Chromosomal rearrangements are fundamental evolutionary drivers leading to genomic diversification. African clawed frogs (genus Xenopus, subgenera Silurana and Xenopus) represent an allopolyploid model system with conserved chromosome numbers in species with the same ploidy within each subgenus. Two significant interchromosomal rearrangements have been identified: a translocation between chromosomes 9 and 2, found in subgenus Silurana, and a fusion between chromosomes 9 and 10, probably widespread in subgenus Xenopus. Here, we study the allotetraploid Xenopus pygmaeus (subgenus Xenopus) based on in-depth karyotype analysis using chromosome measurements and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). We designed FISH probes for genes associated with translocation and fusion to test for the presence of the two main types of rearrangements. We also examined the locations of 5S and 28S ribosomal tandem repeats, with the former often associated with telomeric regions and the latter with nucleolus organizer regions (NORs). The translocation-associated gene mapping did not detect the translocation in X. pygmaeus, supporting the hypothesis that the translocation is restricted to Silurana, but instead identified a pericentromeric inversion on chromosome 2S. The fusion-associated gene mapping confirmed the fusion of chromosomes 9 and 10, supporting this fusion as an ancestral state in subgenus Xenopus. As expected, the 5S repeats were found predominantly in telomere regions on almost all chromosomes. The nucleolar 28S repeats were localized on chromosome 6S, a position previously found only in the closely related species X. parafraseri, whereas other, phylogenetically more distant species have NORs located on different chromosomes. We therefore hypothesize that a jumping mechanism could explain the relatively frequent changes in the location of NORs during Xenopus evolution.

• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH

INTRODUCTION: Comparative cytogenetics is a vital approach for diagnosing chromosome abnormalities and identifying species-specific patterns. In this study, chromosomal analysis of three Anatolian endemic Cobitis species was performed: Cobitis bilseli, C. fahireae, and C. turcica. METHODS: Conventional cytogenetic techniques such as Giemsa staining, C-banding, and Ag-NOR staining were applied, followed by measurements of chromosome arm lengths including analysis of the measured data. RESULTS: The diploid chromosome number, 2n = 50, was determined for all three species. The karyotype formulas were as follows: four pairs of metacentric, 5 pairs of submetacentric, and 16 pairs of subtelo-telocentric chromosomes in C. bilseli; 11 pairs of metacentric, 7 pairs of submetacentric, and 7 pairs of subtelo-telocentric chromosomes in C. fahireae; and 4 pairs of metacentric, 4 pairs of submetacentric, and 17 pairs of subtelo-telocentric chromosomes in C. turcica. Dark C-bands were observed on the pericentromeres of nearly all chromosomes in C. bilseli and C. turcica, whereas light C-bands appeared on the pericentromeres of some chromosomes in C. fahireae. Silver-stained metaphases revealed signals on the short arm of a submetacentric chromosome pair in C. fahireae (each homologous chromosome carries one signal), while in C. bilseli and C. turcica, Ag-NOR signals were detected on the long arm of a single metacentric chromosome (only one homologous chromosome carries the signal, and the signal-carrying chromosome is the largest chromosome in the karyotype). CONCLUSION: This study provides new cytogenetic data consistent with the phylogenetic distances between the studied species, indicating that pericentric inversions and/or translocations govern the formation of Cobitis karyotypes. INTRODUCTION: Comparative cytogenetics is a vital approach for diagnosing chromosome abnormalities and identifying species-specific patterns. In this study, chromosomal analysis of three Anatolian endemic Cobitis species was performed: Cobitis bilseli, C. fahireae, and C. turcica. METHODS: Conventional cytogenetic techniques such as Giemsa staining, C-banding, and Ag-NOR staining were applied, followed by measurements of chromosome arm lengths including analysis of the measured data. RESULTS: The diploid chromosome number, 2n = 50, was determined for all three species. The karyotype formulas were as follows: four pairs of metacentric, 5 pairs of submetacentric, and 16 pairs of subtelo-telocentric chromosomes in C. bilseli; 11 pairs of metacentric, 7 pairs of submetacentric, and 7 pairs of subtelo-telocentric chromosomes in C. fahireae; and 4 pairs of metacentric, 4 pairs of submetacentric, and 17 pairs of subtelo-telocentric chromosomes in C. turcica. Dark C-bands were observed on the pericentromeres of nearly all chromosomes in C. bilseli and C. turcica, whereas light C-bands appeared on the pericentromeres of some chromosomes in C. fahireae. Silver-stained metaphases revealed signals on the short arm of a submetacentric chromosome pair in C. fahireae (each homologous chromosome carries one signal), while in C. bilseli and C. turcica, Ag-NOR signals were detected on the long arm of a single metacentric chromosome (only one homologous chromosome carries the signal, and the signal-carrying chromosome is the largest chromosome in the karyotype). CONCLUSION: This study provides new cytogenetic data consistent with the phylogenetic distances between the studied species, indicating that pericentric inversions and/or translocations govern the formation of Cobitis karyotypes.

• Klíčová slova
• Ag-NORs, C-banding, Centromeric index, Fish, Spined loach,
• MeSH
• chromozomy genetika   MeSH
• diploidie MeSH
• druhová specificita MeSH
• karyotyp * MeSH
• karyotypizace * metody   MeSH
• máloostní genetika   MeSH
• pruhování chromozomů * MeSH
• zvířata MeSH
• Check Tag
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• zvířata MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• Geografické názvy
• Turecko MeSH