Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Vliv výše krevního tlaku na renální prognózu a kardiovaskulární prognóza u pacientů s diabetickou nefropatií na podkladě diabetu 2. typu

George L. Bakris et al.

Jazyk čeština Země Česko

Typ dokumentu multicentrická studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc10019814

Digitální knihovna NLK
Číslo
Ročník
Zdroj

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials of nephropathy in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus have not examined the effects of systolic blood pressure (SBP) or pulse pressure (PP) on the time to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or death. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of baseline and treated SBP, diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and PP on composite and individual outcomes including doubling of serum creatinine, ESRD, or death in participants of the Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM (non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus) With the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) Study; to assess the specific effect of the angiotensin receptor blocker losartan potassium on composite and renal outcomes; and to explore the implications of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers as concurrent therapy on composite and renal outcomes. DESIGN: A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to assess the hazard risk profile of baseline SBP (categories: <130, 130-139, 140-159, 160-179, and > or =180 mm Hg), DBP (categories: <70, 70-79, 80-89, 90-99, and > or =100 mm Hg), and PP (categories: <60, 60-69, 70-79, 80-89, and > or =90 mm Hg) on renal outcomes. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 1513 participants with established nephropathy and hypertension associated with type 2 diabetes. INTERVENTIONS: The RENAAL study was a randomized, placebo-controlled study of losartan vs placebo, with other agents added to achieve the goal of a trough BP (ie, BP immediately prior to the next dosing) below 140/90 mm Hg, and had a mean follow-up of 3.4 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary analysis was time to composite end point of doubling of serum creatinine, ESRD, or death. RESULTS: A baseline SBP range of 140 to 159 mm Hg increased risk for ESRD or death by 38% (P =.05) compared with those below 130 mm Hg. In a multivariate model, every 10-mm Hg rise in baseline SBP increased the risk for ESRD or death by 6.7% (P =.007); the same rise in DBP decreased the risk by 10.9% (P =.01) when adjusting for urinary albumin-creatinine ratio, serum creatinine, serum albumin, hemoglobin, and hemoglobin A1c. Those randomized to the losartan group with a baseline PP above 90 mm Hg had a 53.5% risk reduction for ESRD alone (P =.003) and a 35.5% risk reduction for ESRD or death (P =.02) compared with the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline SBP is a stronger predictor than DBP of renal outcomes in those with nephropathy resulting from type 2 diabetes. Those with the highest baseline PP have the highest risk for nephropathy progression but also garner the greatest risk reduction with SBP lowered to less than 140 mm Hg.

000      
00000naa 2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc10019814
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20111210183023.0
008      
100908s2003 xr e cze||
009      
AR
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a cze $b eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Bakris, George L.
245    10
$a Vliv výše krevního tlaku na renální prognózu a kardiovaskulární prognóza u pacientů s diabetickou nefropatií na podkladě diabetu 2. typu / $c George L. Bakris et al.
314    __
$a Department of Preventive Medicine, Rush Presbyterian/St Luke's Medical Center, Rush Medical College, Chicago gbakris@earthlink.net
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Clinical trials of nephropathy in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus have not examined the effects of systolic blood pressure (SBP) or pulse pressure (PP) on the time to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or death. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of baseline and treated SBP, diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and PP on composite and individual outcomes including doubling of serum creatinine, ESRD, or death in participants of the Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM (non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus) With the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) Study; to assess the specific effect of the angiotensin receptor blocker losartan potassium on composite and renal outcomes; and to explore the implications of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers as concurrent therapy on composite and renal outcomes. DESIGN: A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to assess the hazard risk profile of baseline SBP (categories: <130, 130-139, 140-159, 160-179, and > or =180 mm Hg), DBP (categories: <70, 70-79, 80-89, 90-99, and > or =100 mm Hg), and PP (categories: <60, 60-69, 70-79, 80-89, and > or =90 mm Hg) on renal outcomes. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 1513 participants with established nephropathy and hypertension associated with type 2 diabetes. INTERVENTIONS: The RENAAL study was a randomized, placebo-controlled study of losartan vs placebo, with other agents added to achieve the goal of a trough BP (ie, BP immediately prior to the next dosing) below 140/90 mm Hg, and had a mean follow-up of 3.4 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary analysis was time to composite end point of doubling of serum creatinine, ESRD, or death. RESULTS: A baseline SBP range of 140 to 159 mm Hg increased risk for ESRD or death by 38% (P =.05) compared with those below 130 mm Hg. In a multivariate model, every 10-mm Hg rise in baseline SBP increased the risk for ESRD or death by 6.7% (P =.007); the same rise in DBP decreased the risk by 10.9% (P =.01) when adjusting for urinary albumin-creatinine ratio, serum creatinine, serum albumin, hemoglobin, and hemoglobin A1c. Those randomized to the losartan group with a baseline PP above 90 mm Hg had a 53.5% risk reduction for ESRD alone (P =.003) and a 35.5% risk reduction for ESRD or death (P =.02) compared with the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline SBP is a stronger predictor than DBP of renal outcomes in those with nephropathy resulting from type 2 diabetes. Those with the highest baseline PP have the highest risk for nephropathy progression but also garner the greatest risk reduction with SBP lowered to less than 140 mm Hg.
650    _2
$a klinické zkoušky jako téma $7 D002986
650    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma $7 D016032
650    _2
$a antihypertenziva $x terapeutické užití $7 D000959
650    _2
$a blokátory kalciových kanálů $x terapeutické užití $7 D002121
650    _2
$a diabetes mellitus 2. typu $x farmakoterapie $x patofyziologie $7 D003924
650    _2
$a diabetické nefropatie $x farmakoterapie $x patofyziologie $7 D003928
650    _2
$a progrese nemoci $7 D018450
650    _2
$a dvojitá slepá metoda $7 D004311
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a hypertenze $x farmakoterapie $x patofyziologie $7 D006973
650    _2
$a chronické selhání ledvin $x prevence a kontrola $7 D007676
650    _2
$a losartan $x terapeutické užití $7 D019808
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a proporcionální rizikové modely $7 D016016
650    _2
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
773    0_
$w MED00012709 $t Postgraduální nefrologie $g Roč. 1, č. 3 (2003), s. 4 $x 1214-178X
787    18
$w bmc10019816 $i Recenze v: $t Komentář [k článku Vliv výše krevního tlaku na renální prognózu a kardiovaskulární prognóza u pacientů s diabetickou nefropatií na podkladě diabetu 2. typu]
910    __
$a ABA008 $b B 2318 $c 893 $y 7
990    __
$a 20100830113932 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20110128155938 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 768838 $s 632770
BAS    __
$a 3 $a
BMC    __
$a 2003 $b 1 $c 3 $d 4 $m Postgraduální nefrologie $x MED00012709
LZP    __
$a 2010-24/mkme

Najít záznam