-
Something wrong with this record ?
How a neutral evolutionary ratchet can build cellular complexity
J. Lukeš, JM. Archibald, PJ. Keeling, WF. Doolittle, MW. Gray
Language English Country Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review
PubMed
21698757
DOI
10.1002/iub.489
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Biological Evolution MeSH
- RNA Editing MeSH
- Adaptation, Physiological MeSH
- Genetic Drift MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Models, Genetic MeSH
- Plants anatomy & histology genetics metabolism MeSH
- RNA Splicing MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Review MeSH
Complex cellular machines and processes are commonly believed to be products of selection, and it is typically understood to be the job of evolutionary biologists to show how selective advantage can account for each step in their origin and subsequent growth in complexity. Here, we describe how complex machines might instead evolve in the absence of positive selection through a process of "presuppression," first termed constructive neutral evolution (CNE) more than a decade ago. If an autonomously functioning cellular component acquires mutations that make it dependent for function on another, pre-existing component or process, and if there are multiple ways in which such dependence may arise, then dependence inevitably will arise and reversal to independence is unlikely. Thus, CNE is a unidirectional evolutionary ratchet leading to complexity, if complexity is equated with the number of components or steps necessary to carry out a cellular process. CNE can explain "functions" that seem to make little sense in terms of cellular economy, like RNA editing or splicing, but it may also contribute to the complexity of machines with clear benefit to the cell, like the ribosome, and to organismal complexity overall. We suggest that CNE-based evolutionary scenarios are in these and other cases less forced than the selectionist or adaptationist narratives that are generally told.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12022328
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160426083224.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120806s2011 xxk f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/iub.489 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)21698757
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Lukeš, Julius, $d 1963- $7 xx0048510 $u Biology Centre, Institute of Parasitology, Czech Academy of Sciences, and Faculty of Sciences, University of South Bohemia, České Budĕjovice (Budweis), Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a How a neutral evolutionary ratchet can build cellular complexity / $c J. Lukeš, JM. Archibald, PJ. Keeling, WF. Doolittle, MW. Gray
- 520 9_
- $a Complex cellular machines and processes are commonly believed to be products of selection, and it is typically understood to be the job of evolutionary biologists to show how selective advantage can account for each step in their origin and subsequent growth in complexity. Here, we describe how complex machines might instead evolve in the absence of positive selection through a process of "presuppression," first termed constructive neutral evolution (CNE) more than a decade ago. If an autonomously functioning cellular component acquires mutations that make it dependent for function on another, pre-existing component or process, and if there are multiple ways in which such dependence may arise, then dependence inevitably will arise and reversal to independence is unlikely. Thus, CNE is a unidirectional evolutionary ratchet leading to complexity, if complexity is equated with the number of components or steps necessary to carry out a cellular process. CNE can explain "functions" that seem to make little sense in terms of cellular economy, like RNA editing or splicing, but it may also contribute to the complexity of machines with clear benefit to the cell, like the ribosome, and to organismal complexity overall. We suggest that CNE-based evolutionary scenarios are in these and other cases less forced than the selectionist or adaptationist narratives that are generally told.
- 650 _2
- $a fyziologická adaptace $7 D000222
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a biologická evoluce $7 D005075
- 650 _2
- $a genetický drift $7 D040961
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a modely genetické $7 D008957
- 650 _2
- $a rostliny $x anatomie a histologie $x genetika $x metabolismus $7 D010944
- 650 _2
- $a editace RNA $7 D017393
- 650 _2
- $a sestřih RNA $7 D012326
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Archibald, John M. $7 gn_A_00008388
- 700 1_
- $a Keeling, Patrick J.
- 700 1_
- $a Doolittle, W. Ford
- 700 1_
- $a Gray, Michael W.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006206 $t IUBMB life $x 1521-6551 $g Roč. 63, č. 7 (2011), s. 528-537
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21698757 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20120806 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160426083317 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 944241 $s 779625
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2011 $b 63 $c 7 $d 528-537 $i 1521-6551 $m IUBMB life $n IUBMB Life $x MED00006206
- LZP __
- $b NLK111 $a Pubmed-20120806/12/01