-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Comparison of 111In-DOTA-NOC and 111I-DOTA-TATE distribution in the target and dose-limiting tissues: conflicting results in vitro and in vivo
J Cihlo, L Melicharova, M Petrik, A Laznickova, M Laznicek
Jazyk angličtina Země Řecko
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 2004 do Před 2 roky
Open Access Digital Library
od 2004-01-01
- MeSH
- buněčné linie MeSH
- financování organizované MeSH
- krysa rodu rattus MeSH
- ledvinové kanálky metabolismus MeSH
- nádorové buněčné linie MeSH
- nádory slinivky břišní metabolismus MeSH
- oktreotid analogy a deriváty farmakokinetika chemie MeSH
- organokovové sloučeniny farmakokinetika chemie MeSH
- potkani Wistar MeSH
- radiofarmaka farmakokinetika MeSH
- radioizotopy india MeSH
- receptory somatostatinu metabolismus MeSH
- tkáňová distribuce MeSH
- vačicovití MeSH
- vysokoúčinná kapalinová chromatografie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- krysa rodu rattus MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- srovnávací studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: In this study, some important biological characteristics of two radiolabelled somatostatin analogues 111In-DOTA-1-Nal3-octreotide (DOTA-NOC) and 111In-DOTA-Tyr3-octreotate (DOTA-TATE) were compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rats were used for in vivo biodistribution experiments and in vitro cell models (OK and AR42J cell lines) were used for simulating the internalization in the kidney and in subtype 2 somatostatin receptor (SSTR2)-positive tissues, respectively. RESULTS: Significantly higher radioactivity concentrations in rat organs with high density of somatostatin receptors after 111In-DOTA-NOC administration in comparison with 111In-DOTA-TATE were observed. The predominant urine excretion was associated with accumulation of the radioactivity in the kidney, where higher retention of 111In-DOTA-TATE compared to 111In-DOTA-NOC was detected. In the OK cell line the opposite results were found. No significant differences in the in vitro internalization and externalization of radioactivity to AR42J cell line were found for either peptide suggesting their same affinity for SSTR2. CONCLUSION: Preclinical experiments indicated that 111In-DOTA-NOC is a very promising peptide for somatostatin receptor-positive tumour visualization. The conflict between the in vitro and in vivo kidney handling showed that the transfer of results from in vitro to in vivo conditions and their interpretation should be performed very carefully because both types of experiments can be affected by different factors, making their simple comparison difficult.
- 000
- 02086naa 2200481 a 4500
- 001
- bmc11003651
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20111210202357.0
- 008
- 110302s2008 gr e eng||
- 009
- AR
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gr
- 100 1_
- $a Cihlo, Jan. $7 xx0238217
- 245 10
- $a Comparison of 111In-DOTA-NOC and 111I-DOTA-TATE distribution in the target and dose-limiting tissues: conflicting results in vitro and in vivo / $c J Cihlo, L Melicharova, M Petrik, A Laznickova, M Laznicek
- 314 __
- $a Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: In this study, some important biological characteristics of two radiolabelled somatostatin analogues 111In-DOTA-1-Nal3-octreotide (DOTA-NOC) and 111In-DOTA-Tyr3-octreotate (DOTA-TATE) were compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rats were used for in vivo biodistribution experiments and in vitro cell models (OK and AR42J cell lines) were used for simulating the internalization in the kidney and in subtype 2 somatostatin receptor (SSTR2)-positive tissues, respectively. RESULTS: Significantly higher radioactivity concentrations in rat organs with high density of somatostatin receptors after 111In-DOTA-NOC administration in comparison with 111In-DOTA-TATE were observed. The predominant urine excretion was associated with accumulation of the radioactivity in the kidney, where higher retention of 111In-DOTA-TATE compared to 111In-DOTA-NOC was detected. In the OK cell line the opposite results were found. No significant differences in the in vitro internalization and externalization of radioactivity to AR42J cell line were found for either peptide suggesting their same affinity for SSTR2. CONCLUSION: Preclinical experiments indicated that 111In-DOTA-NOC is a very promising peptide for somatostatin receptor-positive tumour visualization. The conflict between the in vitro and in vivo kidney handling showed that the transfer of results from in vitro to in vivo conditions and their interpretation should be performed very carefully because both types of experiments can be affected by different factors, making their simple comparison difficult.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a buněčné linie $7 D002460
- 650 _2
- $a nádorové buněčné linie $7 D045744
- 650 _2
- $a vysokoúčinná kapalinová chromatografie $7 D002851
- 650 _2
- $a radioizotopy india $7 D007205
- 650 _2
- $a ledvinové kanálky $x metabolismus $7 D007684
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a oktreotid $x analogy a deriváty $x farmakokinetika $x chemie $7 D015282
- 650 _2
- $a vačicovití $7 D009893
- 650 _2
- $a organokovové sloučeniny $x farmakokinetika $x chemie $7 D009942
- 650 _2
- $a nádory slinivky břišní $x metabolismus $7 D010190
- 650 _2
- $a radiofarmaka $x farmakokinetika $7 D019275
- 650 _2
- $a krysa rodu Rattus $7 D051381
- 650 _2
- $a potkani Wistar $7 D017208
- 650 _2
- $a receptory somatostatinu $x metabolismus $7 D017481
- 650 _2
- $a tkáňová distribuce $7 D014018
- 650 _2
- $a financování organizované $7 D005381
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 700 1_
- $a Melicharová, Ludmila, $d 1962- $7 xx0105436
- 700 1_
- $a Petřík, Miloš $7 xx0169395
- 700 1_
- $a Lázníčková, Alice, $d 1948- $7 nlk19990073515
- 700 1_
- $a Lázníček, Milan, $d 1947- $7 nlk19990073514
- 773 0_
- $t Anticancer Research $w MED00000478 $g Roč. 28, č. 4B (2008), s. 2189-2195
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b x $y 7
- 990 __
- $a 20110413102152 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20110413102152 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 831067 $s 695672
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2008 $b 28 $c 4B $d 2189-2195 $i 0250-7005 $m Anticancer research $n Anticancer Res $x MED00000478
- LZP __
- $a 2011-3B/vtme