OBJECTIVE: To determine the oncological impact of extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) vs standard PLND (sPLND) during radical cystectomy (RC) in clinically lymph node-positive (cN+) bladder cancer (BCa). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, multicentre study we included 969 patients who underwent RC with sPLND (internal/external iliac and obturator lymph nodes) or ePLND (sPLND plus common iliac and presacral nodes) with or without platin-based peri-operative chemotherapy for cTany N1-3 M0 BCa between 1991 and 2022. We assessed the impact of ePLND on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and the distribution of recurrences (locoregional and distant recurrences). The secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). We performed propensity-score matching using covariates associated with the extent of PLND in univariable logistic regression analysis. The association of the extent of PLND with RFS and OS was investigated using Cox regression models. RESULTS: Of 969 cN+ patients, 510 were 1:1 matched on propensity scores. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) time to recurrence was 8 (4-16) months, and median (IQR) follow-up of alive patients was 30 (13-51) months. Disease recurrence was observed in 104 patients in the ePLND and 107 in the sPLND group. Of these, 136 (27%), 47 (9.2%) and 19 patients (3.7%) experienced distant, locoregional, or both distant and locoregional disease recurrence, respectively. When stratified by the extent of PLND, we did not find a difference in recurrence patterns (P > 0.05). ePLND improved neither RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-1.19; P = 0.5) nor OS (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.60-1.01; P = 0.06) compared to sPLND. Stratification by induction chemotherapy did not change outcomes. CONCLUSION: Performing an ePLND at the time of RC in cN+ patients improved neither RFS nor OS compared to sPLND, regardless of induction chemotherapy status. Pretreatment risk stratification is paramount to identify ideal candidates for RC with ePLND as part of a multimodal treatment approach.
- MeSH
- cystektomie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lokální recidiva nádoru * patologie MeSH
- lymfadenektomie MeSH
- lymfatické uzliny chirurgie patologie MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře * farmakoterapie chirurgie MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There has been a recent surge in the development of agents for bacillus Calmette-Guérin-unresponsive (BCG-U) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Critical assessment of these agents and practical recommendations for optimal selection of patients and therapies are urgently needed, especially in the absence of randomized trials on bladder-sparing treatment (BST) options. METHODS: A global committee of bladder cancer experts was assembled to develop recommendations on BST for BCG-U NMIBC. Working groups reviewed the literature and developed draft recommendations, which were then voted on by International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG) members using a modified Delphi process. During a live meeting in August 2023, voting results and supporting evidence were presented, and recommendations were refined on the basis of meeting discussions. Final recommendations achieved >75% agreement during the meeting, and some were further refined via web conferences and e-mail discussions. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: There is currently no single optimal agent for patients with BCG-U disease who seek to avoid radical cystectomy (RC). BST selection should be personalized, taking into account individual patient characteristics and preferences, tumor attributes, and efficacy/toxicity data for the agents available. For patients with BCG-U carcinoma in situ (CIS), gemcitabine/docetaxel (GEM/DOCE), nadofaragene firadenovec (NFF), and nogapendekin alfa inbakicept-pmln (NAI) + BCG are recommended; because of its systemic toxicity, pembrolizumab should only be offered after other options are exhausted. For patients with BCG-U papillary-only tumors, GEM/DOCE, NFF, NAI + BCG, single-agent chemotherapy, hyperthermic mitomycin C, and pembrolizumab are recommended. Given the modest efficacy of available options, clinical trial participation is encouraged. For unapproved agents with reported data, IBCG recommendations await the final results of pivotal trials. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The IBCG consensus recommendations provide practical guidance on BST for BCG-U NMIBC.
- MeSH
- adjuvancia imunologická terapeutické užití MeSH
- BCG vakcína * terapeutické užití MeSH
- cystektomie MeSH
- invazivní růst nádoru * MeSH
- léčba šetřící orgány * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře neinvadující svalovinu MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře * farmakoterapie patologie MeSH
- výběr pacientů * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
- směrnice pro lékařskou praxi MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the optimal number of induction chemotherapy cycles needed to achieve a pathological response in patients with clinically lymph node-positive (cN+) bladder cancer (BCa) who received three or four cycles of induction chemotherapy followed by consolidative radical cystectomy (RC) with pelvic lymph node dissection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 388 patients who received three or four cycles of cisplatin/gemcitabine or (dose-dense) methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC), followed by consolidative RC for cTanyN1-3M0 BCa. We compared pathological complete (pCR = ypT0N0) and objective response (pOR = yp ≤T1N0) between treatment groups. Predictors of pCR and/or pOR were assessed using uni- and multivariable logistic regression analysis. The secondary endpoints were overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). We evaluated the association between the number of induction chemotherapy cycles administered and survival outcomes on multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: Overall, 101 and 287 patients received three or four cycles of induction chemotherapy, respectively. Of these, 72 (19%) and 128 (33%) achieved pCR and pOR response, respectively. The pCR (20%, 18%) and pOR (40%, 31%) rates did not differ significantly between patients receiving three or four cycles (P > 0.05). The number of cycles was not associated with pCR or pOR on multivariable logistic regression analyses. The 2-year OS estimates were 63% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.74) and 63% (95% CI 0.58-0.7) for patients receiving three or four cycles, respectively. Receiving three vs four cycles was not associated with OS and CSS on uni- or multivariable Cox regression analyses. CONCLUSION: Pathological response and survival outcomes did not differ between administering three or four induction chemotherapy cycles in patients with cN+ BCa. A fewer cycles (minimum three) may be oncologically sufficient in patients with cN+ BCa, while decreasing the wait for definitive local therapy in those patients who end up without a response to chemotherapy. This warrants further validation.
