Nejvíce citovaný článek - PubMed ID 24666582
Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the Czech population-based registry
BACKGROUND: The addition of monoclonal antibodies targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR Abs) to chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) is commonly delayed in the real-world clinical practice, usually because of late RAS testing results. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether delayed addition of anti-EGFR mAbs up to the fourth cycle of backbone chemotherapy adversely affected outcomes of mCRC patients treated with first-line regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical data of patients with histologically verified, RAS wild-type mCRC treated with first-line systemic therapy regimens containing anti-EGFR mAbs were retrospectively analysed from a national database. Patients were divided into three groups according to the timing of anti-EGFR mAbs addition to the chemotherapy backbone. Cohort A (n = 401) included patients in whom anti-EGFR mAbs were added to chemotherapy from the first cycle, cohort B (n = 71) patients with anti-EGFR mAbs added to chemotherapy from the second cycle, and cohort C (n = 101) patients who had anti-EGFR mAbs added to chemotherapy from the third or fourth cycle. RESULTS: Three hundred and thirty-six (58.6%) patients received panitumumab and 237 (41.4%) patients received cetuximab. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the whole cohort was 12.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.9-13.5), and the median overall survival (OS) was 33.5 months (95% CI 27.6-39.4). The median PFS and OS for patients treated with anti-EGFR mAbs added to chemotherapy were 12.9 (95% CI 11.5-14.3) and 30.6 months (95% CI 25.2-36.1) for cohort A, 9.7 (95% CI 9.1-10.3) and not reached for cohort B, compared to 11.5 (95% CI 9.8-13.2) and 37.9 months (95% CI 28.6-47.3) for cohort C, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed addition of anti-EGFR mAbs to first-line chemotherapy was not associated with inferior survival or response rates.
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- kolorektální nádory farmakoterapie patologie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- metastázy nádorů MeSH
- monoklonální protilátky farmakologie terapeutické užití MeSH
- registrace MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- monoklonální protilátky MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To describe the use of regorafenib for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in clinical practice in the Czech Republic, and to describe the clinical outcomes of patients in terms of safety and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The data of patients treated with regorafenib were extracted from the national CORECT registry. The CORECT registry is a non-interventional post-marketing database, gathering information about patients with CRC and treated with targeted agents. Twenty oncology centres in the Czech Republic contributed to this registry. Collected data included patients' characteristics, disease history, cancer treatments, response to treatments and safety. RESULTS: A total of 148 patients treated with regorafenib in clinical practice were analysed. At regorafenib initiation, almost all patients were fully active or slightly restricted in physical activity. Regorafenib was not administered as first-line treatment in any patient. Median progression-free survival was 3.5 months and median overall survival was 9.3 months. One-year survival rate was 44.6 %. Four partial responses were observed and 51 stable diseases. Progression was observed in 66 patients (44.6 %). The main reported adverse events were skin toxicity (5.4 %) and fatigue (2.0 %). CONCLUSIONS: Regorafenib is a well-established treatment for pretreated patients with mCRC, however real-life data are scarce. Our results demonstrated slightly better efficacy of regorafenib and better safety profile in patients with mCRC compared to the randomised trials.
- MeSH
- fenylmočovinové sloučeniny aplikace a dávkování farmakologie terapeutické užití MeSH
- kolorektální nádory farmakoterapie patologie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- metastázy nádorů MeSH
- protinádorové látky terapeutické užití MeSH
- pyridiny aplikace a dávkování farmakologie terapeutické užití MeSH
- registrace MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
- Názvy látek
- fenylmočovinové sloučeniny MeSH
- protinádorové látky MeSH
- pyridiny MeSH
- regorafenib MeSH Prohlížeč
BACKGROUND: The aim of the present retrospective study was to analyze clinical outcome and risk factors associated with treatment outcomes according to KRAS status in patient with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with bevacizumab (bev) plus chemotherapy in the first-line setting. METHODS: We performed observational study on 1622 patients with mCRC treated with bev plus oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based chemotherapy, and correlated treatment outcomes with KRAS mutation status. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and additionally overall survival (OS). Adverse events of bevacizumab and risk factors including location of metastases were evaluated. RESULTS: Mutation in KRAS was present in 40.6% of mCRC cases. The median PFS in patients with wild-type KRAS (wtKRAS) vs mutant KRAS was 11.5 vs 11.4 months, respectively. The median OS was 30.7 vs 28.4 months (p = 0.312). Patients with KRAS mutation had lung metastases more frequently than wtKRAS individuals (32.0% vs 23.8%; p = 0.001). We observed no difference in clinical outcome between hepatic and extrahepatic metastatic disease. CONCLUSION: KRAS mutation does not interfere with clinical benefit from first-line treatment with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in mCRC patients.
- MeSH
- bevacizumab aplikace a dávkování škodlivé účinky MeSH
- capecitabinum MeSH
- deoxycytidin analogy a deriváty terapeutické užití MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- fluoruracil analogy a deriváty terapeutické užití MeSH
- irinotekan MeSH
- kamptothecin aplikace a dávkování analogy a deriváty terapeutické užití MeSH
- kolorektální nádory genetika patologie MeSH
- leukovorin terapeutické užití MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- míra přežití MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mutace MeSH
- nádory jater farmakoterapie genetika sekundární MeSH
- nádory plic farmakoterapie genetika sekundární MeSH
- organoplatinové sloučeniny aplikace a dávkování terapeutické užití MeSH
- oxalacetáty MeSH
- oxaliplatin MeSH
- přežití bez známek nemoci MeSH
- protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- protoonkogenní proteiny p21(ras) MeSH
- protoonkogenní proteiny genetika MeSH
- Ras proteiny genetika MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- pozorovací studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- bevacizumab MeSH
- capecitabinum MeSH
- deoxycytidin MeSH
- fluoruracil MeSH
- irinotekan MeSH
- kamptothecin MeSH
- KRAS protein, human MeSH Prohlížeč
- leukovorin MeSH
- organoplatinové sloučeniny MeSH
- oxalacetáty MeSH
- oxaliplatin MeSH
- protoonkogenní proteiny p21(ras) MeSH
- protoonkogenní proteiny MeSH
- Ras proteiny MeSH