INTRODUCTION: Comparative cytogenetics is a vital approach for diagnosing chromosome abnormalities and identifying species-specific patterns. In this study, chromosomal analysis of three Anatolian endemic Cobitis species was performed: Cobitis bilseli, C. fahireae, and C. turcica. METHODS: Conventional cytogenetic techniques such as Giemsa staining, C-banding, and Ag-NOR staining were applied, followed by measurements of chromosome arm lengths including analysis of the measured data. RESULTS: The diploid chromosome number, 2n = 50, was determined for all three species. The karyotype formulas were as follows: four pairs of metacentric, 5 pairs of submetacentric, and 16 pairs of subtelo-telocentric chromosomes in C. bilseli; 11 pairs of metacentric, 7 pairs of submetacentric, and 7 pairs of subtelo-telocentric chromosomes in C. fahireae; and 4 pairs of metacentric, 4 pairs of submetacentric, and 17 pairs of subtelo-telocentric chromosomes in C. turcica. Dark C-bands were observed on the pericentromeres of nearly all chromosomes in C. bilseli and C. turcica, whereas light C-bands appeared on the pericentromeres of some chromosomes in C. fahireae. Silver-stained metaphases revealed signals on the short arm of a submetacentric chromosome pair in C. fahireae (each homologous chromosome carries one signal), while in C. bilseli and C. turcica, Ag-NOR signals were detected on the long arm of a single metacentric chromosome (only one homologous chromosome carries the signal, and the signal-carrying chromosome is the largest chromosome in the karyotype). CONCLUSION: This study provides new cytogenetic data consistent with the phylogenetic distances between the studied species, indicating that pericentric inversions and/or translocations govern the formation of Cobitis karyotypes. INTRODUCTION: Comparative cytogenetics is a vital approach for diagnosing chromosome abnormalities and identifying species-specific patterns. In this study, chromosomal analysis of three Anatolian endemic Cobitis species was performed: Cobitis bilseli, C. fahireae, and C. turcica. METHODS: Conventional cytogenetic techniques such as Giemsa staining, C-banding, and Ag-NOR staining were applied, followed by measurements of chromosome arm lengths including analysis of the measured data. RESULTS: The diploid chromosome number, 2n = 50, was determined for all three species. The karyotype formulas were as follows: four pairs of metacentric, 5 pairs of submetacentric, and 16 pairs of subtelo-telocentric chromosomes in C. bilseli; 11 pairs of metacentric, 7 pairs of submetacentric, and 7 pairs of subtelo-telocentric chromosomes in C. fahireae; and 4 pairs of metacentric, 4 pairs of submetacentric, and 17 pairs of subtelo-telocentric chromosomes in C. turcica. Dark C-bands were observed on the pericentromeres of nearly all chromosomes in C. bilseli and C. turcica, whereas light C-bands appeared on the pericentromeres of some chromosomes in C. fahireae. Silver-stained metaphases revealed signals on the short arm of a submetacentric chromosome pair in C. fahireae (each homologous chromosome carries one signal), while in C. bilseli and C. turcica, Ag-NOR signals were detected on the long arm of a single metacentric chromosome (only one homologous chromosome carries the signal, and the signal-carrying chromosome is the largest chromosome in the karyotype). CONCLUSION: This study provides new cytogenetic data consistent with the phylogenetic distances between the studied species, indicating that pericentric inversions and/or translocations govern the formation of Cobitis karyotypes.

Department of Biology McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada

Department of Cell Biology Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Czechia

Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics Faculty of Science and Arts Kirsehir Ahi Evran University Kirsehir Turkey

Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics Faculty of Science Bartin University Bartin Turkey

Department of Nutrition and Dietetics Faculty of Health Sciences Kirsehir Ahi Evran University Kirsehir Turkey

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Vasil’eva ED, Solovyeva EN, Vasil’ev VP. Phylogenetic relationships, taxonomy and diagnostics of spined loaches (Cobitidae:

Freyhof J, BayÇelebİ E, Geiger M. Review of the genus PubMed

Majtánová Z, Choleva L, Symonová R, Ráb P, Kotusz J, Pekárik L, et al. Asexual reproduction does not apparently increase the rate of chromosomal evolution: karyotype stability in diploid and triploid clonal hybrid fish ( PubMed PMC

Boroń A. Banded karyotype of spined loach PubMed

Levan A, Fredga K, Sandberg AA. Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas. 2009;52(2):201–20.

Rábová M, Ráb P, Ozouf-Costaz C. Extensive polymorphism and chromosomal characteristics of ribosomal DNA in a loach fish, PubMed

Fornaini NR, Černohorská H, do Vale Martins L, Knytl M. Cytogenetic analysis of the fish genus PubMed PMC

Gvoždík V, Knytl M, Zassi-Boulou A-G, Fornaini NR, Bergelová B. Tetraploidy in the Boettger’s dwarf clawed frog (Pipidae:

Schubert I. What is behind “centromere repositioning”. Chromosoma. 2018;127(2):229–34. PubMed

Knytl M, Tlapakova T, Vankova T, Krylov V. PubMed

Knytl M, Forsythe A, Kalous L. A fish of multiple faces, which show us enigmatic and incredible phenomena in nature: biology and cytogenetics of the genus PubMed PMC

Song X-Y, Furman BLS, Premachandra T, Knytl M, Cauret CMS, Wasonga DV, et al. Sex chromosome degeneration, turnover, and sex-biased expression of sex-linked transcripts in African clawed frogs ( PubMed PMC

Evans BJ, Mudd AB, Bredeson JV, Furman BLS, Wasonga DV, Lyons JB, et al. New insights into PubMed PMC

Eagderi S, Secer B, Freyhof J. PubMed

Değer D. The karyological investigations of some types from Cobitoidea from river system Tigris and Euphrates; 2011.