- MeSH
- cisplatina aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- cystektomie * metody MeSH
- deoxycytidin analogy a deriváty aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- gemcitabin MeSH
- indukční chemoterapie * MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lymfadenektomie MeSH
- lymfatické metastázy * MeSH
- lymfatické uzliny patologie MeSH
- methotrexát aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře * farmakoterapie patologie mortalita MeSH
- protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie * terapeutické užití MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
PURPOSE: There is a significant unmet need for new and efficacious therapies in urothelial cancer (UC). To provide recommendations on appropriate clinical trial designs across disease settings in UC, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) and the International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG) convened a multidisciplinary, international consensus panel. METHODS: Through open communication and scientific debate in small- and whole-group settings, surveying, and responses to clinical questionnaires, the consensus panel developed recommendations on optimal definitions of the disease state, end points, trial design, evaluations, sample size calculations, and pathology considerations for definitive studies in low- and intermediate-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), high-risk NMIBC, muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, and metastatic UC. The expert panel also solicited input on the recommendations through presentations and public discussion during an open session at the 2021 Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network (BCAN) Think Tank (held virtually). RESULTS: The consensus panel developed a set of stage-specific bladder cancer clinical trial design recommendations, which are summarized in the table that accompanies this text. CONCLUSION: These recommendations developed by the SITC-IBCG Bladder Cancer Clinical Trial Design consensus panel will encourage uniformity among studies and facilitate drug development in this disease.
CONTEXT: Intermediate-risk (IR) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is a heterogeneous disease. OBJECTIVE: To update the International Bladder Cancer Group (IBCG) guidance and provide practical recommendations on IR NMIBC management. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A collaborative review of published randomized clinical trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and clinical practice guidance on IR NMIBC published before January 2022 was undertaken using PubMed/Medline. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Variation exists between guidelines in defining IR NMIBC. The IBCG recommends defining IR NMIBC as any TaLG tumor that is either recurrent or multifocal or has size ≥3 cm, OR any T1LG tumor. If the 3 tier grading system is used, than any TaG2 tumor would also be considered IR diease regardless of whether new diagnosis or recurrent. Accurate grading and staging of tumor, particularly in ruling out HG/G3 disease and/or carcinoma in situ, are crucial. The IBCG recommends that management of IR NMIBC should be further based on the following risk factors: multifocal tumor (more than one), early recurrence (<1 yr), frequent recurrence (>1/yr), tumor size (≥3 cm), and failure of prior intravesical treatment. Patients with no risk factors are best managed by one dose of postoperative intravesical chemotherapy. Patients with one to two risk factors should be offered additional adjuvant induction intravesical chemotherapy (or bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) if prior chemotherapy has been used). Patients with three or more risk factors should be offered induction plus 1-yr maintenance BCG. Where BCG is not available or recurrent disease following BCG is present, alternative intravesical treatments such as chemotherapy (single agent, combination, or chemohyperthermia) or a clinical trial are recommended. CONCLUSIONS: Standardizing the definition of IR NMIBC is critical for appropriate management of patients and for allowing a comparison of outcomes across clinical trials. The IBCG recommends defining IR NMIBC as any TaLG tumor that is either recurrent or multifocal or ≥3 cm, OR any T1LG tumor. If the 3 tier grading system is used, than any TaG2 tumor would also be considered IR disease regardless of whether new diagnosis or recurrent. Adjunctive management should then be based on established risk factors. PATIENT SUMMARY: Standardizing the definition of intermediate-risk (IR) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), which is a heterogeneous disease, is critical for appropriate management of patients. The International Bladder Cancer Group recommends classification of IR NMIBC tumors and personalized management based on the following risk factors: multifocal tumor (more than one), early recurrence (<1 yr), frequent recurrence (>1/yr), tumor size (≥3 cm), and previous intravesical treatment.
