Mouth-to-microphone (MTM) distance is important when measuring the sound of voice. However, determining the MTM distance for laryngoscope-mounted microphones during laryngoscopic examinations is cumbersome. We introduce a novel solution for such cases, using the depth of insertion of the laryngoscope into the mouth DI as a reference distance. We measured the average insertion depth, DI, in 60 adult women and 60 adult men for rigid laryngoscopes with 70° and 90° view. We found the DI for the 70°/90° laryngoscope to be 9.7 ± 0.9/9.4 ± 0.6 cm in men, 8.9 ± 0.9/8.7 ± 0.7 cm in women, and 9.3 ± 0.9/9.0 ± 0.7 cm in all adults. Using these values, we show that, for microphones fixed at 15-40 cm from the tip of the laryngoscope, the final MTM distances are between 5 and 35 cm from the lips, and the standard uncertainties of these distances are between 16% and 2.5%. Our solution allows laryngologists and laryngoscope manufacturers to set and estimate the MTM distance for any rigid laryngeal endoscope with a microphone attached with reasonable accuracy, avoiding the need to measure this distance in vivo in routine practice.

• Klíčová slova
• mouth-to-microphone distance, oral cavity length, rigid laryngoscopy, voice recording,
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH

INTRODUCTION: To update the European guidelines for the assessment of voice quality (VQ) in clinical practice. METHODS: Nineteen laryngologists-phoniatricians of the European Laryngological Society (ELS) and the Union of the European Phoniatricians (UEP) participated to a modified Delphi process to propose statements about subjective and objective VQ assessments. Two anonymized voting rounds determined a consensus statement to be acceptable when 80% of experts agreed with a rating of at least 3/4. The statements with ≥ 3/4 score by 60-80% of experts were improved and resubmitted to voting until they were validated or rejected. RESULTS: Of the 90 initial statements, 51 were validated after two voting rounds. A multidimensional set of minimal VQ evaluations was proposed and included: baseline VQ anamnesis (e.g., allergy, medical and surgical history, medication, addiction, singing practice, job, and posture), videolaryngostroboscopy (mucosal wave symmetry, amplitude, morphology, and movements), patient-reported VQ assessment (30- or 10-voice handicap index), perception (Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, and Strain), aerodynamics (maximum phonation time), acoustics (Mean F0, Jitter, Shimmer, and noise-to-harmonic ratio), and clinical instruments associated with voice comorbidities (reflux symptom score, reflux sign assessment, eating-assessment tool-10, and dysphagia handicap index). For perception, aerodynamics and acoustics, experts provided guidelines for the methods of measurement. Some additional VQ evaluations are proposed for voice professionals or patients with some laryngeal diseases. CONCLUSION: The ELS-UEP consensus for VQ assessment provides clinical statements for the baseline and pre- to post-treatment evaluations of VQ and to improve collaborative research by adopting common and validated VQ evaluation approach.

• Klíčová slova
• Assessment, Consensus, Dysphonia, European, Evaluation, Guidelines, Head, Neck, Otolaryngology, Surgery, Voice,
• MeSH
• hlas * MeSH
• kvalita hlasu MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nemoci laryngu * MeSH
• otorinolaryngologie * MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH