blowout fracture Dotaz Zobrazit nápovědu
AIM: To assess the role of orthoptics in referring patients with orbital floor blowout fracture (OFBF) for conservative or surgical treatment and based on the results, to propose a scoring system for such decision making. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 69 patients with OFBF was performed (35 treated conservatively, 34 surgically). The role of orthoptics in referring to surgery or conservative treatment was retrospectively evaluated, the factors with the highest significance for decision making were identified, and a scoring system proposed using Logistic regression. RESULTS: According to defined criteria, the treatment was unsuccessful in 2 (6%) surgically treated and only in one (3%) conservatively treated patient. The proposed scoring system includes the defect size and several values resulting from the orthoptic examination, the elevation of the eyebulb measured on Lancaster screen being the most significant. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates the benefits of orthoptic examination when making decisions on conservative or surgical treatment and for diagnosing ocular motility disorder (with or without binocular diplopia) in OFBF patients. The proposed scoring system could, following verification in a prospective study, become a valuable adjunctive tool.
- Klíčová slova
- conservative treatment, diplopia, ocular motility, orbital floor blowout fracture, orthoptics, scoring system, surgical treatment,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Background and Objectives: In patients with orbital floor blowout fracture (OFBF), accurate diagnosis of ocular motility disorder is important for decisions about conservative or surgical therapy. However, the accuracy of the traditional test for detecting binocular diplopia/ocular motility disorder using a moving pencil or finger (hereinafter, "finger test") has been generally accepted as correct and has not been subject to scrutiny so far. Hence, its accuracy relative to full orthoptic examination is unknown. Materials and Methods: In this paper, the results of the "finger test" were compared with those derived from a complex examination by orthoptic tests (considered "true" value in patients with OFBF). Results: "Finger test" detected ocular motility disorder in 23% of patients while the full orthoptic examination proved much more efficient, detecting ocular motility disorder in 65% of patients. Lancaster screen test and test with color filters were the most important tests in the battery of the orthoptic tests, capable of identifying 97.7% and 95.3% of patients with ocular motility disorder, respectively. Still, none of the tests were able to correctly detect all patients with ocular motility disorder in itself. Conclusions: As the presence of ocular motility disorder/binocular diplopia is an important indication criterion for the surgical solution of the orbital floor blowout fracture, we conclude that a complex orthoptic evaluation should be always performed in these patients.
- Klíčová slova
- diplopia, maxillofacial surgery, ocular motility disorder, orbit, orbital blowout fractures, orthoptic examination,
- MeSH
- diplopie diagnóza etiologie MeSH
- fraktury očnice * komplikace diagnóza MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- ortoptika MeSH
- poruchy hybnosti oka * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
PURPOSE: The aim is to present a report of a case of bilateral eye injury with bilateral blowout fracture caused by a high-pressure water jet from a fire hose in a 16-year-old girl during a competition for young firefighters. METHODS: We present a case report of a 16-year-old female patient with bilateral extensive eyelid contusion, oedema and lacerations of upper eyelids, lacerations of bulbar conjunctiva, contusion of both eyes, left optic nerve and bilateral blowout fractures of orbits. Results: The initial ocular examination revealed "hand motion" in the right eye and no light perception in the left eye. Intraocular pressure was low in both eyes. Motility of both eyes was reduced, especially in the left eye. Lacerations of the eyelids and conjunctiva required a surgical procedure. No repair of the upper canaliculus of the left eye was attempted. Paralytic mydriasis and loss of lens accommodation in both eyes did not change throughout the follow-up period. A surgical procedure was applied to resolve the left blowout fracture, ocular motility of the right eye improved spontaneously. Traumatic cataract developed in the left eye within 1 year after injury, requiring cataract surgery and posterior capsule lens implantation, the right lens remained clear. Massive scarring of the retina and choroid in the lower parts of the eyes and in the macula reduced best corrected visual acuity in the right eye to 0.15 and in the left eye to 0.08. Intraocular pressure is within normal limits without any glaucoma therapy. The follow up period is three years. CONCLUSION: This is the first reported case of child with an eye injury caused by a high-pressure water jet during a sports activity.
- Klíčová slova
- blowout fracture, body mass index, children, contusion of eye, high-pressure water jet, traumatic cataract,
- MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- extrakce katarakty * MeSH
- hasiči * MeSH
- katarakta * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- poranění oka * komplikace MeSH
- voda MeSH
- zraková ostrost MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- kazuistiky MeSH
- Názvy látek
- voda MeSH
