Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Injekce anestetika s kortikoidem při řešení bolestí sakroilických kloubů po lumbálních stabilizacích
[Injection of anaesthetic-corticosteroid to relieve sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar stabilisation]

R. Hart, P. Wendsche, J. Kočiš, M. Komzák, F. Okál, J. Krejzla

Jazyk čeština Země Česko

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc11035245

Digitální knihovna NLK
Zdroj

E-zdroje

NLK Free Medical Journals od 2006

Both the range of motion and load transfer of the sacroiliac (SI) joint improve considerably after lumbar spine surgery. When, following surgery, SI joint pain develops in spite of appropriate physical therapy, injection of an anaesthetic with added corticosteroid into the SI joint is a first choice treatment. The aim of this presentation is to provide information on our experience with this therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Thirty-four patients after lumbar spine fusion reported lumbalgia different form pain before surgery. In 14 (41 %) of them, pain in one of the SI joints was diagnosed as the cause. This group included 12 women and two men at an average age of 56 (range, 47 to 68) years. Ten patients underwent lumbosacral fixation and four had segmental ("floating") lumbar spine fusion. All patients experienced lumbalgia at more than 3 months following surgery, at 8 months on the average (range, 4 to 12 months). None of them had SI joint pain before surgery. The diagnosis was based on specific manoeuvres on physical examination of the joint. Each patient was given an injection of 20 mg (0.5 ml) Methylprednisolone (Depo-Medrol?, Pfizer, Puurs, Belgium) and 4.5 ml 1% Mesocain (Zentiva, Praha, CR).They were inquired as to pain relief 24 h later and then at 1, 3 and 6 months after injection. Subjective feelings were assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS). The results were analysed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS All patients reported pain relief within 24 h of injection, but not its complete resolution. The average VAS score before and after the blockage of the SI joint was 9.1 points (8-10) and 4.8 points (2-7), respectively; this implies improvement by an average of 4.3 points (1-6), i.e., approximately by 47.3% (12.5-62.5). The duration of effects varied greatly from patient to patient. The average interval between injection and pain recurrence lasted for 5 weeks (1 -28). Most frequently, relief was experienced for 2 weeks, or for 6.8 weeks with the standard deviation included. DISCUSSION Sacroiliac joint dysfunction is a very frequent cause of lumbalgia, particularly after lumbar spine surgery. Physical therapy may not always be effective. SI joint arthrodesis is indicated only in rare cases. One of the few possibilities of pain relief involves intra-articular injection of an anaesthetic with corticosteroid for booster effect. The treatment of SI joint blockage after spinal fusion has recently been dealt with in three reports in the international literature; their conclusions are in accordance with the results of this study. CONCLUSIONS Lumbar spine stabilisation surgery may result in overloading the SI joints as the "adjacent segments". An intra-articular injection of anaesthetic can be considered a reliable method for ascertaining the SI joint as the source of a patient's problems. However, even with corticosteroid added, pain relief is not usually long-lasting.

Injection of anaesthetic-corticosteroid to relieve sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar stabilisation

Bibliografie atd.

Lit.: 17

000      
00000naa 2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc11035245
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20120319131041.0
008      
110927s2011 xr e cze||
009      
AR
024    7_
$2 doi $a 10.55095/achot2011/052
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a cze $b eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Hart, Radek, $d 1967- $7 xx0010068
245    10
$a Injekce anestetika s kortikoidem při řešení bolestí sakroilických kloubů po lumbálních stabilizacích / $c R. Hart, P. Wendsche, J. Kočiš, M. Komzák, F. Okál, J. Krejzla
246    11
$a Injection of anaesthetic-corticosteroid to relieve sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar stabilisation
314    __
$a Ortopedicko-traumatologické oddělení Nemocnice Znojmo
504    __
$a Lit.: 17
520    9_
$a Both the range of motion and load transfer of the sacroiliac (SI) joint improve considerably after lumbar spine surgery. When, following surgery, SI joint pain develops in spite of appropriate physical therapy, injection of an anaesthetic with added corticosteroid into the SI joint is a first choice treatment. The aim of this presentation is to provide information on our experience with this therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Thirty-four patients after lumbar spine fusion reported lumbalgia different form pain before surgery. In 14 (41 %) of them, pain in one of the SI joints was diagnosed as the cause. This group included 12 women and two men at an average age of 56 (range, 47 to 68) years. Ten patients underwent lumbosacral fixation and four had segmental ("floating") lumbar spine fusion. All patients experienced lumbalgia at more than 3 months following surgery, at 8 months on the average (range, 4 to 12 months). None of them had SI joint pain before surgery. The diagnosis was based on specific manoeuvres on physical examination of the joint. Each patient was given an injection of 20 mg (0.5 ml) Methylprednisolone (Depo-Medrol?, Pfizer, Puurs, Belgium) and 4.5 ml 1% Mesocain (Zentiva, Praha, CR).They were inquired as to pain relief 24 h later and then at 1, 3 and 6 months after injection. Subjective feelings were assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS). The results were analysed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS All patients reported pain relief within 24 h of injection, but not its complete resolution. The average VAS score before and after the blockage of the SI joint was 9.1 points (8-10) and 4.8 points (2-7), respectively; this implies improvement by an average of 4.3 points (1-6), i.e., approximately by 47.3% (12.5-62.5). The duration of effects varied greatly from patient to patient. The average interval between injection and pain recurrence lasted for 5 weeks (1 -28). Most frequently, relief was experienced for 2 weeks, or for 6.8 weeks with the standard deviation included. DISCUSSION Sacroiliac joint dysfunction is a very frequent cause of lumbalgia, particularly after lumbar spine surgery. Physical therapy may not always be effective. SI joint arthrodesis is indicated only in rare cases. One of the few possibilities of pain relief involves intra-articular injection of an anaesthetic with corticosteroid for booster effect. The treatment of SI joint blockage after spinal fusion has recently been dealt with in three reports in the international literature; their conclusions are in accordance with the results of this study. CONCLUSIONS Lumbar spine stabilisation surgery may result in overloading the SI joints as the "adjacent segments". An intra-articular injection of anaesthetic can be considered a reliable method for ascertaining the SI joint as the source of a patient's problems. However, even with corticosteroid added, pain relief is not usually long-lasting.
650    02
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    02
$a anestetika lokální $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D000779
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a injekce intraartikulární $7 D007270
650    _2
$a lumbalgie $x terapie $7 D017116
650    _2
$a bederní obratle $x chirurgie $7 D008159
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a methylprednisolon $x analogy a deriváty $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D008775
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a měření bolesti $7 D010147
650    _2
$a sakroiliakální kloub $7 D012446
650    _2
$a fúze páteře $7 D013123
650    _2
$a trimekain $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D014288
700    1_
$a Wendsche, Peter, $d 1945- $7 mzk2002103163
700    1_
$a Kočiš, Ján $7 xx0081819
700    1_
$a Komzák, Martin. $7 xx0231327
700    1_
$a Okál, František $7 xx0115212
700    1_
$a Krejzla, Jaroslav $7 xx0102249
773    0_
$w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae čechoslovaca $g Roč. 78, č. 4 (2011), s. 339-342 $x 0001-5415
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y 2
990    __
$a 20110927082703 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20120319131025 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 880570 $s 745369
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2011 $b 78 $c 4 $d 339-342 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021
LZP    __
$a 2011-18/mkme

Najít záznam