• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Přirozený vývoj bikuspidální aortální chlopně
[Natural history of asymptomatic patients with normally functioning or minimally dysfunctional bicuspid aortic valve in the community]

Hector I. Michelena, et al.

. 2008 ; 2 (5) : 35-36.

Jazyk čeština Země Česko

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc07521960

Bicuspid aortic valve is frequent and is reported to cause numerous complications, but the clinical outcome of patients diagnosed with normal or mildly dysfunctional valve is undefined. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 212 asymptomatic community residents from Olmsted County, Minn (age, 32+/-20 years; 65% male), bicuspid aortic valve was diagnosed between 1980 and 1999 with ejection fraction > or =50% and aortic regurgitation or stenosis, absent or mild. Aortic valve degeneration at diagnosis was scored echocardiographically for calcification, thickening, and mobility reduction (0 to 3 each), with scores ranging from 0 to 9. At diagnosis, ejection fraction was 63+/-5% and left ventricular diameter was 48+/-9 mm. Survival 20 years after diagnosis was 90+/-3%, identical to the general population (P=0.72). Twenty years after diagnosis, heart failure, new cardiac symptoms, and cardiovascular medical events occurred in 7+/-2%, 26+/-4%, and 33+/-5%, respectively. Twenty years after diagnosis, aortic valve surgery, ascending aortic surgery, or any cardiovascular surgery was required in 24+/-4%, 5+/-2%, and 27+/-4% at a younger age than the general population (P<0.0001). No aortic dissection occurred. Thus, cardiovascular medical or surgical events occurred in 42+/-5% 20 years after diagnosis. Independent predictors of cardiovascular events were age > or =50 years (risk ratio, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 5.7; P<0.01) and valve degeneration at diagnosis (risk ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 4.5; P=0.016; >70% events at 20 years). Baseline ascending aorta > or =40 mm independently predicted surgery for aorta dilatation (risk ratio, 10.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.8 to 77.3; P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In the community, asymptomatic patients with bicuspid aortic valve and no or minimal hemodynamic abnormality enjoy excellent long-term survival but incur frequent cardiovascular events, particularly with progressive valve dysfunction. Echocardiographic valve degeneration at diagnosis separates higher-risk patients who require regular assessment from lower-risk patients who require only episodic follow-up.

Natural history of asymptomatic patients with normally functioning or minimally dysfunctional bicuspid aortic valve in the community

000      
00000naa 2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc07521960
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20111210133036.0
008      
090423s2008 xr e cze||
009      
AR
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a cze $b eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Michelena, Hector I.
245    10
$a Přirozený vývoj bikuspidální aortální chlopně / $c Hector I. Michelena, et al.
246    11
$a Natural history of asymptomatic patients with normally functioning or minimally dysfunctional bicuspid aortic valve in the community
314    __
$a Divisions of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester
520    9_
$a Bicuspid aortic valve is frequent and is reported to cause numerous complications, but the clinical outcome of patients diagnosed with normal or mildly dysfunctional valve is undefined. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 212 asymptomatic community residents from Olmsted County, Minn (age, 32+/-20 years; 65% male), bicuspid aortic valve was diagnosed between 1980 and 1999 with ejection fraction > or =50% and aortic regurgitation or stenosis, absent or mild. Aortic valve degeneration at diagnosis was scored echocardiographically for calcification, thickening, and mobility reduction (0 to 3 each), with scores ranging from 0 to 9. At diagnosis, ejection fraction was 63+/-5% and left ventricular diameter was 48+/-9 mm. Survival 20 years after diagnosis was 90+/-3%, identical to the general population (P=0.72). Twenty years after diagnosis, heart failure, new cardiac symptoms, and cardiovascular medical events occurred in 7+/-2%, 26+/-4%, and 33+/-5%, respectively. Twenty years after diagnosis, aortic valve surgery, ascending aortic surgery, or any cardiovascular surgery was required in 24+/-4%, 5+/-2%, and 27+/-4% at a younger age than the general population (P<0.0001). No aortic dissection occurred. Thus, cardiovascular medical or surgical events occurred in 42+/-5% 20 years after diagnosis. Independent predictors of cardiovascular events were age > or =50 years (risk ratio, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 5.7; P<0.01) and valve degeneration at diagnosis (risk ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 4.5; P=0.016; >70% events at 20 years). Baseline ascending aorta > or =40 mm independently predicted surgery for aorta dilatation (risk ratio, 10.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.8 to 77.3; P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In the community, asymptomatic patients with bicuspid aortic valve and no or minimal hemodynamic abnormality enjoy excellent long-term survival but incur frequent cardiovascular events, particularly with progressive valve dysfunction. Echocardiographic valve degeneration at diagnosis separates higher-risk patients who require regular assessment from lower-risk patients who require only episodic follow-up.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a aortální chlopeň $x abnormality $x fyziologie $x ultrasonografie $7 D001021
650    _2
$a aortální insuficience $7 D001022
650    _2
$a dopplerovská echokardiografie $7 D015150
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
650    _2
$a srdeční selhání $x mortalita $7 D006333
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a incidence $7 D015994
650    _2
$a longitudinální studie $7 D008137
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a stupeň závažnosti nemoci $7 D012720
650    _2
$a tepový objem $7 D013318
650    _2
$a analýza přežití $7 D016019
651    _2
$a Minnesota $7 D008910
773    0_
$w MED00012706 $t Clinical cardiology alert $g Roč. 2, č. 5 (2008), s. 35-36 $x 1213-2586
787    18
$w bmc07521963 $i Recenze v: $t Komentář [k článku Přirozený vývoj bikuspidální aortální chlopně]
910    __
$a ABA008 $b B 2242 $c 407 a $y 9
990    __
$a 20090423080915 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20090601112129 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 645049 $s 497965
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2008 $b 2 $c 5 $d 35-36 $i 1213-2586 $m Clinical Cardiology Alert $x MED00012706
LZP    __
$a 2009-15/mkme

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...