Recommended Protocols for Instrumental Assessment of Voice: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Expert Panel to Develop a Protocol for Instrumental Assessment of Vocal Function
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu konsensus - konference, časopisecké články, směrnice pro lékařskou praxi, přehledy
PubMed
29955816
DOI
10.1044/2018_ajslp-17-0009
PII: 2686671
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- akustika řeči * MeSH
- akustika MeSH
- biomechanika MeSH
- hlasové řasy patofyziologie MeSH
- klinická logopedie metody normy MeSH
- konsensus MeSH
- kvalita hlasu * MeSH
- laryngoskopie normy MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- měření tvorby řeči normy MeSH
- odchylka pozorovatele MeSH
- poruchy hlasu diagnóza patofyziologie terapie MeSH
- prediktivní hodnota testů MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- stroboskopie normy MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- konsensus - konference MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
- směrnice pro lékařskou praxi MeSH
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to recommend protocols for instrumental assessment of voice production in the areas of laryngeal endoscopic imaging, acoustic analyses, and aerodynamic procedures, which will (a) improve the evidence for voice assessment measures, (b) enable valid comparisons of assessment results within and across clients and facilities, and (c) facilitate the evaluation of treatment efficacy. METHOD: Existing evidence was combined with expert consensus in areas with a lack of evidence. In addition, a survey of clinicians and a peer review of an initial version of the protocol via VoiceServe and the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association's Special Interest Group 3 (Voice and Voice Disorders) Community were used to create the recommendations for the final protocols. RESULTS: The protocols include recommendations regarding technical specifications for data acquisition, voice and speech tasks, analysis methods, and reporting of results for instrumental evaluation of voice production in the areas of laryngeal endoscopic imaging, acoustics, and aerodynamics. CONCLUSION: The recommended protocols for instrumental assessment of voice using laryngeal endoscopic imaging, acoustic, and aerodynamic methods will enable clinicians and researchers to collect a uniform set of valid and reliable measures that can be compared across assessments, clients, and facilities.
Department of Audiology and Speech Language Pathology Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania
Department of Biophysics Faculty of Science Palacký University Olomouc Czech Republic
Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders Michigan State University East Lansing
Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences Indiana University Bloomington
Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences University of Washington Seattle
Division of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery University of Utah Salt Lake City
Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School MGH Institute of Health Professions Boston
Otolaryngology The Mount Sinai Hospital New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org