýza přežití MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- míra přežití MeSH
- nádory prostaty * MeSH
- prostatický specifický antigen MeSH
- registrace MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- staging nádorů MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Švédsko MeSH
BACKGROUND: Cancers of the head and neck (HN) are heterogeneous tumors with incidence rates varying globally. In Northern Europe oral and oropharyngeal cancers are the most common individual types. Survival for HN varies by individual tumor type but for most of them survival trends are not well known over extended periods of time. METHODS: Data for a retrospective survival study were obtained for Danish, Finnish, Norwegian, and Swedish patients from the NORDCAN database from 1971 to 2020. Relative 1- and 5-year survival rates and 5/1-year conditional survival for years 2-5 were calculated. RESULTS: Both 1- and 5-year survival improved for all HN cancers but only marginally for laryngeal cancer. For the other cancers a 50-year increase in 5-year survival was about 30% units for nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal cancers, 20% units for oral cancer and somewhat less for hypopharyngeal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: 5-year survival reached about 65% for all HN cancers, except for hypopharyngeal cancer (30%). Human papilloma virus infection is becoming a dominant risk factor for the rapidly increasing oropharyngeal cancer, the prevention of which needs to emphasize oral sex as a route of infection.
- MeSH
- incidence MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- míra přežití MeSH
- nádory hltanu * mortalita epidemiologie MeSH
- nádory hrtanu * mortalita epidemiologie MeSH
- nádory úst mortalita epidemiologie MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Skandinávie a severské státy MeSH
OBJECTIVES: We analyze survival in thyroid cancer from Denmark (DK), Finland (FI), Norway (NO), and Sweden (SE) over a 50-year period (1971-2020), and additionally consider concomitant changes in incidence and mortality. DESIGN: Population-based survival study. METHODS: Relative 1-, 5/1 (conditional)-, and 5-year survival data were obtained from the NORDCAN database for years 1971-2020. Incidence and mortality rates were also assessed. RESULTS: A novel consistent observation was that 1-year survival was worse than 5/1-year survival but the difference between these decreased with time. Relative 1-year survival in thyroid cancer (mean for the 4 countries) reached 92.7% for men and 95.6% for women; 5-year survival reached 88.0% for men and 93.7% for women. Survival increased most for DK which started at a low level and reached the best survival at the end. Male and female incidence rates for thyroid cancer increased 3- and 4-fold, respectively. In the same time, mortality halved for men and for women, it decreased by 2/3. CONCLUSIONS: We documented worse relative survival in the first year than in the 4 subsequent years, most likely because of rare anaplastic cancer. Overall survival in thyroid cancer patients increased in the Nordic countries in the course of 50 years; 5-year survival was close to 90% for men and close to 95% for women. Even though overdiagnosis may explain some of 5-year survival increase, it is unlikely to influence the substantial increase in 1-year survival. The unmet need is to increase 1-year survival by diagnosing and treating aggressive tumors before metastatic spread.
- MeSH
- databáze faktografické MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory štítné žlázy * diagnóza epidemiologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Finsko MeSH
- Norsko MeSH
PURPOSE: Sarcomas are rare cancers with many subtypes in soft tissues, bone and cartilage. International survival trends in these cancers are not well known. We present 50-year survival trends for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and bone sarcoma (BS) in Denmark (DK), Finland (FI), Norway (NO) and Sweden (SE). METHODS: Relative 1-, 5/1 conditional- and 5-year survival data were obtained from the NORDCAN database for years 1971-20. We additionally estimated annual changes in survival rates and determined significant break points. RESULTS: In the last period, 2016-20, 5-year survival in STS was best for NO men (74.6%) and FI women (71.1%). For the rarer BS, survival rates for SE men (72.0%) and DK women (71.1%) were best. Survival in BS was lower than that in STS in 1971-75 and the difference remained in 2016-20 for men, but for women the rates were almost equal. Sex- and country-specific differences in survival in STS were small. The 50-year improvement in 5-year survival in STS was highest in NO men, 34.0 % units and FI women, 30.0 % units. The highest improvements in BS were in SE men 26.2 % units and in FI women 29.2 % units. CONCLUSIONS: The steady development in survival over the half century suggests contribution by stepwise improvements in diagnostics, treatment and care. The 10-15% mortality in the first year probably indicates diagnostic delays which could be improved by organizing patient pathways for aggressive rare diseases. Early diagnosis would also reduce metastatic disease and breakthroughs in treatment are a current challenge.
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- míra přežití MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- nádory kostí * mortalita epidemiologie patologie MeSH
- nádory měkkých tkání mortalita epidemiologie patologie MeSH
- osteosarkom mortalita epidemiologie patologie terapie MeSH
- registrace MeSH
- sarkom * mortalita epidemiologie patologie terapie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Finsko MeSH
- Skandinávie a severské státy MeSH
Survival studies are important tools for cancer control, but long-term survival data on high-quality cancer registries are lacking for all cancers, including prostate (PC), testicular (TC), and penile cancers. Using generalized additive models and data from the NORDCAN database, we analyzed 1- and 5-year relative survival for these cancers in Denmark (DK), Finland (FI), Norway (NO), and Sweden (SE) over a 50-year period (1971-2020). We additionally estimated conditional 5/1-year survival for patients who survived the 1st year after diagnosis. Survival improved early for TC, and 5-year survival reached 90% between 1985 (SE) and 2000 (FI). Towards the end of the follow-up, the TC patients who had survived the 1st year survived the next 4 years with comparable probability to the background population. For PC, the 90% landmark was reached between 2000 (FI) and after 2010 (DK). For penile cancer, 5-year survival never reached the 90% landmark, and the improvements in survival were modest at best. For TC, early mortality requires attention, whereas late mortality should be tackled for PC. For penile cancer, the relatively high early mortality may suggest delays in diagnosis and would require more public awareness and encouragement of patients to seek medical opinion. In FI, TC and penile cancer patients showed roughly double risk of dying compared to the other Nordic countries, which warrants further study and clinical attention.
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: The incidence of prostate cancer (PC) increased vastly as a result of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing. Survival in PC improved in the PSA-testing era, but changes in clinical presentation have hampered the interpretation of the underlying causes. DESIGN: We analyzed survival trends in PC using data from the NORDCAN database for Denmark (DK), Finland (FI), Norway (NO) and Sweden (SE) by analyzing 1-, 5- and 10-year relative survival and conditional relative survival over the course of 50 years (1971-2020). RESULTS: In the pre-PSA era, survival improved in FI and SE and improved marginally in NO but not in DK. PSA testing began toward the end of the 1980s; 5-year survival increased by approximately 30%, and 10-year survival improved even more. Conditional survival from years 6 to 10 (5 years) was better than conditional survival from years 2 to 5 (4 years), but by 2010, this difference disappeared in countries other than DK. Survival in the first year after diagnosis approached 100%; by year 5, it was 95%; and by year 10, it was 90% in the best countries, NO and SE. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of advances in diagnostics and treatment, further attention is required to improve PC survival.
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
