BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the predictors of sustainability of biologic drugs for paediatric patients with Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: The Czech National Prospective Registry of Biologic and Targeted Therapy of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (CREdIT) was used to identify the biologic treatment courses in paediatric patients with CD. Mixed-effects Cox models and propensity score analyses were employed to evaluate predictors of treatment sustainability. RESULTS: Among the 558 observations of 473 patients, 264 were treated with adalimumab (47%), 240 with infliximab (43%), 41 with ustekinumab (7%), and 13 with vedolizumab (2%). Multivariable analysis revealed higher discontinuation risk with infliximab compared to adalimumab (HR = 0.600, 95%CI 0.389-0.926), both overall and in first-line treatment (HR = 0.302, 95%CI 0.103-0.890). Infliximab versus adalimumab was associated with shorter time to escalation (HR = 0.094, 95%CI 0.043-0.203). Propensity-score analysis demonstrated lower sustainability of infliximab (HR = 0.563, 95%CI 1.159-2.725). The time since diagnosis to treatment initiation (HR = 0.852, 95%CI 0.781-0.926) was the most important predictor. Baseline immunosuppressive therapy prolonged sustainability with infliximab (HR = 2.899, 95%CI 1.311-6.410). CONCLUSIONS: Given the results suggesting shorter sustainability, the need for earlier intensification and thus higher drug exposure, and the greater need for immunosuppression with infliximab than with adalimumab, the choice of these drugs cannot be considered completely equitable. IMPACT: Our study identified predictors of sustainability of biologic treatment in paediatric patients with Crohn's disease, including adalimumab (versus infliximab), early initiation of biologic treatment, and normalised baseline haemoglobin levels. Infliximab treatment was associated with earlier intensification, higher drug exposure, and a greater need for immunosuppression. Parents and patients should be fully informed of the disadvantages of intravenous infliximab versus adalimumab during the decision-making process. This study emphasises the importance of not delaying the initiation of biologic therapy in paediatric patients with Crohn's disease.

• MeSH
• adalimumab * terapeutické užití   MeSH
• biologické přípravky terapeutické užití   MeSH
• Crohnova nemoc * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• dítě MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky terapeutické užití   MeSH
• infliximab * terapeutické užití   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• proporcionální rizikové modely MeSH
• prospektivní studie MeSH
• registrace * MeSH
• tendenční skóre MeSH
• ustekinumab terapeutické užití   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dítě MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• Názvy látek
• adalimumab * MeSH
• biologické přípravky MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky MeSH
• infliximab * MeSH
• ustekinumab MeSH
• vedolizumab MeSH Prohlížeč

INTRODUCTION: Two antitumor necrosis factor therapies (infliximab [IFX] and adalimumab [ADA]) have been approved for the treatment of pediatric Crohn's disease (CD) but have not been compared in head-to-head trials. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ADA and IFX by propensity score matching in a prospective cohort of pediatric patients with luminal CD and at least a 24-month follow-up. METHODS: Among 100 patients, 75 met the inclusion criteria, and 62 were matched by propensity score. We evaluated time to treatment escalation as the primary outcome and primary nonresponse, predictors of treatment escalation and relapse, serious adverse events, pharmacokinetics, and effect of concomitant immunomodulators as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: There was no difference between ADA and IFX in time to treatment escalation (HR = 0.63 [95% CI 0.31-1.28] P = 0.20), primary nonresponse (P = 0.95), or serious adverse events. The median (interquartile range) trough levels at the primary outcome were 14.05 (10.88-15.40) and 6.15 (2.08-6.58) µg/mL in the ADA and IFX groups, respectively. On a multivariate analysis, the combination of anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody negativity and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positivity was a strong independent predictor of treatment escalation (HR 5.19, [95% CI 2.41-11.18], P < 0.0001). The simple endoscopic score for CD, L3 disease phenotype, and use of concomitant immunomodulators for at least the first 6 months revealed a trend toward significance on a univariate analysis. DISCUSSION: Propensity score matching did not reveal substantial differences in efficacy or safety between ADA and IFX. The anti-S. cerevisiae antibody negativity and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positivity combination is a strong predictor of treatment escalation.

