• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Deproteinized bovine bone versus beta-tricalcium phosphate in sinus augmentation surgery: a comparative histologic and histomorphometric study

A Simunek, D Kopecka, RV Somanathan, S Pilathadka, T Brazda

. 2008 ; 23 (5) : 935-942.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, klinické zkoušky kontrolované

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc11005131

Grantová podpora
NK7711 MZ0 CEP - Centrální evidence projektů

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of 2 common materials in sinus augmentation surgery and to assess their contribution when enriched with autogenous bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prospective human study was performed in 48 sinus grafting operations using beta-tricalcium phosphate or deproteinized bovine bone (pure or mixed with 10% to 20% autogenous bone) or autogenous bone. Biopsy specimens were taken after 9 months. Statistical evaluation was done with a 2-sample t test (P < .05). RESULTS: When autogenous bone was used, 49.2% +/- 3.1% of new bone was found, which is significantly higher than in all the other groups. A higher proportion (34.2% +/- 13.1%) of the new vital bone was found in the deproteinized bovine bone group, in comparison with the beta-tricalcium phosphate group (21.4% +/- 8.1%) and the beta-tricalcium phosphate composite graft group (24.0% +/- 6.6%; P < .05). No significant differences between single-component grafts and corresponding composite grafts were established. CONCLUSIONS: Sinus augmentation with the aforementioned augmentation materials is a well-accepted procedure. However, autogenous bone alone was the best material. More new bone was found using deproteinized bovine bone than beta-tricalcium phosphate. The addition of 10% to 20% autogenous bone to the bone substitute did not significantly influence the new bone formation.

000      
01839naa 2200445 a 4500
001      
bmc11005131
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20121221094519.0
008      
110311s2008 xxu e eng||
009      
AR
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Šimůnek, Antonín, $d 1953- $7 nlk19990074122
245    10
$a Deproteinized bovine bone versus beta-tricalcium phosphate in sinus augmentation surgery: a comparative histologic and histomorphometric study / $c A Simunek, D Kopecka, RV Somanathan, S Pilathadka, T Brazda
314    __
$a Department of Dentistry, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. simunek@email.cz
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of 2 common materials in sinus augmentation surgery and to assess their contribution when enriched with autogenous bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prospective human study was performed in 48 sinus grafting operations using beta-tricalcium phosphate or deproteinized bovine bone (pure or mixed with 10% to 20% autogenous bone) or autogenous bone. Biopsy specimens were taken after 9 months. Statistical evaluation was done with a 2-sample t test (P < .05). RESULTS: When autogenous bone was used, 49.2% +/- 3.1% of new bone was found, which is significantly higher than in all the other groups. A higher proportion (34.2% +/- 13.1%) of the new vital bone was found in the deproteinized bovine bone group, in comparison with the beta-tricalcium phosphate group (21.4% +/- 8.1%) and the beta-tricalcium phosphate composite graft group (24.0% +/- 6.6%; P < .05). No significant differences between single-component grafts and corresponding composite grafts were established. CONCLUSIONS: Sinus augmentation with the aforementioned augmentation materials is a well-accepted procedure. However, autogenous bone alone was the best material. More new bone was found using deproteinized bovine bone than beta-tricalcium phosphate. The addition of 10% to 20% autogenous bone to the bone substitute did not significantly influence the new bone formation.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a regenerace kostí $7 D001861
650    _2
$a kostní náhrady $7 D018786
650    _2
$a transplantace kostí $7 D016025
650    _2
$a fosforečnany vápenaté $7 D002130
650    _2
$a skot $7 D002417
650    _2
$a průřezové studie $7 D003430
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a sinus maxillaris $x chirurgie $7 D008443
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a minerály $7 D008903
650    _2
$a stomatochirurgické předprotetické výkony $x metody $7 D013516
650    _2
$a financování organizované $7 D005381
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky kontrolované $7 D018848
700    1_
$a Kopecká, Dana $7 xx0082714
700    1_
$a Somanathan, Rakesh V.
700    1_
$a Pilathadka, Shriharsha. $7 _BN005210
700    1_
$a Brázda, Tomáš, $d 1979- $7 xx0131066
773    0_
$t International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants $w MED00008478 $g Roč. 23, č. 5 (2008), s. 935-942 $x 0882-2786
910    __
$a ABA008 $b x $y 1
990    __
$a 20110414094751 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20121221094603 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 832970 $s 697181
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2008 $b 23 $c 5 $d 935-942 $i 0882-2786 $m The International journal of oral and maxillofacial implants $n Int. j. oral maxillofac. implants $x MED00008478
GRA    __
$a NK7711 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a 2011-4B/vtme

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...