Recommended Protocols for Instrumental Assessment of Voice: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Expert Panel to Develop a Protocol for Instrumental Assessment of Vocal Function
Language English Country United States Media print
Document type Consensus Development Conference, Journal Article, Practice Guideline, Review
PubMed
29955816
DOI
10.1044/2018_ajslp-17-0009
PII: 2686671
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Speech Acoustics * MeSH
- Acoustics MeSH
- Biomechanical Phenomena MeSH
- Vocal Cords physiopathology MeSH
- Speech-Language Pathology methods standards MeSH
- Consensus MeSH
- Voice Quality * MeSH
- Laryngoscopy standards MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Speech Production Measurement standards MeSH
- Observer Variation MeSH
- Voice Disorders diagnosis physiopathology therapy MeSH
- Predictive Value of Tests MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- Stroboscopy standards MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Consensus Development Conference MeSH
- Review MeSH
- Practice Guideline MeSH
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to recommend protocols for instrumental assessment of voice production in the areas of laryngeal endoscopic imaging, acoustic analyses, and aerodynamic procedures, which will (a) improve the evidence for voice assessment measures, (b) enable valid comparisons of assessment results within and across clients and facilities, and (c) facilitate the evaluation of treatment efficacy. METHOD: Existing evidence was combined with expert consensus in areas with a lack of evidence. In addition, a survey of clinicians and a peer review of an initial version of the protocol via VoiceServe and the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association's Special Interest Group 3 (Voice and Voice Disorders) Community were used to create the recommendations for the final protocols. RESULTS: The protocols include recommendations regarding technical specifications for data acquisition, voice and speech tasks, analysis methods, and reporting of results for instrumental evaluation of voice production in the areas of laryngeal endoscopic imaging, acoustics, and aerodynamics. CONCLUSION: The recommended protocols for instrumental assessment of voice using laryngeal endoscopic imaging, acoustic, and aerodynamic methods will enable clinicians and researchers to collect a uniform set of valid and reliable measures that can be compared across assessments, clients, and facilities.
Department of Audiology and Speech Language Pathology Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania
Department of Biophysics Faculty of Science Palacký University Olomouc Czech Republic
Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders Michigan State University East Lansing
Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences Indiana University Bloomington
Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences University of Washington Seattle
Division of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery University of Utah Salt Lake City
Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School MGH Institute of Health Professions Boston
Otolaryngology The Mount Sinai Hospital New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai
References provided by Crossref.org