Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Comparison of 111In-DOTA-NOC and 111I-DOTA-TATE distribution in the target and dose-limiting tissues: conflicting results in vitro and in vivo

J Cihlo, L Melicharova, M Petrik, A Laznickova, M Laznicek

. 2008 ; 28 (4B) : 2189-2195.

Language English Country Greece

Document type Comparative Study

E-resources Online

NLK Free Medical Journals from 2004 to 2 years ago
Open Access Digital Library from 2004-01-01

BACKGROUND: In this study, some important biological characteristics of two radiolabelled somatostatin analogues 111In-DOTA-1-Nal3-octreotide (DOTA-NOC) and 111In-DOTA-Tyr3-octreotate (DOTA-TATE) were compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rats were used for in vivo biodistribution experiments and in vitro cell models (OK and AR42J cell lines) were used for simulating the internalization in the kidney and in subtype 2 somatostatin receptor (SSTR2)-positive tissues, respectively. RESULTS: Significantly higher radioactivity concentrations in rat organs with high density of somatostatin receptors after 111In-DOTA-NOC administration in comparison with 111In-DOTA-TATE were observed. The predominant urine excretion was associated with accumulation of the radioactivity in the kidney, where higher retention of 111In-DOTA-TATE compared to 111In-DOTA-NOC was detected. In the OK cell line the opposite results were found. No significant differences in the in vitro internalization and externalization of radioactivity to AR42J cell line were found for either peptide suggesting their same affinity for SSTR2. CONCLUSION: Preclinical experiments indicated that 111In-DOTA-NOC is a very promising peptide for somatostatin receptor-positive tumour visualization. The conflict between the in vitro and in vivo kidney handling showed that the transfer of results from in vitro to in vivo conditions and their interpretation should be performed very carefully because both types of experiments can be affected by different factors, making their simple comparison difficult.

000      
02086naa 2200481 a 4500
001      
bmc11003651
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20111210202357.0
008      
110302s2008 gr e eng||
009      
AR
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gr
100    1_
$a Cihlo, Jan. $7 xx0238217
245    10
$a Comparison of 111In-DOTA-NOC and 111I-DOTA-TATE distribution in the target and dose-limiting tissues: conflicting results in vitro and in vivo / $c J Cihlo, L Melicharova, M Petrik, A Laznickova, M Laznicek
314    __
$a Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: In this study, some important biological characteristics of two radiolabelled somatostatin analogues 111In-DOTA-1-Nal3-octreotide (DOTA-NOC) and 111In-DOTA-Tyr3-octreotate (DOTA-TATE) were compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rats were used for in vivo biodistribution experiments and in vitro cell models (OK and AR42J cell lines) were used for simulating the internalization in the kidney and in subtype 2 somatostatin receptor (SSTR2)-positive tissues, respectively. RESULTS: Significantly higher radioactivity concentrations in rat organs with high density of somatostatin receptors after 111In-DOTA-NOC administration in comparison with 111In-DOTA-TATE were observed. The predominant urine excretion was associated with accumulation of the radioactivity in the kidney, where higher retention of 111In-DOTA-TATE compared to 111In-DOTA-NOC was detected. In the OK cell line the opposite results were found. No significant differences in the in vitro internalization and externalization of radioactivity to AR42J cell line were found for either peptide suggesting their same affinity for SSTR2. CONCLUSION: Preclinical experiments indicated that 111In-DOTA-NOC is a very promising peptide for somatostatin receptor-positive tumour visualization. The conflict between the in vitro and in vivo kidney handling showed that the transfer of results from in vitro to in vivo conditions and their interpretation should be performed very carefully because both types of experiments can be affected by different factors, making their simple comparison difficult.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a buněčné linie $7 D002460
650    _2
$a nádorové buněčné linie $7 D045744
650    _2
$a vysokoúčinná kapalinová chromatografie $7 D002851
650    _2
$a radioizotopy india $7 D007205
650    _2
$a ledvinové kanálky $x metabolismus $7 D007684
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a oktreotid $x analogy a deriváty $x farmakokinetika $x chemie $7 D015282
650    _2
$a vačicovití $7 D009893
650    _2
$a organokovové sloučeniny $x farmakokinetika $x chemie $7 D009942
650    _2
$a nádory slinivky břišní $x metabolismus $7 D010190
650    _2
$a radiofarmaka $x farmakokinetika $7 D019275
650    _2
$a krysa rodu Rattus $7 D051381
650    _2
$a potkani Wistar $7 D017208
650    _2
$a receptory somatostatinu $x metabolismus $7 D017481
650    _2
$a tkáňová distribuce $7 D014018
650    _2
$a financování organizované $7 D005381
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
700    1_
$a Melicharová, Ludmila, $d 1962- $7 xx0105436
700    1_
$a Petřík, Miloš $7 xx0169395
700    1_
$a Lázníčková, Alice, $d 1948- $7 nlk19990073515
700    1_
$a Lázníček, Milan, $d 1947- $7 nlk19990073514
773    0_
$t Anticancer Research $w MED00000478 $g Roč. 28, č. 4B (2008), s. 2189-2195
910    __
$a ABA008 $b x $y 7
990    __
$a 20110413102152 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20110413102152 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 831067 $s 695672
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2008 $b 28 $c 4B $d 2189-2195 $i 0250-7005 $m Anticancer research $n Anticancer Res $x MED00000478
LZP    __
$a 2011-3B/vtme

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...