PURPOSE: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) recommendations differ between the 2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) and 2019 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society (ESC/EAS) guidelines for patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (< 70 vs. < 55 mg/dl, respectively). In the DA VINCI study, residual cardiovascular risk was predicted in ASCVD patients. The extent to which relative and absolute risk might be lowered by achieving ACC/AHA versus ESC/EAS LDL-C recommended approaches was simulated. METHODS: DA VINCI was a cross-sectional observational study of patients prescribed lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) across 18 European countries. Ten-year cardiovascular risk (CVR) was predicted among ASCVD patients receiving stabilized LLT. For patients with LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dl, the absolute LDL-C reduction required to achieve an LDL-C of < 70 or < 55 mg/dl (LDL-C of 69 or 54 mg/dl, respectively) was calculated. Relative and absolute risk reductions (RRRs and ARRs) were simulated. RESULTS: Of the 2039 patients, 61% did not achieve LDL-C < 70 mg/dl. For patients with LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dl, median (interquartile range) baseline LDL-C and 10-year CVR were 93 (81-115) mg/dl and 32% (25-43%), respectively. Median LDL-C reductions of 24 (12-46) and 39 (27-91) mg/dl were needed to achieve an LDL-C of 69 and 54 mg/dl, respectively. Attaining ACC/AHA or ESC/EAS goals resulted in simulated RRRs of 14% (7-25%) and 22% (15-32%), respectively, and ARRs of 4% (2-7%) and 6% (4-9%), respectively. CONCLUSION: In ASCVD patients, achieving ESC/EAS LDL-C goals could result in a 2% additional ARR over 10 years versus the ACC/AHA approach.

• Klíčová slova
• Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, Cardiovascular disease prevention, Cardiovascular risk, LDL-C, Lipid-lowering, Statins,
• MeSH
• ateroskleróza * diagnóza   farmakoterapie   epidemiologie   MeSH
• chování snižující riziko MeSH
• kardiovaskulární nemoci * diagnóza   epidemiologie   prevence a kontrola   MeSH
• LDL-cholesterol MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• průřezové studie MeSH
• rizikové faktory MeSH
• statiny * terapeutické užití   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• pozorovací studie MeSH
• Geografické názvy
• Spojené státy americké epidemiologie   MeSH
• Názvy látek
• LDL-cholesterol MeSH
• statiny * MeSH

AIMS: To provide contemporary data on the implementation of European guideline recommendations for lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) across different settings and populations and how this impacts low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal achievement. METHODS AND RESULTS: An 18 country, cross-sectional, observational study of patients prescribed LLT for primary or secondary prevention in primary or secondary care across Europe. Between June 2017 and November 2018, data were collected at a single visit, including LLT in the preceding 12 months and most recent LDL-C. Primary outcome was the achievement of risk-based 2016 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) LDL-C goal while receiving stabilized LLT; 2019 goal achievement was also assessed. Overall, 5888 patients (3000 primary and 2888 secondary prevention patients) were enrolled; 54% [95% confidence interval (CI) 52-56] achieved their risk-based 2016 goal and 33% (95% CI 32-35) achieved their risk-based 2019 goal. High-intensity statin monotherapy was used in 20% and 38% of very high-risk primary and secondary prevention patients, respectively. Corresponding 2016 goal attainment was 22% and 45% (17% and 22% for 2019 goals) for very high-risk primary and secondary prevention patients, respectively. Use of moderate-high-intensity statins in combination with ezetimibe (9%), or any LLT with PCSK9 inhibitors (1%), was low; corresponding 2016 and 2019 goal attainment was 53% and 20% (ezetimibe combination), and 67% and 58% (PCSK9i combination). CONCLUSION: Gaps between clinical guidelines and clinical practice for lipid management across Europe persist, which will be exacerbated by the 2019 guidelines. Even with optimized statins, greater utilization of non-statin LLT is likely needed to reduce these gaps for patients at highest risk.

• Klíčová slova
• Cholesterol, Guidelines, Lipids, Registry, Statins,
• MeSH
• anticholesteremika * škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• biologické markery MeSH
• dyslipidemie * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• kardiovaskulární nemoci * diagnóza   epidemiologie   prevence a kontrola   MeSH
• LDL-cholesterol MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• primární zdravotní péče MeSH
• proproteinkonvertasa subtilisin/kexin typu 9 MeSH
• průřezové studie MeSH
• rizikové faktory MeSH
• statiny * terapeutické užití   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• pozorovací studie MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• Názvy látek
• anticholesteremika * MeSH
• biologické markery MeSH
• LDL-cholesterol MeSH
• PCSK9 protein, human MeSH Prohlížeč
• proproteinkonvertasa subtilisin/kexin typu 9 MeSH
• statiny * MeSH

