-
Something wrong with this record ?
Endoscopic versus bridging technique of saphenous vein graft harvesting - one-year results
Vojtěch Kurfirst, Julia Čanádyová, Aleš Mokráček
Language English Country Czech Republic
- Keywords
- ranné komplikace,
- MeSH
- Lower Extremity surgery MeSH
- Endoscopy methods utilization MeSH
- Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures methods utilization MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures methods utilization MeSH
- Tissue and Organ Harvesting classification methods utilization MeSH
- Postoperative Complications prevention & control MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Surveys and Questionnaires MeSH
- Myocardial Revascularization methods utilization MeSH
- Patient Satisfaction MeSH
- Statistics as Topic MeSH
- Transplants utilization MeSH
- Saphenous Vein transplantation MeSH
- Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
Aim/objective Prospective study comparing objective and subjective parameters of patients undergoing myocardial revascularization surgery. Venous graft were harvested by both endoscopic and the bridging method. Methodology In the period from 01/2009 to 03/2010, we performed 45 combined harvests of v. saphena magna using the endoscopic and bridging method. Patients went through an ambulatory control of wound complications after one week and after one month. Another inspection was carried out by telephone after three months when the patients completed a short questionnaire. After one year, details of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were collected. The agreement of patients was obtained prior to their participation in this study. Results The average age of patients was 66.3 years (55–84), the average BMI was 28.9 (24.1–36.6) and in the observed group men predominated (77.8%). Diabetes was present in 24.4%, varicose of lower extremities in 20% and peripheral arterial occlusive disease in 11.1% of patients. The average length of harvested vein, the velocity of harvest and the number of sutured defects per vein were quite similar. Early complications occurred in a total of 5 patients (11.1%), after completion of the endoscopic harvest in 1 patient (2.2%) and after the bridging harvest in 4 patients (8.9%). In the questionnaire completed three months after the surgery patients mentioned less pain, better cosmetic results and greater overall satisfaction in the endoscopic harvest (75.6% of patients). If patients had had the choice, in most cases (88.9%) they would have preferred the endoscopic harvest to the bridging technique harvest. For the vast majority of respondents (93.3%) a scar on the chest and a scar on the lower extremities after harvesting of vein grafts are equal from a cosmetic point of view. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were reported over one year in 8.9% of patients. Conclusions Comparing the two minimally invasive techniques (endoscopic and bridging) in the selected group of patients we have demonstrated a lower incidence of wound complications and greater patient satisfaction with endoscopic harvesting methods. Both of these minimally invasive methods are safe for the patients, which were demonstrated by low occurrence of MACCE.
Obsahuje tabulky
Bibliography, etc.Literatura
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12016590
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20150827104138.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120526s2012 xr f 000 0eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $2 doi $a 10.1016/j.crvasa.2012.03.001
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2 $b cze
- 041 0_
- $a eng $b cze
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Kurfirst, Vojtěch. $7 xx0243560 $u Kardiochirurgické oddělení, Kardiocentrum Nemocnice České Budějovice a.s., České Budějovice
- 245 10
- $a Endoscopic versus bridging technique of saphenous vein graft harvesting - one-year results / $c Vojtěch Kurfirst, Julia Čanádyová, Aleš Mokráček
- 500 __
- $a Obsahuje tabulky
- 504 __
- $a Literatura $b 10
- 520 __
- $a Aim/objective Prospective study comparing objective and subjective parameters of patients undergoing myocardial revascularization surgery. Venous graft were harvested by both endoscopic and the bridging method. Methodology In the period from 01/2009 to 03/2010, we performed 45 combined harvests of v. saphena magna using the endoscopic and bridging method. Patients went through an ambulatory control of wound complications after one week and after one month. Another inspection was carried out by telephone after three months when the patients completed a short questionnaire. After one year, details of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were collected. The agreement of patients was obtained prior to their participation in this study. Results The average age of patients was 66.3 years (55–84), the average BMI was 28.9 (24.1–36.6) and in the observed group men predominated (77.8%). Diabetes was present in 24.4%, varicose of lower extremities in 20% and peripheral arterial occlusive disease in 11.1% of patients. The average length of harvested vein, the velocity of harvest and the number of sutured defects per vein were quite similar. Early complications occurred in a total of 5 patients (11.1%), after completion of the endoscopic harvest in 1 patient (2.2%) and after the bridging harvest in 4 patients (8.9%). In the questionnaire completed three months after the surgery patients mentioned less pain, better cosmetic results and greater overall satisfaction in the endoscopic harvest (75.6% of patients). If patients had had the choice, in most cases (88.9%) they would have preferred the endoscopic harvest to the bridging technique harvest. For the vast majority of respondents (93.3%) a scar on the chest and a scar on the lower extremities after harvesting of vein grafts are equal from a cosmetic point of view. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were reported over one year in 8.9% of patients. Conclusions Comparing the two minimally invasive techniques (endoscopic and bridging) in the selected group of patients we have demonstrated a lower incidence of wound complications and greater patient satisfaction with endoscopic harvesting methods. Both of these minimally invasive methods are safe for the patients, which were demonstrated by low occurrence of MACCE.
- 650 _2
- $a vena saphena $x transplantace $7 D012501
- 650 _2
- $a transplantáty $x využití $7 D019737
- 650 _2
- $a odběr tkání a orgánů $x klasifikace $x metody $x využití $7 D020858
- 650 _2
- $a revaskularizace myokardu $x metody $x využití $7 D009204
- 650 _2
- $a miniinvazivní chirurgické výkony $x metody $x využití $7 D019060
- 650 _2
- $a endoskopie $x metody $x využití $7 D004724
- 650 _2
- $a kardiovaskulární chirurgické výkony $x metody $x využití $7 D013504
- 650 _2
- $a pooperační komplikace $x prevence a kontrola $7 D011183
- 650 _2
- $a dolní končetina $x chirurgie $7 D035002
- 650 _2
- $a spokojenost pacientů $7 D017060
- 650 _2
- $a výsledky a postupy - zhodnocení (zdravotní péče) $7 D010043
- 650 _2
- $a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
- 650 _2
- $a statistika jako téma $7 D013223
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 653 00
- $a ranné komplikace
- 700 1_
- $a Čanádyová, Júlia $7 xx0146244 $u Kardiochirurgické oddělení, Kardiocentrum Nemocnice České Budějovice a.s., České Budějovice
- 700 1_
- $a Mokráček, Aleš, $d 1966- $7 xx0094268 $u Kardiochirurgické oddělení, Kardiocentrum Nemocnice České Budějovice a.s., České Budějovice
- 773 0_
- $t Cor et vasa $x 0010-8650 $g Roč. 54, č. 3-4 [2] (2012), s. 136-139 (e e93-e96) $w MED00010972
- 856 41
- $u https://e-coretvasa.cz/pdfs/cor/2012/03/17.pdf $y plný text volně přístupný
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 2980 $c 438 $y 2 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20120525070902 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20150827104253 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 910382 $s 773732
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2012 $b 54 $c 3-4 $g 2 $d 136-139 $f e93-e96 $i 0010-8650 $m Cor et Vasa (Brno) $n Cor Vasa (Brno Print) $x MED00010972
- LZP __
- $a 2012-23/vtal