Despite the well-established adverse impact of del(11q) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), the prognostic significance of somatic ATM mutations remains uncertain. We evaluated the effects of ATM aberrations (del(11q) and/or ATM mutations) on time-to-first-treatment (TTFT) in 3631 untreated patients with CLL, in the context of IGHV gene mutational status and mutations in nine CLL-related genes. ATM mutations were present in 246 cases (6.8%), frequently co-occurring with del(11q) (112/246 cases, 45.5%). ATM-mutated patients displayed a different spectrum of genetic abnormalities when comparing IGHV-mutated (M-CLL) and unmutated (U-CLL) cases: M-CLL was enriched for SF3B1 and NFKBIE mutations, whereas U-CLL showed mutual exclusivity with trisomy 12 and TP53 mutations. Isolated ATM mutations were rare, affecting 1.2% of Binet A patients and <1% of M-CLL cases. While univariable analysis revealed shorter TTFT for Binet A patients with any ATM aberration compared to ATM-wildtype, multivariable analysis identified only del(11q), trisomy 12, SF3B1, and EGR2 mutations as independent prognosticators of shorter TTFT among Binet A patients and within M-CLL and U-CLL subgroups. These findings highlight del(11q), and not ATM mutations, as a key biomarker of increased risk of early progression and need for therapy, particularly in otherwise indolent M-CLL, providing insights into risk-stratification and therapeutic decision-making.

• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH

Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) exhibit diverse clinical outcomes. An expanding array of genetic tests is now employed to facilitate the identification of patients with high-risk disease and inform treatment decisions. These tests encompass molecular cytogenetic analysis, focusing on recurrent chromosomal alterations, particularly del(17p). Additionally, sequencing is utilized to identify TP53 mutations and to determine the somatic hypermutation status of the immunoglobulin heavy variable gene. Concurrently, a swift advancement of targeted treatment has led to the implementation of novel strategies for patients with CLL, including kinase and BCL2 inhibitors. This review explores both current and emerging diagnostic tests aimed at identifying high-risk patients who should benefit from targeted therapies. We outline existing treatment paradigms, emphasizing the importance of matching the right treatment to the right patient beyond genetic stratification, considering the crucial balance between safety and efficacy. We also take into consideration the practical and logistical issues when choosing a management strategy for each individual patient. Furthermore, we delve into the mechanisms underlying therapy resistance and stress the relevance of monitoring measurable residual disease to guide treatment decisions. Finally, we underscore the necessity of aggregating real-world data, adopting a global perspective, and ensuring patient engagement. Taken together, we argue that precision medicine is not the mere application of precision diagnostics and accessibility of precision therapies in CLL but encompasses various aspects of the patient journey (e.g., lifestyle exposures and comorbidities) and their preferences toward achieving true personalized medicine for patients with CLL.

• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Review MeSH