AIMS: In the TRial to assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by optimizing platelet inhibitioN with prasugrel Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 38 (TRITON-TIMI 38), prasugrel reduced the primary ischaemic endpoint as compared with clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients planned to undergo percutaneous coronary interventions, but increased the risk of bleeding. The present analysis shows the efficacy and safety data for the 10,074 non-ST segment elevation (NSTE)-ACS patients included in that trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: The primary endpoint was significantly reduced by prasugrel in the overall NSTE-ACS population (hazard ratio (HR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73-0.93, p=0.002) as well as in unstable angina (UA) and in non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patient subgroups (interaction p value=0.39). Although non-coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) TIMI major bleeding was increased with prasugrel as compared with clopidogrel (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.05-1.88, p=0.02), there was a net clinical benefit in patients assigned to prasugrel (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.80-1.00, p=0.043), which was consistent for UA and NSTEMI subgroups (interaction p value=0.84 and 0.72). In patients who met the criteria for prasugrel use recommended by the European Medicines Agency, thus excluding from the analysis patients with prior transient ischemic attack (TIA)/stroke, with weight <60 kg or age ≥75 years, and censoring follow-up at 365 days, (European Union (EU)-label cohort) prasugrel showed superiority over clopidogrel with regard to the primary endpoint (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.63-0.85, p<0.0001) for the entire NSTE-ACS population, as well as for UA patients and NSTEMI patients without significant differences in non-CABG TIMI major bleeding. CONCLUSION: Prasugrel, as compared with clopidogrel, significantly reduced the primary endpoint of the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial in NSTE-ACS patients, as well as in the UA and NSTEMI groups. A significant reduction in the primary endpoint without increased bleeding was observed in the EU-label cohort.

• Klíčová slova
• Acute coronary syndrome, clopidogrel, percutaneous coronary intervention, prasugrel,
• MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• infarkt myokardu farmakoterapie   MeSH
• inhibitory agregace trombocytů terapeutické užití   MeSH
• klopidogrel MeSH
• krvácení chemicky indukované   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nestabilní angina pectoris farmakoterapie   MeSH
• piperaziny terapeutické užití   MeSH
• prasugrel hydrochlorid MeSH
• rizikové faktory MeSH
• thiofeny terapeutické užití   MeSH
• tiklopidin analogy a deriváty   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
• srovnávací studie MeSH
• Názvy látek
• inhibitory agregace trombocytů MeSH
• klopidogrel MeSH
• piperaziny MeSH
• prasugrel hydrochlorid MeSH
• thiofeny MeSH
• tiklopidin MeSH

AIMS: Patient access to reperfusion therapy and the use of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI) or thrombolysis (TL) varies considerably between European countries. The aim of this study was to obtain a realistic contemporary picture of how patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are treated in different European countries. METHODS AND RESULTS: The chairpersons of the national working groups/societies of interventional cardiology in European countries and selected experts known to be involved in the national registries joined the writing group upon invitation. Data were collected about the country and any existing national STEMI or PCI registries, about STEMI epidemiology, and treatment in each given country and about PCI and p-PCI centres and procedures in each country. Results from the national and/or regional registries in 30 countries were included in this analysis. The annual incidence of hospital admission for any acute myocardial infarction (AMI) varied between 90-312/100 thousand/year, the incidence of STEMI alone ranging from 44 to 142. Primary PCI was the dominant reperfusion strategy in 16 countries and TL in 8 countries. The use of a p-PCI strategy varied between 5 and 92% (of all STEMI patients) and the use of TL between 0 and 55%. Any reperfusion treatment (p-PCI or TL) was used in 37-93% of STEMI patients. Significantly less reperfusion therapy was used in those countries where TL was the dominant strategy. The number of p-PCI procedures per million per year varied among countries between 20 and 970. The mean population served by a single p-PCI centre varied between 0.3 and 7.4 million inhabitants. In those countries offering p-PCI services to the majority of their STEMI patients, this population varied between 0.3 and 1.1 million per centre. In-hospital mortality of all consecutive STEMI patients varied between 4.2 and 13.5%, for patients treated by TL between 3.5 and 14% and for patients treated by p-PCI between 2.7 and 8%. The time reported from symptom onset to the first medical contact (FMC) varied between 60 and 210 min, FMC-needle time for TL between 30 and 110 min, and FMC-balloon time for p-PCI between 60 and 177 min. CONCLUSION: Most North, West, and Central European countries used p-PCI for the majority of their STEMI patients. The lack of organized p-PCI networks was associated with fewer patients overall receiving some form of reperfusion therapy.

• MeSH
• balónková koronární angioplastika statistika a číselné údaje   MeSH
• časové faktory MeSH
• charakteristiky bydlení MeSH
• dostupnost zdravotnických služeb MeSH
• hospitalizace statistika a číselné údaje   MeSH
• incidence MeSH
• infarkt myokardu epidemiologie   terapie   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mortalita v nemocnicích MeSH
• odhad potřeb MeSH
• reperfuze myokardu metody   statistika a číselné údaje   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• Geografické názvy
• Evropa epidemiologie   MeSH