INTRODUCTION: Currently, there is no accurate diagnostic molecular biomarker for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The aim of this study was to assess the expression of microRNA-15a (miR-15a) in urine of patients with RCC and to evaluate its potential as a diagnostic molecular biomarker. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 67 patients with solid renal tumors were enrolled: clear-cell RCC (ccRCC, n = 22), papillary RCC (pRCC, n = 16), chromophobe RCC (chRCC, n = 14), oncocytoma (n = 8), papillary adenoma (n = 2) and angiomyolipoma (n = 5). MiRNA-15a expression levels measurement in urine were performed using qPCR. Urine of 15 healthy volunteers without kidney pathology was used as control. RESULTS: We observed a difference in mean miR-15a expression values in groups of pre-operative patients with RCC, benign renal tumors and healthy persons (2.50E-01 ± 2.72E-01 vs 1.32E-03 ± 3.90E-03 vs 3.36E-07 ± 1.04E-07 RFU, respectively, p < 0.01). There was no difference in miR-15a expression between ccRCC, pRCC and chRCC (p > 0.05). Direct association between RCC size and miR-15a expression values was obtained (Pearson correlation coefficient-0.873). On the 8th day after nephrectomy, mean expression value in patients with RCC decreased by 99.53% (p < 0.01). MiR-15a expression differentiated RCC from benign renal tumors with 98.1% specificity, 100% sensitivity at a cut-off value of 5.00E-06 RFU, with AUC-0.955. CONCLUSIONS: MiR-15a expression measured in urine may be used as diagnostic molecular biomarker for RCC.

• Klíčová slova
• Biomarker, Diagnosis, MiRNA-15a, Molecular marker, Renal cell carcinoma,
• MeSH
• adenom moč   MeSH
• angiomyolipom moč   MeSH
• karcinom z renálních buněk diagnóza   patologie   chirurgie   moč   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mikro RNA moč   MeSH
• nádorové biomarkery moč   MeSH
• nádory ledvin diagnóza   patologie   chirurgie   moč   MeSH
• nefrektomie MeSH
• oxyfilní adenom moč   MeSH
• polymerázová řetězová reakce MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• senzitivita a specificita MeSH
• staging nádorů MeSH
• studie případů a kontrol MeSH
• tumor burden MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• Názvy látek
• mikro RNA MeSH
• MIRN15 microRNA, human MeSH Prohlížeč
• nádorové biomarkery MeSH

INTRODUCTION: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for approximately 3% of adult malignancies and more than 90% of neoplasms arising from the kidney. Uninformative percutaneous kidney biopsies vary from 10 to 23%. As a result, 7.5-33.6% of partial nephrectomies in patients with small renal masses (SRM) are performed on benign renal tumors. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of MRI, as RCC imaging biomarker for differentiation of SRM. METHOD: Adult patients (n = 158) with 170 SRM were enrolled into this study. The control group were healthy volunteers with normal clinical and radiologic findings (n = 15). All participants underwent MRI with DWI sequence included. RESULTS: Mean ADC values of solid RCC (1.65 ± 0.38 × 10-3 mm2/s) were lower than healthy renal parenchyma (2.47 ± 0.12 × 10-3 mm2/s, p < 0.05). There was no difference between mean ADC values of ccRCC, pRCC and chRCC (1.82 ± 0.22 × 10-3 vs 1.61 ± 0.07 × 10-3 vs 1.46 ± 0.09 × 10-3 mm2/s, respectively, p = ns). An inverse relationship between mean ADC values and Fuhrman grade of nuclear atypia of solid ccRCCs was observed: grade I-1.92 ± 0.11 × 10-3 mm2/s, grade II-1.84 ± 0.14 × 10-3 mm2/s, grade III-1.79 ± 0.10 × 10-3 mm2/s, grade IV-1.72 ± 0.06 × 10-3 mm2/s. This was significant (p < 0.05) only between tumors of I and IV grades. Significant difference (p < 0.05) between mean ADC values of solid RCCs, benign renal tumors and renal cysts was observed (1.65 ± 0.38 × 10-3 vs 2.23 ± 0.18 × 10-3 vs 3.15 ± 0.51 × 10-3 mm2/s, respectively). In addition, there was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in mean ADC values between benign cysts and cystic RCC (3.36 ± 0.35 × 10-3 vs 2.83 ± 0.21 × 10-3 mm2/s, respectively). CONCLUSION: ADC maps with b values of 0 and 800 s/mm2 can be used as an imaging biomarker, to differentiate benign SRM from malignant SRM. Using ADC value threshold of 1.75 × 10-3 mm2/s allows to differentiate solid RCC from solid benign kidney tumors with 91% sensitivity and 89% specificity; ADC value threshold of 2.96 × 10-3 mm2/s distinguishes cystic RCC from benign renal cysts with 90% sensitivity and 88% specificity. However, the possibility of differentiation between ccRCC histologic subtypes and grades, utilizing ADC values, is limited.

• Klíčová slova
• Apparent diffusion coefficient, Diffusion-weighted imaging, MRI, Renal cell carcinoma, Small renal masses,
• MeSH
• cystická onemocnění ledvin diagnóza   MeSH
• diferenciální diagnóza MeSH
• difuzní magnetická rezonance metody   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• karcinom z renálních buněk * diagnóza   patologie   chirurgie   MeSH
• léčba šetřící orgány metody   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nádory ledvin * diagnóza   patologie   chirurgie   MeSH
• nefrektomie metody   MeSH
• reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• senzitivita a specificita MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH