-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Reverzní endoprotéza ramenního kloubu
[Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty]
Antony Hazel, Thay Q. Lee, Ranjan Gupta
Jazyk čeština Země Česko
Typ dokumentu přehledy
- MeSH
- artroplastiky kloubů metody využití MeSH
- biomechanika MeSH
- chirurgie operační metody využití MeSH
- diferenciální diagnóza MeSH
- humerus chirurgie MeSH
- klinické zkoušky jako téma MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- protézy kloubů MeSH
- radiografie MeSH
- ramenní kloub anatomie a histologie chirurgie MeSH
- rotátorová manžeta MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- výsledky a postupy - zhodnocení (zdravotní péče) MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- přehledy MeSH
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty was first introduced in Europe by Paul Grammont 20 years ago. Since then, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty has been refined and has gained popularity, especially for the treatment of rotator cuff tear arthropathy. The indications for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty now include revision arthroplasty and complex proximal humeral fractures. In contrast to standard shoulder arthroplasty procedures, which have a dynamic center of rotation, the problem of having a stable center of rotation is solved with the reverse shoulder prosthesis. By converting the humerus to a socket and the glenoid to a ball, the center of rotation is fixed at the glenohumeral joint with the reverse shoulder prosthesis. Recent research examining the biomechanical properties of the reverse prosthesis have demonstrated the importance of considering the anatomy in the region for proper placement of the glenoid component for stability and to maximize the range of motion. As more clinical trials using the reverse shoulder arthroplasty procedure become available, the complications are increasingly becoming recognized and may ultimately affect the surgical procedure itself. Orthopaedic surgeons are continuing to modify the surgical technique and design of the prosthesis to improve outcomes and have demonstrated that there is room for improvement in these areas. As the indications have expanded to include revision arthroplasty and complex proximal humeral fractures, surgeons have developed new methods to potentially improve outcomes by including latissimus dorsi transfer, proximal humeral bone grafting or glenoid bone grafting.
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
Horní končetina
Lit.: 43
- 000
- 00000naa 2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc10004263
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20111210160410.0
- 008
- 100219s2009 xr e cze||
- 009
- AR
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a cze $b eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Hazel, Antony
- 245 10
- $a Reverzní endoprotéza ramenního kloubu / $c Antony Hazel, Thay Q. Lee, Ranjan Gupta
- 246 11
- $a Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
- 246 13
- $a Horní končetina
- 314 __
- $a Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Univesity of California, Irvine
- 504 __
- $a Lit.: 43
- 520 9_
- $a Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty was first introduced in Europe by Paul Grammont 20 years ago. Since then, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty has been refined and has gained popularity, especially for the treatment of rotator cuff tear arthropathy. The indications for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty now include revision arthroplasty and complex proximal humeral fractures. In contrast to standard shoulder arthroplasty procedures, which have a dynamic center of rotation, the problem of having a stable center of rotation is solved with the reverse shoulder prosthesis. By converting the humerus to a socket and the glenoid to a ball, the center of rotation is fixed at the glenohumeral joint with the reverse shoulder prosthesis. Recent research examining the biomechanical properties of the reverse prosthesis have demonstrated the importance of considering the anatomy in the region for proper placement of the glenoid component for stability and to maximize the range of motion. As more clinical trials using the reverse shoulder arthroplasty procedure become available, the complications are increasingly becoming recognized and may ultimately affect the surgical procedure itself. Orthopaedic surgeons are continuing to modify the surgical technique and design of the prosthesis to improve outcomes and have demonstrated that there is room for improvement in these areas. As the indications have expanded to include revision arthroplasty and complex proximal humeral fractures, surgeons have developed new methods to potentially improve outcomes by including latissimus dorsi transfer, proximal humeral bone grafting or glenoid bone grafting.
- 650 _2
- $a artroplastiky kloubů $x metody $x využití $7 D019643
- 650 _2
- $a protézy kloubů $7 D007595
- 650 _2
- $a humerus $x chirurgie $7 D006811
- 650 _2
- $a ramenní kloub $x anatomie a histologie $x chirurgie $7 D012785
- 650 _2
- $a rotátorová manžeta $7 D017006
- 650 _2
- $a biomechanika $7 D001696
- 650 _2
- $a diferenciální diagnóza $7 D003937
- 650 _2
- $a radiografie $7 D011859
- 650 _2
- $a chirurgie operační $x metody $x využití $7 D013514
- 650 _2
- $a klinické zkoušky jako téma $7 D002986
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a výsledky a postupy - zhodnocení (zdravotní péče) $7 D010043
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Lee, Thay Q.
- 700 1_
- $a Gupta, Ranjan
- 773 0_
- $w MED00166282 $t Current orthopaedic practice $g Roč. 1, č. 3 (2009), s. 72-81 $x 1803-6848
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b B 2585 $c 503 $y 8
- 990 __
- $a 20100219114911 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20100323132250 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 713684 $s 576613
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2009 $b 1 $c 3 $d 72-81 $i 1803-6848 $m Current Orthopaedic Practice $x MED00166282
- LZP __
- $a 2010-03/mkrk