Osteoporosis is a chronic disease with high unmet medical need. It is characterized by low bone mass and deteriorated bone architecture, leading to increased risk of fragility fractures, with vertebral and hip fractures representing the highest risk of morbidity and mortality. The baseline therapeutic approach to osteoporosis treatment has been based on adequate intake of calcium and supplementation of vitamin D. In this review, we focus on two approved monoclonal antibodies, romosozumab and denosumab, which have been shown to be efficient and safe options to prevent patient fractures. Romosozumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody IgG2 isotype that extracellularly binds sclerostin with high affinity and specificity. Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody IgG2 isotype that binds RANK ligand (RANKL) and prevents the interaction of RANKL with its receptor RANK. Denosumab is an antiresorptive that has been used for more than a decade, and romosozumab has recently been approved for clinical practice worldwide.

• Klíčová slova
• Bone disorders, Denosumab, Metabolic diseases, Osteoporosis, Romosozumab,
• MeSH
• denosumab * terapeutické užití   MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky * terapeutické užití   MeSH
• imunoglobulin G MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• osteoporóza * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• přehledy MeSH
• Názvy látek
• denosumab * MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky * MeSH
• imunoglobulin G MeSH
• romosozumab MeSH Prohlížeč

BACKGROUND: Previous bisphosphonate treatment attenuates the bone-forming effect of teriparatide. We compared the effects of 12 months of romosozumab (AMG 785), a sclerostin monoclonal antibody, versus teriparatide on bone mineral density (BMD) in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis transitioning from bisphosphonate therapy. METHODS: This randomised, phase 3, open-label, active-controlled study was done at 46 sites in North America, Latin America, and Europe. We enrolled women (aged ≥55 to ≤90 years) with postmenopausal osteoporosis who had taken an oral bisphosphonate for at least 3 years before screening and alendronate the year before screening; an areal BMD T score of -2·5 or lower at the total hip, femoral neck, or lumbar spine; and a history of fracture. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive voice response system to receive subcutaneous romosozumab (210 mg once monthly) or subcutaneous teriparatide (20 μg once daily). The primary endpoint was percentage change from baseline in areal BMD by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at the total hip through month 12 (mean of months 6 and 12), which used a linear mixed effects model for repeated measures and represented the mean treatment effect at months 6 and 12. All randomised patients with a baseline measurement and at least one post-baseline measurement were included in the efficacy analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01796301. FINDINGS: Between Jan 31, 2013, and April 29, 2014, 436 patients were randomly assigned to romosozumab (n=218) or teriparatide (n=218). 206 patients in the romosozumab group and 209 in the teriparatide group were included in the primary efficacy analysis. Through 12 months, the mean percentage change from baseline in total hip areal BMD was 2·6% (95% CI 2·2 to 3·0) in the romosozumab group and -0·6% (-1·0 to -0·2) in the teriparatide group; difference 3·2% (95% CI 2·7 to 3·8; p<0·0001). The frequency of adverse events was generally balanced between treatment groups. The most frequently reported adverse events were nasopharyngitis (28 [13%] of 218 in the romosozumab group vs 22 [10%] of 214 in the teriparatide group), hypercalcaemia (two [<1%] vs 22 [10%]), and arthralgia (22 [10%] vs 13 [6%]). Serious adverse events were reported in 17 (8%) patients on romosozumab and in 23 (11%) on teriparatide; none were judged treatment related. There were six (3%) patients in the romosozumab group compared with 12 (6%) in the teriparatide group with adverse events leading to investigational product withdrawal. INTERPRETATION: Transition to a bone-forming agent is common practice in patients treated with bisphosphonates, such as those who fracture while on therapy. In such patients, romosozumab led to gains in hip BMD that were not observed with teriparatide. These data could inform clinical decisions for patients at high risk of fracture. FUNDING: Amgen, Astellas, and UCB Pharma.

• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH

Both denosumab (DMB) and bisphosphonates (BPs), antiresorptive drugs (ARDs) used for the treatment of osteoporosis and oncological disorders, are known for their potential to cause medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ). Besides ARDs, statins were recently associated with MRONJ development, especially in patients taking higher doses of statins for a longer period of time. Here, we report a case of a female patient with osteoporosis using statins and treated with alendronate for 3 years who rapidly developed MRONJ stage III after only a single low dose of DMB. After partial maxillectomy complete healing was observed without any recurrence. We performed a literature review of cases with MRONJ triggered by a single low dose of DMB, with or without previous application of other ARDs. Only six similar cases of patients who developed MRONJ after a single low dose of DMB following previous BP therapy have been reported so far. Besides these, literature reports one patient who developed MRONJ after a single dose of DMB following romosozumab treatment and five cases developing MRONJ after a single dose of DMB even without any previous ARD treatment. We suggest that before DMB therapy is initiated, all factors predisposing to MRONJ development should be considered.

