Monoclonal antibodies have become a mainstay in the treatment of patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) and provide some benefit to patients with primary progressive MS. They are highly precise by specifically targeting molecules displayed on cells involved in distinct immune mechanisms of MS pathophysiology. They not only differ in the target antigen they recognize but also by the mode of action that generates their therapeutic effect. Natalizumab, an [Formula: see text]4[Formula: see text]1 integrin antagonist, works via binding to cell surface receptors, blocking the interaction with their ligands and, in that way, preventing the migration of leukocytes across the blood-brain barrier. On the other hand, the anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody alemtuzumab and the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, and ublituximab work via eliminating selected pathogenic cell populations. However, potential adverse effects may be serious and can necessitate treatment discontinuation. Most importantly, those are the risk for (opportunistic) infections, but also secondary autoimmune diseases or malignancies. Monoclonal antibodies also carry the risk of infusion/injection-related reactions, primarily in early phases of treatment. By careful patient selection and monitoring during therapy, the occurrence of these potentially serious adverse effects can be minimized. Monoclonal antibodies are characterized by a relatively long pharmacologic half-life and pharmacodynamic effects, which provides advantages such as permitting infrequent dosing, but also creates disadvantages regarding vaccination and family planning. This review presents an overview of currently available monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of RMS, including their mechanism of action, efficacy and safety profile. Furthermore, we provide practical recommendations for risk management, vaccination, and family planning.

• Keywords
• Alemtuzumab, Disease-modifying therapy, Monoclonal antibodies, Multiple sclerosis, Natalizumab, Ocrelizumab, Ofatumumab, Rituximab, Ublituximab,
• MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Antibodies, Monoclonal therapeutic use   MeSH
• Natalizumab therapeutic use   MeSH
• Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological * therapeutic use   MeSH
• Risk Management MeSH
• Multiple Sclerosis * therapy   MeSH
• Pregnancy MeSH
• Vaccination MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Pregnancy MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Review MeSH
• Names of Substances
• Antibodies, Monoclonal MeSH
• Natalizumab MeSH
• Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological * MeSH

OBJECTIVE: To describe the dynamics of brain volume loss (BVL) at different stages of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), to describe the association between BVL and clinical measures, and to investigate an effect of treatment escalation on the rate of BVL. METHODS: Together, 1903 patients predominantly with RRMS from the Avonex-Steroids-Azathioprine cohort (N = 166), the study of early IFN-β1a treatment cohort (N = 180), and the quantitative MRI cohort (N = 1,557) with ≥2 MRI scans and ≥1-year of follow-up were included. Brain MRI scans (N = 7,203) were performed using a single 1.5-T machine. Relationships between age or disease duration and global and tissue-specific BVL rates were analyzed using mixed models. RESULTS: Age was not associated with the rate of BVL (β = -0.003; Cohen f2 = 0.0005; adjusted p = 0.39). Although disease duration was associated with the rate of BVL, its effect on the BVL rate was minimal (β = -0.012; Cohen f2 = 0.004; adjusted p = 4 × 10-5). Analysis of association between tissue-specific brain volume changes and age (β = -0.019 to -0.011; adjusted p = 0.028-1.00) or disease duration (β = -0.028 to -0.008; adjusted p = 0.16-0.96) confirmed these results. Although increase in the relapse rate (β = 0.10; adjusted p = 9 × 10-9), Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS; β = 0.17; adjusted p = 8 × 10-5), and EDSS change (β = 0.15; adjusted p = 2 × 10-5) were associated with accelerated rate of BVL, their effect on the rate of BVL was minimal (all Cohen f2 ≤ 0.007). In 94 patients who escalated therapy, the rate of BVL decreased following treatment escalation by 0.29% (β = -0.29; Cohen f2 = 0.133; p = 5.5 × 10-8). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of BVL is relatively stable throughout the course of RRMS. The accelerated BVL is weakly associated with concurrent higher disease activity, and timely escalation to high-efficacy immunotherapy helps decrease the rate of BVL.

• MeSH
• Atrophy pathology   MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Cohort Studies MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Longitudinal Studies MeSH
• Magnetic Resonance Imaging MeSH
• Brain pathology   MeSH
• Disease Progression MeSH
• Prospective Studies MeSH
• Multiple Sclerosis pathology   MeSH
• Check Tag
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Clinical Trial MeSH
• Observational Study MeSH
• Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
• Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the strength of the association between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metrics and cognitive outcomes differs between various multiple sclerosis subpopulations. METHODS: A total of 1052 patients were included in this large cross-sectional study. Brain MRI (T1 and T2 lesion volume and brain parenchymal fraction) and neuropsychological assessment (Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis and Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test) were performed. RESULTS: Weak correlations between cognitive domains and MRI measures were observed in younger patients (age≤30 years; absolute Spearman's rho = 0.05-0.21), with short disease duration (<2 years; rho = 0.01-0.21), low Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] (≤1.5; rho = 0.08-0.18), low T2 lesion volume (lowest quartile; <0.59 mL; rho = 0.01-0.20), and high brain parenchymal fraction (highest quartile; >86.66; rho = 0.01-0.16). Stronger correlations between cognitive domains and MRI measures were observed in older patients (age>50 years; rho = 0.24-0.50), with longer disease duration (>15 years; rho = 0.26-0.53), higher EDSS (≥5.0; rho = 0.23-0.39), greater T2 lesion volume (highest quartile; >5.33 mL; rho = 0.16-0.32), and lower brain parenchymal fraction (lowest quartile; <83.71; rho = 0.13-0.46). The majority of these observed results were confirmed by significant interactions (P ≤ 0.01) using continuous variables. INTERPRETATION: The association between structural brain damage and functional cognitive impairment is substantially weaker in multiple sclerosis patients with a low disease burden. Therefore, disease stage should be taken into consideration when interpreting associations between structural and cognitive measures in clinical trials, research studies, and clinical practice.

• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH