-
Something wrong with this record ?
Prognostic and diagnostic accuracy of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in 190 patients with carcinoma of unknown primary
P Fencl, O Belohlavek, M Skopalova, M Jaruskova, I Kantorova, K Simonova
Language English Country Germany
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 2002 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2002-01-01 to 1 year ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2002 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2002 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 diagnostic use MeSH
- Risk Assessment methods MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Neoplasms, Unknown Primary mortality MeSH
- Positron-Emission Tomography statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Prevalence MeSH
- Prognosis MeSH
- Radiopharmaceuticals diagnostic use MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- Risk Factors MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Sensitivity and Specificity MeSH
- Subtraction Technique MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to determine the accuracy of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT in the search for the primary and the presence of a malignancy. The prognostic value of FDG-PET/CT information was tested. METHODS: A total of 190 patients were retrospectively analysed: 82 with histologically proven metastases (HPM) and 108 with clinical suspicion of the presence of a malignancy (CSM). The sensitivity and specificity were determined. Overall survival was calculated to evaluate the prognostic value of the FDG-PET/CT findings. RESULTS: In the search for the primary, the sensitivity and specificity were 62.0% and 81.9%, respectively. In the search for the presence of a malignancy, the sensitivity and specificity were 93.6% and 85.7%, respectively. Between the HPM and CSM groups, no significant difference in sensitivity and specificity was found either in the search for the primary or in the search for the presence of a malignancy. No significant difference in the sensitivity and specificity was found between 78 patients who were investigated by contrast-enhanced FDG-PET/CT and the remaining patients. A significantly shorter overall survival was found among patients with positive FDG-PET/CT findings compared with patients with negative findings (p = 0.00001); no significant difference in survival was found between the HPM and the CSM group (p = 0.770). CONCLUSION: FDG-PET/CT imaging is very helpful in the search for the presence of a malignancy in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary syndrome. FDG-PET/CT is less accurate in identifying exactly the site of a primary. Discovery of a hypermetabolic lesion was associated with the worst survival rate.
- 000
- 00000naa 2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc10026159
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20111210192244.0
- 008
- 101018s2007 gw e eng||
- 009
- AR
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Fencl, Pavel $7 xx0074214
- 245 10
- $a Prognostic and diagnostic accuracy of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in 190 patients with carcinoma of unknown primary / $c P Fencl, O Belohlavek, M Skopalova, M Jaruskova, I Kantorova, K Simonova
- 314 __
- $a PET Center, Na Homolce Hospital, Roentgenova 2, 150 30 Prague 5, Czech Republic. fencl42@seznam.cz
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to determine the accuracy of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT in the search for the primary and the presence of a malignancy. The prognostic value of FDG-PET/CT information was tested. METHODS: A total of 190 patients were retrospectively analysed: 82 with histologically proven metastases (HPM) and 108 with clinical suspicion of the presence of a malignancy (CSM). The sensitivity and specificity were determined. Overall survival was calculated to evaluate the prognostic value of the FDG-PET/CT findings. RESULTS: In the search for the primary, the sensitivity and specificity were 62.0% and 81.9%, respectively. In the search for the presence of a malignancy, the sensitivity and specificity were 93.6% and 85.7%, respectively. Between the HPM and CSM groups, no significant difference in sensitivity and specificity was found either in the search for the primary or in the search for the presence of a malignancy. No significant difference in the sensitivity and specificity was found between 78 patients who were investigated by contrast-enhanced FDG-PET/CT and the remaining patients. A significantly shorter overall survival was found among patients with positive FDG-PET/CT findings compared with patients with negative findings (p = 0.00001); no significant difference in survival was found between the HPM and the CSM group (p = 0.770). CONCLUSION: FDG-PET/CT imaging is very helpful in the search for the presence of a malignancy in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary syndrome. FDG-PET/CT is less accurate in identifying exactly the site of a primary. Discovery of a hypermetabolic lesion was associated with the worst survival rate.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a fluorodeoxyglukosa F18 $x diagnostické užití $7 D019788
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a nádory neznámé primární lokalizace $x mortalita $x radioizotopová diagnostika $7 D009382
- 650 _2
- $a pozitronová emisní tomografie $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D049268
- 650 _2
- $a prevalence $7 D015995
- 650 _2
- $a prognóza $7 D011379
- 650 _2
- $a radiofarmaka $x diagnostické užití $7 D019275
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a hodnocení rizik $x metody $7 D018570
- 650 _2
- $a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
- 650 _2
- $a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
- 650 _2
- $a subtrakční technika $7 D013382
- 650 _2
- $a Tomography, X-Ray Computed $x sn [Statistics & Numerical Data]
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $x epidemiologie $7 D018153
- 700 1_
- $a Bělohlávek, Otakar, $d 1964- $7 ola2003188678
- 700 1_
- $a Skopalová, Magdaléna $7 xx0137935
- 700 1_
- $a Jarůšková, Monika, $7 xx0104659 $d 1970-
- 700 1_
- $a Kantorová, Iva $7 xx0172642
- 700 1_
- $a Šimonová, Kateřina $7 xx0143820
- 773 0_
- $w MED00007222 $t European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging $g Roč. 34, č. 11 (2007), s. 1783-1792 $x 1619-7070
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b x $y 7
- 990 __
- $a 20101018091031 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20101020131943 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 801264 $s 666006
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2007 $b 34 $c 11 $d 1783-1792 $i 1619-7070 $m European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging $n Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging $x MED00007222
- LZP __
- $a 2010-B/jtme