Most cited article - PubMed ID 31673410
Imputing missing data of function and disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis registers: what is the best technique?
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare various methods for imputing disease activity in longitudinally collected observational data of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). METHODS: We conducted a simulation study on data from 8583 axSpA patients from ten European registries. Disease activity was assessed by the Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) and the corresponding low disease activity (LDA; ASDAS<2.1) state at baseline, 6 and 12 months. We focused on cross-sectional methods which impute missing values of an individual at a particular time point based on the available information from other individuals at that time point. We applied nine single and five multiple imputation methods, covering mean, regression and hot deck methods. The performance of each imputation method was evaluated via relative bias and coverage of 95% confidence intervals for the mean ASDAS and the derived proportion of patients in LDA. RESULTS: Hot deck imputation methods outperformed mean and regression methods, particularly when assessing LDA. Multiple imputation procedures provided better coverage than the corresponding single imputation ones. However, none of the evaluated methods produced unbiased estimates with adequate coverage across all time points, with performance for missing baseline data being worse than for missing follow-up data. Predictive mean and weighted predictive mean hot deck imputation procedures consistently provided results with low bias. CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to the available methods for imputing disease activity in observational research. Hot deck imputation using predictive mean matching exhibited the highest robustness and is thus our suggested approach.
- Keywords
- Axial Spondyloarthritis, Epidemiology, Interleukin-17, Tumour Necrosis Factor Inhibitors,
- MeSH
- Axial Spondyloarthritis * epidemiology diagnosis MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Observational Studies as Topic * MeSH
- Cross-Sectional Studies MeSH
- Registries MeSH
- Spondylarthritis * diagnosis MeSH
- Severity of Illness Index MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe epidemiology MeSH
BACKGROUND: JAK-inhibitors (JAKi), recently approved in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), have changed the landscape of treatment choices. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of four current second-line therapies of RA with different modes of action, since JAKi approval, in an international collaboration of 19 registers. METHODS: In this observational cohort study, patients initiating tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), interleukin-6 inhibitors (IL-6i), abatacept (ABA) or JAKi were included. We compared the effectiveness of these treatments in terms of drug discontinuation and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) response rates at 1 year. Analyses were adjusted for patient, disease and treatment characteristics, including lines of therapy and accounted for competing risk. RESULTS: We included 31 846 treatment courses: 17 522 TNFi, 2775 ABA, 3863 IL-6i and 7686 JAKi. Adjusted analyses of overall discontinuation were similar across all treatments. The main single reason of stopping treatment was ineffectiveness. Compared with TNFi, JAKi were less often discontinued for ineffectiveness (adjusted HR (aHR) 0.75, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.83), as was IL-6i (aHR 0.76, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.85) and more often for adverse events (aHR 1.16, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.33). Adjusted CDAI response rates at 1 year were similar between TNFi, JAKi and IL-6i and slightly lower for ABA. CONCLUSION: The adjusted overall drug discontinuation and 1 year response rates of JAKi and IL-6i were similar to those observed with TNFi. Compared with TNFi, JAKi were more often discontinued for adverse events and less for ineffectiveness, as were IL-6i.
- Keywords
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Biological Therapy, Epidemiology, Therapeutics, Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors,
- MeSH
- Abatacept therapeutic use MeSH
- Antirheumatic Agents * therapeutic use MeSH
- Janus Kinase Inhibitors * therapeutic use MeSH
- Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors MeSH
- Interleukin-6 MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid * chemically induced drug therapy MeSH
- Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Observational Study MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Abatacept MeSH
- Antirheumatic Agents * MeSH
- Janus Kinase Inhibitors * MeSH
- Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors MeSH
- Interleukin-6 MeSH
- Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha MeSH