-
Something wrong with this record ?
Second harmonic atomic force microscopy imaging of live and fixed mammalian cells
A. Dulebo, J. Preiner, F. Kienberger, G. Kada, C. Rankl, L. Chtcheglova, C. Lamprecht, D. Kaftan, P. Hinterdorfer
Language English Country Netherlands
Document type Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Endothelial Cells ultrastructure MeSH
- Epithelial Cells MeSH
- Eukaryotic Cells MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Microscopy, Atomic Force methods MeSH
- Myocardium cytology MeSH
- Mice MeSH
- Lung cytology MeSH
- Elasticity MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Mice MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
Higher harmonic contributions in the movement of an oscillating atomic force microscopy (AFM) cantilever are generated by nonlinear tip-sample interactions, yielding additional information on structure and physical properties such as sample stiffness. Higher harmonic amplitudes are strongly enhanced in liquid compared to the operation in air, and were previously reported to result in better structural resolution in highly organized lattices of proteins in bacterial S-layers and viral capsids [J. Preiner, J. Tang, V. Pastushenko, P. Hinterdorfer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 046102]. We compared first and second harmonics AFM imaging of live and fixed human lung epithelial cells, and microvascular endothelial cells from mouse myocardium (MyEnd). Phase-distance cycles revealed that the second harmonic phase is 8 times more sensitive than the first harmonic phase with respect to variations in the distance between cantilever and sample surface. Frequency spectra were acquired at different positions on living and fixed cells with second harmonic amplitude values correlating with the sample stiffness. We conclude that variations in sample stiffness and corresponding changes in the cantilever-sample distance, latter effect caused by the finite feedback response, result in second harmonic images with improved contrast and information that is not attainable in the fundamental frequency of an oscillating cantilever.
- 000
- 02953naa 2200421 a 4500
- 001
- bmc11016830
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20121130095540.0
- 008
- 110628s2009 ne e eng||
- 009
- AR
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Dulebo, Alexander. $7 _AN066345
- 245 10
- $a Second harmonic atomic force microscopy imaging of live and fixed mammalian cells / $c A. Dulebo, J. Preiner, F. Kienberger, G. Kada, C. Rankl, L. Chtcheglova, C. Lamprecht, D. Kaftan, P. Hinterdorfer
- 314 __
- $a Institute of Physical Biology, University of South Bohemia, Zamek 136, 37333 Nove Hrady, Czech Republic.
- 520 9_
- $a Higher harmonic contributions in the movement of an oscillating atomic force microscopy (AFM) cantilever are generated by nonlinear tip-sample interactions, yielding additional information on structure and physical properties such as sample stiffness. Higher harmonic amplitudes are strongly enhanced in liquid compared to the operation in air, and were previously reported to result in better structural resolution in highly organized lattices of proteins in bacterial S-layers and viral capsids [J. Preiner, J. Tang, V. Pastushenko, P. Hinterdorfer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 046102]. We compared first and second harmonics AFM imaging of live and fixed human lung epithelial cells, and microvascular endothelial cells from mouse myocardium (MyEnd). Phase-distance cycles revealed that the second harmonic phase is 8 times more sensitive than the first harmonic phase with respect to variations in the distance between cantilever and sample surface. Frequency spectra were acquired at different positions on living and fixed cells with second harmonic amplitude values correlating with the sample stiffness. We conclude that variations in sample stiffness and corresponding changes in the cantilever-sample distance, latter effect caused by the finite feedback response, result in second harmonic images with improved contrast and information that is not attainable in the fundamental frequency of an oscillating cantilever.
- 590 __
- $a bohemika - dle Pubmed
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a pružnost $7 D004548
- 650 _2
- $a endoteliální buňky $x ultrastruktura $7 D042783
- 650 _2
- $a epitelové buňky $7 D004847
- 650 _2
- $a eukaryotické buňky $7 D005057
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a plíce $x cytologie $7 D008168
- 650 _2
- $a myši $7 D051379
- 650 _2
- $a mikroskopie atomárních sil $x metody $7 D018625
- 650 _2
- $a myokard $x cytologie $7 D009206
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Preiner, Johannes
- 700 1_
- $a Kienberger, Ferry
- 700 1_
- $a Kada, Gerald
- 700 1_
- $a Rankl, Christian
- 700 1_
- $a Chtcheglova, Lilia
- 700 1_
- $a Lamprecht, Constanze
- 700 1_
- $a Kaftan, David. $7 _AN063435
- 700 1_
- $a Hinterdorfer, Peter
- 773 0_
- $t Ultramicroscopy $w MED00004596 $g Roč. 109, č. 8 (2009), s. 1056-1060
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b x $y 2
- 990 __
- $a 20110720122136 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20121130095609 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 864087 $s 726622
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2009 $x MED00004596 $b 109 $c 8 $d 1056-1060 $m Ultramicroscopy $n Ultramicroscopy
- LZP __
- $a 2011-3B09/BBjvme