• MeSH
• adalimumab škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• Crohnova nemoc * diagnóza   farmakoterapie   MeSH
• dítě MeSH
• imunologické faktory MeSH
• infliximab terapeutické užití   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• prospektivní studie MeSH
• protilátky proti cytoplazmě neutrofilů MeSH
• tendenční skóre MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dítě MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• Názvy látek
• adalimumab MeSH
• imunologické faktory MeSH
• infliximab MeSH
• protilátky proti cytoplazmě neutrofilů MeSH

Studies showing a substantial frequency of dermatologic complications in paediatric Crohn's disease (CD) patients on anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy preferentially include patients treated with infliximab. We aimed to identify risk factors for the cumulative incidence of skin complications in a paediatric cohort receiving either adalimumab or infliximab and found an association between current skin complications and the patient's current clinical condition. This study retrospectively evaluated dermatologic complications in an inception cohort of 100 paediatric CD patients receiving the first anti-TNF (Motol PIBD cohort). Patient data were collected every 3 months. The lesions were classified as psoriatic, atopic dermatitis, or others. We used Cox regression to evaluate the association between predefined variables and the time to complication and a generalised linear mixed model to assess the association between the patient's current condition and the occurrence of complications. Among the 89 included children, 35 (39%) presented with dermatologic lesions. The only predictor associated with any complication was infliximab (versus adalimumab) therapy (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-4.17; p = 0.04). Infliximab therapy (HR: 5.5; 95%CI: 1.59-19.06; p = 0.01) and a family history of atopy (HR: 3.4; 95%CI 1.35-8.57, p = 0.002) were associated with early manifestation of atopic dermatitis. Lower C-reactive protein levels (odds ratio [OR], 0.947; 95% CI, - 0.898 to 0.998; p = 0.046) and infliximab (versus adalimumab) were associated with the occurrence of any dermatologic complications (OR, 5.93; 95% CI, 1.59-22.07; p = 0.008).Conclusion: The frequency of skin complications seems high in paediatric CD patients treated with anti-TNF and is even higher in those treated with infliximab. What is Known: •The dermatologic complications occur during treatment with anti-tumour necrosis factor. •The frequency of skin complications in paediatric patients with Crohn's disease is high. What is New: •Infliximab (vs. adalimumab) was identified as a strong risk factor for the cumulative incidence of skin complications. •Lower C-reactive protein levels were associated with the current occurrence of dermatologic complications.

• Klíčová slova
• Adalimumab, Eczema, Infliximab, Psoriasis, Skin complications,
• MeSH
• Crohnova nemoc * komplikace   farmakoterapie   MeSH
• dítě MeSH
• infliximab škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• inhibitory TNF * MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• retrospektivní studie MeSH
• rizikové faktory MeSH
• TNF-alfa MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dítě MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• Názvy látek
• infliximab MeSH
• inhibitory TNF * MeSH
• TNF-alfa MeSH

Infliximab (IFX) is administered intravenously using weight-based dosing (5 mg/kg) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Our hypothesis is that especially young children need a more intensive treatment regimen than the current weight-based dose administration. We aimed to assess IFX pharmacokinetics (PK), based on existing therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) data in IBD patients < 10 years. TDM data were collected retrospectively in 14 centres. Children treated with IFX were included if IFX was started as IBD treatment at age < 10 years (young patients, YP) and PK data were available. Older IBD patients aged 10-18 years were used as controls (older patients, OP). Two hundred and fifteen paediatric inflammatory bowel disease (PIBD) patients were eligible for the study (110 < 10 year; 105 ≥ 10 years). Median age was 8.3 years (IQR 6.9-8.9) in YP compared with 14.3 years (IQR 12.8-15.6) in OP at the start of IFX. At the start of maintenance treatment, 72% of YP had trough levels below therapeutic range (< 5.4 μg/mL). After 1 year of scheduled IFX maintenance treatment, YP required a significantly higher dose per 8 weeks compared with OP (YP; 9.0 mg/kg (IQR 5.0-12.9) vs. OP; 5.5 mg/kg (IQR 5.0-9.3); p < 0.001). The chance to develop antibodies to infliximab was relatively lower in OP than YP (0.329 (95% CI - 1.2 to - 1.01); p < 0.001), while the overall duration of response to IFX was not significantly different (after 2 years 53% (n = 29) in YP vs. 58% (n = 45) in OP; p = 0.56).Conclusion: Intensification of the induction scheme is suggested for PIBD patients aged < 10 years. What is Known? •Infliximab trough levels of paediatric IBD patients are influenced by several factors as dosing scheme, antibodies and inflammatory markers. •In 4.5-30% of the paediatric IBD patients, infliximab treatment was stopped within the first year. What is New? •The majority of young PIBD (< 10 years) have inadequate IFX trough levels at the start of maintenance treatment. •Young PIBD patients (< 10 years) were in need of a more intensive treatment regimen compared with older paediatric patients during 1 year of IFX treatment. •The chance to develop antibodies to infliximab was relatively higher in young PIBD patients (< 10 years).

• Klíčová slova
• Anti-TNF, Biologics, Clinical pharmacology, Crohn’s disease, Gastroenterology, Paediatric, Ulcerative colitis,
• MeSH
• dítě MeSH
• gastrointestinální látky * terapeutické užití   MeSH
• idiopatické střevní záněty * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• infliximab * terapeutické užití   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• předškolní dítě MeSH
• retrospektivní studie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dítě MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• předškolní dítě MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• Názvy látek
• gastrointestinální látky * MeSH
• infliximab * MeSH