Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) is a novel, non-invasive, and promising treatment option for ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). It has been applied in highly selected patients mainly as bailout procedure, when (multiple) catheter ablations, together with anti-arrhythmic drugs, were unable to control the VAs. Despite the increasing clinical use, there is still limited knowledge of the acute and long-term response of normal and diseased myocardium to STAR. Acute toxicity appeared to be reasonably low, but potential late adverse effects may be underreported. Among published studies, the provided methodological information is often limited, and patient selection, target volume definition, methods for determination and transfer of target volume, and techniques for treatment planning and execution differ across studies, hampering the pooling of data and comparison across studies. In addition, STAR requires close and new collaboration between clinical electrophysiologists and radiation oncologists, which is facilitated by shared knowledge in each collaborator's area of expertise and a common language. This clinical consensus statement provides uniform definition of cardiac target volumes. It aims to provide advice in patient selection for STAR including aetiology-specific aspects and advice in optimal cardiac target volume identification based on available evidence. Safety concerns and the advice for acute and long-term monitoring including the importance of standardized reporting and follow-up are covered by this document. Areas of uncertainty are listed, which require high-quality, reliable pre-clinical and clinical evidence before the expansion of STAR beyond clinical scenarios in which proven therapies are ineffective or unavailable.

• Keywords
• Ablation, Radiotherapy, Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR), Sudden death, Ventricular tachycardia,
• MeSH
• Action Potentials MeSH
• Cardiology * standards   MeSH
• Tachycardia, Ventricular * physiopathology   surgery   diagnosis   MeSH
• Consensus MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Radiosurgery * adverse effects   standards   methods   MeSH
• Risk Factors MeSH
• Patient Selection * MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Practice Guideline MeSH
• Geographicals
• Europe MeSH

Epicardial access during electrophysiology procedures offers valuable insights and therapeutic options for managing ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). The current clinical consensus statement on epicardial VA ablation aims to provide clinicians with a comprehensive understanding of this complex clinical scenario. It offers structured advice and a systematic approach to patient management. Specific sections are devoted to anatomical considerations, criteria for epicardial access and mapping evaluation, methods of epicardial access, management of complications, training, and institutional requirements for epicardial VA ablation. This consensus is a joint effort of collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, including the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society, and the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society.

• Keywords
• Cardiomyopathies, Catheter ablation, Clinical consensus statement, Electrophysiology procedures, Epicardial access, Ventricular arrhythmias, Ventricular fibrillation, Ventricular tachycardia,
• MeSH
• Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac * standards   MeSH
• Epicardial Mapping * standards   MeSH
• Cardiology * standards   MeSH
• Catheter Ablation * standards   adverse effects   methods   MeSH
• Tachycardia, Ventricular * surgery   diagnosis   physiopathology   MeSH
• Consensus MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Pericardium * surgery   physiopathology   MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Practice Guideline MeSH
• Geographicals
• Europe MeSH

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are an increasingly used strategy for the management of patients with advanced heart failure. Although these devices effectively improve survival, atrial and ventricular arrhythmias are common with a prevalence of 20-50% at one year after LVAD implantation. Arrhythmias predispose these patients to additional risk and are associated with considerable morbidity from recurrent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks, progressive failure of the unsupported right ventricle, and herald an increased risk of mortality. Management of patients with arrhythmias and LVAD differs in many aspects from the general population heart failure patients. These include ruling out the reversible causes of arrhythmias that in LVAD patients may include mechanical irritation from the inflow cannula and suction events. For patients with symptomatic arrhythmias refractory to medical treatment, catheter ablation might be relevant. There are specific technical and procedural challenges perceived to be unique to LVAD-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation such as vascular and LV access, signal filtering, catheter manoeuvrability within decompressed chambers, and electroanatomic mapping system interference. In some patients, the arrhythmogenic substrate might not be readily accessible by catheter ablation after LVAD implantation. In this regard, the peri-implantation period offers a unique opportunity to surgically address arrhythmogenic substrate and suppress future VT recurrences. This document aims to address specific aspects of the management of arrhythmias in LVAD patients focusing on anti-arrhythmic drug therapy and ablations.

• Keywords
• Atrial fibrillation, Catheter ablation, Heart failure, Left ventricular assist device, Ventricular arrhythmia,
• MeSH
• Anti-Arrhythmia Agents * therapeutic use   MeSH
• Ventricular Function, Left MeSH
• Catheter Ablation * methods   MeSH
• Tachycardia, Ventricular therapy   surgery   physiopathology   MeSH
• Consensus MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Heart-Assist Devices * MeSH
• Risk Factors MeSH
• Arrhythmias, Cardiac * therapy   physiopathology   diagnosis   MeSH
• Heart Failure * therapy   physiopathology   MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Practice Guideline MeSH
• Geographicals
• Europe MeSH
• Names of Substances
• Anti-Arrhythmia Agents * MeSH