Ayata MK, Unal S, Gaffaroğlu M. Chromosomal analyses of

Doori ASJ, Arslan A. Karyological analysis of endemic loach

Bertollo LAC, Cioffi MB, Moreira-Filho O. Direct chromosome preparation from freshwater teleost fishes. In: Ozouf-Costaz C, Pisano E, Foresti F, de Almeida Toledo LF, eds. Fish cytogenetic techniques: ray-fin fishes and chondrichthyans. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2015. p. 21–6.

Sumner AT. A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Exp Cell Res. 1972;75(1):304–6. PubMed

Howell WM, Black DA. Controlled silver-staining of nucleolus organizer regions with a protective colloidal developer: a 1-step method. Experientia. 1980;36(8):1014–5. PubMed

Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):671–5. PubMed PMC

Knytl M, Fornaini NR. Measurement of chromosomal arms and FISH reveal complex genome architecture and standardized karyotype of model fish, genus PubMed PMC

Knytl M, Fornaini NR, Bergelová B, Gvoždík V, Černohorská H, Kubíčková S, et al. Divergent subgenome evolution in the allotetraploid frog PubMed

R Core Team . R: a Language and environment for statistical computing; 2020. Available from: https://www.r-project.org/

Sember A, Bohlen J, Šlechtová V, Altmanová M, Pelikánová Š, Ráb P. Dynamics of tandemly repeated DNA sequences during evolution of diploid and tetraploid botiid loaches (Teleostei: Cobitoidea: Botiidae). PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0195054. PubMed PMC

Sember A, Pelikánová Š, de Bello Cioffi M, Šlechtová V, Hatanaka T, Do Doan H, et al. Taxonomic diversity not associated with gross karyotype differentiation: the case of bighead carps, genus PubMed PMC

Krysanov EY, Nagy B, Watters BR, Sember A, Simanovsky SA. Karyotype differentiation in the PubMed PMC

Ráb P, Hnátková E, Majtánová Z, Šlechtová VB, Bohlen J. Karyotype record for the morphologically derived, rarely collected, freshwater fish

Madeira JM, Collares-Pereira MJ, Elvira B. Cytotaxonomy of Iberian loaches with some remarks on the karyological evolution of both families (Pisces, Cobitidae, Homalopteridae). Caryologia. 1992;45(3–4):273–81.

Janko K, Vasil’ev VP, Ráb P, Rábová M, Šlechtová V, Vasil’eva ED. Genetic and morphological analyses of 50-chromosome spined loaches (

Vasil’ev VP, Vasil’eva ED. Comparative karyological analysis of mud loach and spined loach species (genera

Esmaeili HR, Pirvar Z, Ebrahimi M, F Geiger M. Karyological and molecular analysis of three endemic loaches (Actinopterygii: cobitoidea) from Kor River basin, Iran. Mol Biol Res Commun. 2015;4(1):1–13. PubMed PMC

Hnátková E, Triantaphyllidis C, Ozouf-Costaz C, Choleva L, Majtánová Z, Bohlen J, et al. Karyotype and chromosomal characteristics of rDNA of PubMed PMC

Vasil’eva ED, Solovyeva EN, Levin BA, Vasil’ev VP.

Marta A, Dedukh D, Bartoš O, Majtánová Z, Janko K. Cytogenetic characterization of seven novel satDNA markers in two species of spined loaches ( PubMed PMC

Knytl M, Kalous L, Rylková K, Choleva L, Merilä J, Ráb P. Morphologically indistinguishable hybrid PubMed PMC

Symonová R, Howell WM. Vertebrate genome evolution in the light of fish cytogenomics and rDNAomics. Genes. 2018;9(2):96–27. PubMed PMC

Perdices A, Ozeren CS, Erkakan F, Freyhof J. Diversity of spined loaches from Asia Minor in a phylogenetic context (Teleostei: Cobitidae). PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0205678. PubMed PMC

Schmid M. Chromosome banding in Amphibia. Chromosoma. 1982;87(3):327–44.

Dias S, Souza RC, Vasconcelos EV, Vasconcelos S, da Silva Oliveira AR, do Vale Martins L, et al. Cytomolecular diversity among V PubMed

Dobigny G, Ozouf-Costaz C, Bonillo C, Volobouev V. “Ag-NORs” are not always true NORs: new evidence in mammals. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2002;98(1):75–7. PubMed

Knytl M, Kalous L, Rab P. Karyotype and chromosome banding of endangered crucian carp, PubMed PMC

FISH mapping in Xenopus pygmaeus refines understanding of genomic rearrangements and reveals jumping NORs in African clawed frogs