Most cited article - PubMed ID 37058595
Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Ipilimumab in Resected Stage III/IV Melanoma: 5-Year Efficacy and Biomarker Results from CheckMate 238
PURPOSE: In phase III CheckMate 238, adjuvant nivolumab significantly improved recurrence-free survival compared with ipilimumab in patients with resected stage IIIB-C/IV melanoma without a significant difference in overall survival (OS). Here, we investigate progression-free survival (PFS) and OS after postrecurrence systemic therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients 15 years or older with resected stage IIIB-C/IV melanoma were stratified by stage and tumor PD-L1 status and randomly assigned to receive nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, or ipilimumab 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses and then every 12 weeks for 1 year or until disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Patients with recurrence in each group were assessed for PFS and OS from subsequent systemic therapy (SST) initiation per recurrence timing (≤12 months [early] v >12 months [late] from initial therapy). RESULTS: Recurrences occurred in 198 (44%) of 453 nivolumab-treated patients (122 early, 76 late) and 232 (51%) of 453 ipilimumab-treated patients (160 early, 72 late). Median PFS on next-line systemic therapy for nivolumab-treated patients recurring early versus late was 4.7 versus 12.4 months (24-month rates, 16% v 31%); median OS was 19.8 versus 42.8 months (24-month rates: 37% v 73%). In response to subsequent therapy, patients on nivolumab with late versus early recurrence were more likely to benefit from anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Nivolumab-treated patients with either an early or late recurrence benefitted from an ipilimumab-based therapy or targeted therapy, each with similar OS. CONCLUSION: Postrecurrence survival was longer for patients who recurred >12 months. Patients on nivolumab who recurred early benefitted from SST but had better survival with ipilimumab-based regimens or targeted therapy compared with anti-PD-1 monotherapy.
- MeSH
- Chemotherapy, Adjuvant MeSH
- Progression-Free Survival MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors * therapeutic use adverse effects MeSH
- Ipilimumab * therapeutic use administration & dosage MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local * drug therapy MeSH
- Melanoma * drug therapy mortality pathology MeSH
- Skin Neoplasms drug therapy pathology mortality MeSH
- Nivolumab * therapeutic use MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Neoplasm Staging MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Clinical Trial, Phase III MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors * MeSH
- Ipilimumab * MeSH
- Nivolumab * MeSH
BACKGROUND: Melanoma is the most aggressive skin cancer with ability to recur also after early-stage tumor surgery. The aim was to identify early-stage melanoma patients at high risk of recurrence using liquid biopsy, estimating of mutated BRAF ctDNA and the level of tumor marker S100B in plasma. METHODS: Eighty patients were enrolled in the study. BRAF V600E mutation was determined in FFPE tissue and plasma samples using ultrasensitive ddPCR with pre-amplification. The level of S100B was determined in plasma by immunoassay chemiluminescent method. RESULTS: The best prediction of melanoma recurrence after surgery was observed in patients with combined high level of S100B (S100Bhigh) and ctDNA BRAFV600E (BRAFmut) in preoperative (57.1% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.025) as well as postoperative blood samples (83.3% vs. 14.3%, resp., p = 0.001) in comparison with low S100B and BRAF wild-type. Similarly, patients with preoperative and postoperative S100Bhigh and BRAFmut experienced worse prognosis (DFI p = 0.05, OS p = 0.131 and DFI p = 0.001, OS = 0.001, resp.). CONCLUSION: We observed the benefit of the estimation of combination of S100B and ctDNA BRAFmut in peripheral blood for identification of patients at high risk of recurrence and unfavorable prognosis. SIGNIFICANCE: There is still no general consensus on molecular markers for deciding the appropriateness of adjuvant treatment of early-stage melanoma. We have shown for the first time that the combined determination of the ctDNA BRAFmut oncogene (liquid biopsy) and the high level of tumor marker S100B in pre- and postoperative plasma samples can identify patients with the worst prognosis and the highest risk of tumor recurrence. Therefore, modern adjuvant therapy would be appropriate for these patients with resectable melanoma, regardless of disease stage.
- Keywords
- BRAF V600E, S100B, ctDNA, ddPCR, melanoma,
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local * genetics blood MeSH
- Melanoma * genetics blood pathology diagnosis surgery MeSH
- Mutation * MeSH
- Biomarkers, Tumor * blood genetics MeSH
- Skin Neoplasms * blood genetics pathology diagnosis surgery MeSH
- Predictive Value of Tests MeSH
- Prognosis MeSH
- Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf * genetics blood MeSH
- S100 Calcium Binding Protein beta Subunit * blood genetics MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Neoplasm Staging MeSH
- Liquid Biopsy methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Names of Substances
- BRAF protein, human MeSH Browser
- Biomarkers, Tumor * MeSH
- Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf * MeSH
- S100 Calcium Binding Protein beta Subunit * MeSH
- S100B protein, human MeSH Browser
Patients with resected stage IIB/C melanoma have high recurrence risk, similar to those with resected stage IIIA/B disease. The phase 3, double-blind CheckMate 76K trial assessed 790 patients with resected stage IIB/C melanoma randomized 2:1 (stratified by tumor category) to nivolumab 480 mg or placebo every 4 weeks for 12 months. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed recurrence-free survival (RFS). Secondary endpoints included distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and safety. At 7.8 months of minimum follow-up, nivolumab significantly improved RFS versus placebo (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.42; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.30-0.59; P < 0.0001), with 12-month RFS of 89.0% versus 79.4% and benefit observed across subgroups; DMFS was also improved (HR = 0.47; 95% CI: 0.30-0.72). Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 10.3% (nivolumab) and 2.3% (placebo) of patients. One treatment-related death (0.2%) occurred with nivolumab. Nivolumab is an effective and generally well-tolerated adjuvant treatment in patients with resected stage IIB/C melanoma. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04099251 .
- MeSH
- Adjuvants, Immunologic MeSH
- Double-Blind Method MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant MeSH
- Melanoma * drug therapy surgery MeSH
- Skin Neoplasms * drug therapy surgery MeSH
- Nivolumab MeSH
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects MeSH
- Neoplasm Staging MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Clinical Trial, Phase III MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Adjuvants, Immunologic MeSH
- Nivolumab MeSH