• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

CT koronární angiografie - jsme už tak daleko?
[Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT]

J. M. Miller, et al.

. 2009 ; 3 (1) : 3-4.

Jazyk čeština Země Česko

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc07526116

The accuracy of multidetector computed tomographic (CT) angiography involving 64 detectors has not been well established. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter study to examine the accuracy of 64-row, 0.5-mm multidetector CT angiography as compared with conventional coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Nine centers enrolled patients who underwent calcium scoring and multidetector CT angiography before conventional coronary angiography. In 291 patients with calcium scores of 600 or less, segments 1.5 mm or more in diameter were analyzed by means of CT and conventional angiography at independent core laboratories. Stenoses of 50% or more were considered obstructive. The area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate diagnostic accuracy relative to that of conventional angiography and subsequent revascularization status, whereas disease severity was assessed with the use of the modified Duke Coronary Artery Disease Index. RESULTS: A total of 56% of patients had obstructive coronary artery disease. The patient-based diagnostic accuracy of quantitative CT angiography for detecting or ruling out stenoses of 50% or more according to conventional angiography revealed an AUC of 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90 to 0.96), with a sensitivity of 85% (95% CI, 79 to 90), a specificity of 90% (95% CI, 83 to 94), a positive predictive value of 91% (95% CI, 86 to 95), and a negative predictive value of 83% (95% CI, 75 to 89). CT angiography was similar to conventional angiography in its ability to identify patients who subsequently underwent revascularization: the AUC was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.88) for multidetector CT angiography and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.86) for conventional angiography. A per-vessel analysis of 866 vessels yielded an AUC of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88 to 0.93). Disease severity ascertained by CT and conventional angiography was well correlated (r=0.81; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.84). Two patients had important reactions to contrast medium after CT angiography. CONCLUSIONS: Multidetector CT angiography accurately identifies the presence and severity of obstructive coronary artery disease and subsequent revascularization in symptomatic patients. The negative and positive predictive values indicate that multidetector CT angiography cannot replace conventional coronary angiography at present. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00738218.) 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society

Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT

000      
00000naa 2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc07526116
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20111210142910.0
008      
090709s2009 xr e cze||
009      
AR
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a cze $b eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Miller, J. M.
245    10
$a CT koronární angiografie - jsme už tak daleko? / $c J. M. Miller, et al.
246    11
$a Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT
314    __
$a Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore
520    9_
$a The accuracy of multidetector computed tomographic (CT) angiography involving 64 detectors has not been well established. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter study to examine the accuracy of 64-row, 0.5-mm multidetector CT angiography as compared with conventional coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Nine centers enrolled patients who underwent calcium scoring and multidetector CT angiography before conventional coronary angiography. In 291 patients with calcium scores of 600 or less, segments 1.5 mm or more in diameter were analyzed by means of CT and conventional angiography at independent core laboratories. Stenoses of 50% or more were considered obstructive. The area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate diagnostic accuracy relative to that of conventional angiography and subsequent revascularization status, whereas disease severity was assessed with the use of the modified Duke Coronary Artery Disease Index. RESULTS: A total of 56% of patients had obstructive coronary artery disease. The patient-based diagnostic accuracy of quantitative CT angiography for detecting or ruling out stenoses of 50% or more according to conventional angiography revealed an AUC of 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90 to 0.96), with a sensitivity of 85% (95% CI, 79 to 90), a specificity of 90% (95% CI, 83 to 94), a positive predictive value of 91% (95% CI, 86 to 95), and a negative predictive value of 83% (95% CI, 75 to 89). CT angiography was similar to conventional angiography in its ability to identify patients who subsequently underwent revascularization: the AUC was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.88) for multidetector CT angiography and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.86) for conventional angiography. A per-vessel analysis of 866 vessels yielded an AUC of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88 to 0.93). Disease severity ascertained by CT and conventional angiography was well correlated (r=0.81; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.84). Two patients had important reactions to contrast medium after CT angiography. CONCLUSIONS: Multidetector CT angiography accurately identifies the presence and severity of obstructive coronary artery disease and subsequent revascularization in symptomatic patients. The negative and positive predictive values indicate that multidetector CT angiography cannot replace conventional coronary angiography at present. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00738218.) 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a angina pectoris $x klasifikace $x radiografie $7 D000787
650    _2
$a plocha pod křivkou $7 D019540
650    _2
$a koronární angiografie $x škodlivé účinky $7 D017023
650    _2
$a nemoci koronárních tepen $x radiografie $7 D003324
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
650    _2
$a ROC křivka $7 D012372
650    _2
$a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
650    _2
$a stupeň závažnosti nemoci $7 D012720
650    _2
$a jednoduchá slepá metoda $7 D016037
650    _2
$a hodnocení biomedicínských technologií $7 D013673
650    _2
$a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $x metody $x škodlivé účinky $7 D014057
773    0_
$w MED00012706 $t Clinical cardiology alert $g Roč. 3, č. 1 (2009), s. 3-4 $x 1213-2586
787    18
$w bmc07526117 $i Recenze v: $t Komentář [k článku CT koronární angiografie - jsme už tak daleko?]
910    __
$a ABA008 $b B 2242 $c 407 a $y 9
990    __
$a 20090709104339 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20090907120405 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 668414 $s 525669
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2009 $b 3 $c 1 $d 3-4 $i 1213-2586 $m Clinical Cardiology Alert $x MED00012706
LZP    __
$a 2009-22/mkme

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...