Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Endoscopic versus bridging technique of saphenous vein graft harvesting - one-year results

Vojtěch Kurfirst, Julia Čanádyová, Aleš Mokráček

. 2012 ; 54 (3-4) : 136-139. [epub] 2 : e93-e96

Language English Country Czech Republic

Aim/objective Prospective study comparing objective and subjective parameters of patients undergoing myocardial revascularization surgery. Venous graft were harvested by both endoscopic and the bridging method. Methodology In the period from 01/2009 to 03/2010, we performed 45 combined harvests of v. saphena magna using the endoscopic and bridging method. Patients went through an ambulatory control of wound complications after one week and after one month. Another inspection was carried out by telephone after three months when the patients completed a short questionnaire. After one year, details of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were collected. The agreement of patients was obtained prior to their participation in this study. Results The average age of patients was 66.3 years (55–84), the average BMI was 28.9 (24.1–36.6) and in the observed group men predominated (77.8%). Diabetes was present in 24.4%, varicose of lower extremities in 20% and peripheral arterial occlusive disease in 11.1% of patients. The average length of harvested vein, the velocity of harvest and the number of sutured defects per vein were quite similar. Early complications occurred in a total of 5 patients (11.1%), after completion of the endoscopic harvest in 1 patient (2.2%) and after the bridging harvest in 4 patients (8.9%). In the questionnaire completed three months after the surgery patients mentioned less pain, better cosmetic results and greater overall satisfaction in the endoscopic harvest (75.6% of patients). If patients had had the choice, in most cases (88.9%) they would have preferred the endoscopic harvest to the bridging technique harvest. For the vast majority of respondents (93.3%) a scar on the chest and a scar on the lower extremities after harvesting of vein grafts are equal from a cosmetic point of view. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were reported over one year in 8.9% of patients. Conclusions Comparing the two minimally invasive techniques (endoscopic and bridging) in the selected group of patients we have demonstrated a lower incidence of wound complications and greater patient satisfaction with endoscopic harvesting methods. Both of these minimally invasive methods are safe for the patients, which were demonstrated by low occurrence of MACCE.

Obsahuje tabulky

Bibliography, etc.

Literatura

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12016590
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20150827104138.0
007      
ta
008      
120526s2012 xr f 000 0eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$2 doi $a 10.1016/j.crvasa.2012.03.001
040    __
$a ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2 $b cze
041    0_
$a eng $b cze
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Kurfirst, Vojtěch. $7 xx0243560 $u Kardiochirurgické oddělení, Kardiocentrum Nemocnice České Budějovice a.s., České Budějovice
245    10
$a Endoscopic versus bridging technique of saphenous vein graft harvesting - one-year results / $c Vojtěch Kurfirst, Julia Čanádyová, Aleš Mokráček
500    __
$a Obsahuje tabulky
504    __
$a Literatura $b 10
520    __
$a Aim/objective Prospective study comparing objective and subjective parameters of patients undergoing myocardial revascularization surgery. Venous graft were harvested by both endoscopic and the bridging method. Methodology In the period from 01/2009 to 03/2010, we performed 45 combined harvests of v. saphena magna using the endoscopic and bridging method. Patients went through an ambulatory control of wound complications after one week and after one month. Another inspection was carried out by telephone after three months when the patients completed a short questionnaire. After one year, details of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were collected. The agreement of patients was obtained prior to their participation in this study. Results The average age of patients was 66.3 years (55–84), the average BMI was 28.9 (24.1–36.6) and in the observed group men predominated (77.8%). Diabetes was present in 24.4%, varicose of lower extremities in 20% and peripheral arterial occlusive disease in 11.1% of patients. The average length of harvested vein, the velocity of harvest and the number of sutured defects per vein were quite similar. Early complications occurred in a total of 5 patients (11.1%), after completion of the endoscopic harvest in 1 patient (2.2%) and after the bridging harvest in 4 patients (8.9%). In the questionnaire completed three months after the surgery patients mentioned less pain, better cosmetic results and greater overall satisfaction in the endoscopic harvest (75.6% of patients). If patients had had the choice, in most cases (88.9%) they would have preferred the endoscopic harvest to the bridging technique harvest. For the vast majority of respondents (93.3%) a scar on the chest and a scar on the lower extremities after harvesting of vein grafts are equal from a cosmetic point of view. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were reported over one year in 8.9% of patients. Conclusions Comparing the two minimally invasive techniques (endoscopic and bridging) in the selected group of patients we have demonstrated a lower incidence of wound complications and greater patient satisfaction with endoscopic harvesting methods. Both of these minimally invasive methods are safe for the patients, which were demonstrated by low occurrence of MACCE.
650    _2
$a vena saphena $x transplantace $7 D012501
650    _2
$a transplantáty $x využití $7 D019737
650    _2
$a odběr tkání a orgánů $x klasifikace $x metody $x využití $7 D020858
650    _2
$a revaskularizace myokardu $x metody $x využití $7 D009204
650    _2
$a miniinvazivní chirurgické výkony $x metody $x využití $7 D019060
650    _2
$a endoskopie $x metody $x využití $7 D004724
650    _2
$a kardiovaskulární chirurgické výkony $x metody $x využití $7 D013504
650    _2
$a pooperační komplikace $x prevence a kontrola $7 D011183
650    _2
$a dolní končetina $x chirurgie $7 D035002
650    _2
$a spokojenost pacientů $7 D017060
650    _2
$a výsledky a postupy - zhodnocení (zdravotní péče) $7 D010043
650    _2
$a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
650    _2
$a statistika jako téma $7 D013223
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
653    00
$a ranné komplikace
700    1_
$a Čanádyová, Júlia $7 xx0146244 $u Kardiochirurgické oddělení, Kardiocentrum Nemocnice České Budějovice a.s., České Budějovice
700    1_
$a Mokráček, Aleš, $d 1966- $7 xx0094268 $u Kardiochirurgické oddělení, Kardiocentrum Nemocnice České Budějovice a.s., České Budějovice
773    0_
$t Cor et vasa $x 0010-8650 $g Roč. 54, č. 3-4 [2] (2012), s. 136-139 (e e93-e96) $w MED00010972
856    41
$u https://e-coretvasa.cz/pdfs/cor/2012/03/17.pdf $y plný text volně přístupný
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 2980 $c 438 $y 2 $z 0
990    __
$a 20120525070902 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20150827104253 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 910382 $s 773732
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2012 $b 54 $c 3-4 $g 2 $d 136-139 $f e93-e96 $i 0010-8650 $m Cor et Vasa (Brno) $n Cor Vasa (Brno Print) $x MED00010972
LZP    __
$a 2012-23/vtal

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...