• Klíčová slova
• MRONJ, bisphosphonates, case report, denosumab, osteonecrosis of the jaw, osteoporosis, single dose, statin,
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• kazuistiky MeSH

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review focuses on the recent findings regarding bone marrow adipose tissue (BMAT) concerning bone health. We summarize the variations in BMAT in relation to age, sex, and skeletal sites, and provide an update on noninvasive imaging techniques to quantify human BMAT. Next, we discuss the role of BMAT in patients with osteoporosis and interventions that affect BMAT. RECENT FINDINGS: There are wide individual variations with region-specific fluctuation and age- and gender-specific differences in BMAT content and composition. The Bone Marrow Adiposity Society (BMAS) recommendations aim to standardize imaging protocols to increase comparability across studies and sites. Water-fat imaging (WFI) seems an accurate and efficient alternative for spectroscopy (1H-MRS). Most studies indicate that greater BMAT is associated with lower bone mineral density (BMD) and a higher prevalence of vertebral fractures. The proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and changes in lipid composition have been associated with an increased risk of fractures independently of BMD. Therefore, PDFF and lipid composition could potentially be future imaging biomarkers for assessing fracture risk. Evidence of the inhibitory effect of osteoporosis treatments on BMAT is still limited to a few randomized controlled trials. Moreover, results from the FRAME biopsy sub-study highlight contradictory findings on the effect of the sclerostin antibody romosozumab on BMAT. Further understanding of the role(s) of BMAT will provide insight into the pathogenesis of osteoporosis and may lead to targeted preventive and therapeutic strategies.

• Klíčová slova
• Bone marrow adipose tissue, Bone mineral density, Clinical trials, Fractures, Imaging, Lipid composition, Osteoporosis,
• MeSH
• kostní denzita MeSH
• kostní dřeň * diagnostické zobrazování   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• lipidy MeSH
• magnetická rezonanční tomografie metody   MeSH
• osteoporóza * diagnostické zobrazování   patologie   MeSH
• tuková tkáň diagnostické zobrazování   patologie   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• přehledy MeSH
• Názvy látek
• lipidy MeSH

Musculoskeletal disorders, affecting as many as 1.3 billion people worldwide, are the leading cause of disability and impose a substantial health and socioeconomic burden. Despite the high prevalence of these conditions, translational research in this field is far from optimal, highlighting the need for stronger collaboration between basic and clinical scientists. This paper, authored by members of the basic and clinical action groups of the European Calcified Tissue Society (ECTS) and endorsed by the Board of the ECTS, examines the key barriers to effective translational research in musculoskeletal diseases, including clinician workload, differences in professional language and culture, physical distance between research sites, and insufficient interdisciplinary funding. Through interviews with eight institutional managers across five European countries, we observed that in some institutions, the collaboration between basic scientists and clinicians was regarded as no concern (but with room for improvement), and in most institutions it was recognised as a serious issue. We found consensus on the importance of collaboration yet identified discrepancies in the provision of structural and financial support. Based on these findings, we propose strategic initiatives to bridge the gap between basic and clinical research. Suggested measures include dedicated translational funding, integrated research facilities, collaborative scientific forums, strategic collaborations, establishment of physician-scientists, and, finally, bringing basic and clinical researchers together in the same building or even in a combined department. Notable successes, such as the development of the anti-osteoporotic drugs, romosozumab and denosumab, underscore the value of a coordinated approach and exemplify how shared insights between laboratory research and clinical practice can lead to impactful therapeutic advances. Moving forward, we advocate for institutional commitments to foster a robust translational research environment, as well as tailored funding initiatives to support such efforts. This paper serves as a call for discussion and action to enhance interdisciplinary cooperation to advance musculoskeletal medicine and improve outcomes for patients with debilitating musculoskeletal diseases.

• Klíčová slova
• Barriers, Basic scientist, Clinical scientist, Culture, Organisation, Systems medicine,
• MeSH
• biomedicínský výzkum organizace a řízení   MeSH
• kooperační chování MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• muskuloskeletální nemoci * terapie   MeSH
• translační biomedicínský výzkum * MeSH
• výzkumní pracovníci MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• Geografické názvy
• Evropa MeSH