BACKGROUND: Part of the current stereotactic arrythmia radioablation (STAR) workflow is transfer of findings from the electroanatomic mapping (EAM) to computed tomography (CT). Here, we analyzed inter- and intraobserver variation in a modified EAM-CT registration using automatic registration algorithms designed to yield higher robustness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This work is based on data of 10 patients who had previously undergone STAR. Two observers participated in this study: (1) an electrophysiologist technician (cardiology) with substatial experience in EAM-CT merge, and (2) a clinical engineer (radiotherapy) with minimum experience with EAM-CT merge. EAM-CT merge consists of 3 main steps: segmentation of left ventricle from CT (CT LV), registration of the CT LV and EAM, clinical target volume (CTV) delineation from EAM specific points. Mean Hausdorff distance (MHD), Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and absolute difference in Center of Gravity (CoG) were used to assess intra/interobserver variability. RESULTS: Intraobserver variability: The mean DSC and MHD for 3 CT LVs altogether was 0.92 ± 0.01 and 1.49 ± 0.23 mm. The mean DSC and MHD for 3 CTVs altogether was 0,82 ± 0,06 and 0,71 ± 0,22 mm. Interobserver variability: Segmented CT LVs showed great similarity (mean DSC of 0,91 ± 0,01, MHD of 1,86 ± 0,47 mm). The mean DSC comparing CTVs from both observers was 0,81 ± 0,11 and MHD was 0,87 ± 0,45 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The high interobserver similarity of segmented LVs and delineated CTVs confirmed the robustness of the proposed method. Even an inexperienced user can perform a precise EAM-CT merge following workflow instructions.

• Keywords
• interobserver, intraobserver, radioablation, target delineation, ventricular tachycardia,
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH

Electrical storm (ES) is a state of electrical instability, manifesting as recurrent ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) over a short period of time (three or more episodes of sustained VA within 24 h, separated by at least 5 min, requiring termination by an intervention). The clinical presentation can vary, but ES is usually a cardiac emergency. Electrical storm mainly affects patients with structural or primary electrical heart disease, often with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Management of ES requires a multi-faceted approach and the involvement of multi-disciplinary teams, but despite advanced treatment and often invasive procedures, it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. With an ageing population, longer survival of heart failure patients, and an increasing number of patients with ICD, the incidence of ES is expected to increase. This European Heart Rhythm Association clinical consensus statement focuses on pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and acute and long-term management of patients presenting with ES or clustered VA.

• Keywords
• Arrhythmia, Consensus document, Electrical storm, Sudden cardiac death, Ventricular fibrillation, Ventricular tachycardia,
• MeSH
• Defibrillators, Implantable * MeSH
• Incidence MeSH
• Tachycardia, Ventricular * diagnosis   therapy   complications   MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Risk Factors MeSH
• Arrhythmias, Cardiac diagnosis   therapy   MeSH
• Heart Failure * complications   MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Geographicals
• Asia epidemiology   MeSH

• Keywords
• Aortic valve replacement, Bipolar ablation, Ethanol ablation, Left ventricular summit, Stereotactic radiotherapy, Ventricular tachycardia,
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Case Reports MeSH

[Figure: see text]

• Keywords
• Mitral annular disjunction, Mitral valve prolapse, Risk stratification‌, Sudden cardiac death, Ventricular arrhythmia,
• MeSH
• Consensus MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Mitral Valve diagnostic imaging   MeSH
• Heart Valve Diseases * MeSH
• Mitral Valve Prolapse * complications   diagnostic imaging   MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Geographicals
• Latin America MeSH

The electrophysiology-guided noninvasive cardiac radioablation, also known as STAR (stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation) is an emerging treatment method for persistent ventricular tachycardia. Since its first application in 2012 in Stanford Cancer Institute, and a year later in University Hospital Ostrava, Czech Republic, the authors from all around the world have published case reports and case series, and several prospective trials were established. In this article, we would like to discuss the available clinical evidence, analyze the potentially clinically relevant differences in methodology, and address some of the unique challenges that come with this treatment method.

• Keywords
• ablation, noninvasive, radiosurgery, stereotactic body radiation therapy, substrate ablation, ventricular tachycardia,
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Review MeSH

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged recently as a novel therapeutic alternative for patients with ventricular tachycardias (VTs) resistant to convetional treatment. Nevertheless, many aspects related to SBRT are currently unknown. CASE SUMMARY: A 66-year-old man with ischaemic heart disease, a history of coronary artery bypass graft surgery and left ventricular dysfunction was referred for recurrent symptomatic episodes of slow VT (108 b.p.m.). The arrhythmia was resistant to antiarrhythmic drug therapy with amiodarone and repeated catheter ablation. The patient was scheduled to SBRT, however, the first session failed to suppress VT recurrences. After 20 months, the patient underwent re-do ablation procedure that revealed a newly developed scar with its core adjacent to the presumed critical part of the VT substrate. Catheter ablation again failed to eliminate VT and the second session of SBRT was scheduled. To improve targeting of the VT substrate for SBRT, we applied our recently developed original method for integration of data from the electroanatomical mapping system with computer tomography images. The second session of SBRT with precise targeting using the novel strategy led within 3 months to the successful elimination of VT. DISCUSSION: This case report describes a patient in whom the recurrent VT was abolished only by properly targeted SBRT. Above all, the case highlights the importance of precise identification and targeting for SBRT. Our case also documents in vivo, by electroanatomical voltage mapping, the development of SBRT-related myocardial lesion. This represents an important mechanistic proof of the concept of SBRT.

• Keywords
• Case report, Catheter ablation, Stereotactic radiotherapy, Ventricular tachycardia,
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH