Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Localization of ventricular activation origin using patient-specific geometry: Preliminary results

S. Zhou, JL. Sapp, A. AbdelWahab, P. Šťovíček, BM. Horáček,

. 2018 ; 29 (7) : 979-986. [pub] 20180515

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19045473

Grantová podpora
CIHR - Canada

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) may include induction of VT and localization of VT-exit site. Our aim was to assess localization performance of a novel statistical pace-mapping method and compare it with performance of an electrocardiographic inverse solution. METHODS: Seven patients undergoing ablation of VT (4 with epicardial, 3 with endocardial exit) aided by electroanatomic mapping underwent intraprocedural 120-lead body-surface potential mapping (BSPM). Two approaches to localization of activation origin were tested: (1) A statistical method, based on multiple linear regression (MLR), which required only the conventional 12-lead ECG for a sufficient number of pacing sites with known origin together with patient-specific geometry of the endocardial/epicardial surface obtained by electroanatomic mapping; and (2) a classical deterministic inverse solution for recovering heart-surface potentials, which required BSPM and patient-specific geometry of the heart and torso obtained via computed tomography (CT). RESULTS: For the MLR method, at least 10-15 pacing sites with known coordinates, together with their corresponding 12-lead ECGs, were required to derive reliable patient-specific regression equations, which then enabled accurate localization of ventricular activation with unknown origin. For 4 patients who underwent epicardial mapping, the median of localization error for the MLR was significantly lower than that for the inverse solution (10.6 vs. 27.3 mm, P  =  0.034); a similar result held for 3 patients who underwent endocardial mapping (7.7 vs. 17.1 mm, P  =  0.017). The pooled localization error for all epicardial and endocardial sites was also significantly smaller for the MLR compared with the inverse solution (P  =  0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The novel pace-mapping approach to localizing the origin of ventricular activation offers an easily implementable supplement and/or alternative to the preprocedure inverse solution; its simplicity makes it suitable for real-time applications during clinical catheter-ablation procedures.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19045473
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200113082248.0
007      
ta
008      
200109s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/jce.13622 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29702740
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Zhou, Shijie $u School of Biomedical Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
245    10
$a Localization of ventricular activation origin using patient-specific geometry: Preliminary results / $c S. Zhou, JL. Sapp, A. AbdelWahab, P. Šťovíček, BM. Horáček,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) may include induction of VT and localization of VT-exit site. Our aim was to assess localization performance of a novel statistical pace-mapping method and compare it with performance of an electrocardiographic inverse solution. METHODS: Seven patients undergoing ablation of VT (4 with epicardial, 3 with endocardial exit) aided by electroanatomic mapping underwent intraprocedural 120-lead body-surface potential mapping (BSPM). Two approaches to localization of activation origin were tested: (1) A statistical method, based on multiple linear regression (MLR), which required only the conventional 12-lead ECG for a sufficient number of pacing sites with known origin together with patient-specific geometry of the endocardial/epicardial surface obtained by electroanatomic mapping; and (2) a classical deterministic inverse solution for recovering heart-surface potentials, which required BSPM and patient-specific geometry of the heart and torso obtained via computed tomography (CT). RESULTS: For the MLR method, at least 10-15 pacing sites with known coordinates, together with their corresponding 12-lead ECGs, were required to derive reliable patient-specific regression equations, which then enabled accurate localization of ventricular activation with unknown origin. For 4 patients who underwent epicardial mapping, the median of localization error for the MLR was significantly lower than that for the inverse solution (10.6 vs. 27.3 mm, P  =  0.034); a similar result held for 3 patients who underwent endocardial mapping (7.7 vs. 17.1 mm, P  =  0.017). The pooled localization error for all epicardial and endocardial sites was also significantly smaller for the MLR compared with the inverse solution (P  =  0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The novel pace-mapping approach to localizing the origin of ventricular activation offers an easily implementable supplement and/or alternative to the preprocedure inverse solution; its simplicity makes it suitable for real-time applications during clinical catheter-ablation procedures.
650    _2
$a mapování potenciálů tělesného povrchu $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D018780
650    _2
$a katetrizační ablace $x metody $7 D017115
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a zobrazování trojrozměrné $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D021621
650    _2
$a anatomické modely $7 D008953
650    12
$a modely kardiovaskulární $7 D008955
650    _2
$a komorová tachykardie $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patofyziologie $x chirurgie $7 D017180
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Sapp, John L $u Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
700    1_
$a AbdelWahab, Amir $u Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
700    1_
$a Šťovíček, Petr $u General University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Horáček, B Milan $u School of Biomedical Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
773    0_
$w MED00002569 $t Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology $x 1540-8167 $g Roč. 29, č. 7 (2018), s. 979-986
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29702740 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20200109 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200113082620 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1483742 $s 1084146
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 29 $c 7 $d 979-986 $e 20180515 $i 1540-8167 $m Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology $n J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol $x MED00002569
GRA    __
$p CIHR $2 Canada
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20200109

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...