Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Alien plants introduced by different pathways differ in invasion success: unintentional introductions as a threat to natural areas

P. Pyšek, V. Jarošík, J. Pergl,

. 2011 ; 6 (9) : e24890. [pub] 20110915

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

BACKGROUND: Understanding the dimensions of pathways of introduction of alien plants is important for regulating species invasions, but how particular pathways differ in terms of post-invasion success of species they deliver has never been rigorously tested. We asked whether invasion status, distribution and habitat range of 1,007 alien plant species introduced after 1500 A.D. to the Czech Republic differ among four basic pathways of introduction recognized for plants. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Pathways introducing alien species deliberately as commodities (direct release into the wild; escape from cultivation) result in easier naturalization and invasion than pathways of unintentional introduction (contaminant of a commodity; stowaway arriving without association with it). The proportion of naturalized and invasive species among all introductions delivered by a particular pathway decreases with a decreasing level of direct assistance from humans associated with that pathway, from release and escape to contaminant and stowaway. However, those species that are introduced via unintentional pathways and become invasive are as widely distributed as deliberately introduced species, and those introduced as contaminants invade an even wider range of seminatural habitats. CONCLUSIONS: Pathways associated with deliberate species introductions with commodities and pathways whereby species are unintentionally introduced are contrasting modes of introductions in terms of invasion success. However, various measures of the outcome of the invasion process, in terms of species' invasion success, need to be considered to accurately evaluate the role of and threat imposed by individual pathways. By employing various measures we show that invasions by unintentionally introduced plant species need to be considered by management as seriously as those introduced by horticulture, because they invade a wide range of seminatural habitats, hence representing even a greater threat to natural areas.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12022560
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201203120439.0
007      
ta
008      
120806s2011 xxu f 000 0#eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0024890 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)21949778
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Pyšek, Petr $u Department of Invasion Ecology, Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Průhonice, Czech Republic. pysek@ibot.cas.cz
245    10
$a Alien plants introduced by different pathways differ in invasion success: unintentional introductions as a threat to natural areas / $c P. Pyšek, V. Jarošík, J. Pergl,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Understanding the dimensions of pathways of introduction of alien plants is important for regulating species invasions, but how particular pathways differ in terms of post-invasion success of species they deliver has never been rigorously tested. We asked whether invasion status, distribution and habitat range of 1,007 alien plant species introduced after 1500 A.D. to the Czech Republic differ among four basic pathways of introduction recognized for plants. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Pathways introducing alien species deliberately as commodities (direct release into the wild; escape from cultivation) result in easier naturalization and invasion than pathways of unintentional introduction (contaminant of a commodity; stowaway arriving without association with it). The proportion of naturalized and invasive species among all introductions delivered by a particular pathway decreases with a decreasing level of direct assistance from humans associated with that pathway, from release and escape to contaminant and stowaway. However, those species that are introduced via unintentional pathways and become invasive are as widely distributed as deliberately introduced species, and those introduced as contaminants invade an even wider range of seminatural habitats. CONCLUSIONS: Pathways associated with deliberate species introductions with commodities and pathways whereby species are unintentionally introduced are contrasting modes of introductions in terms of invasion success. However, various measures of the outcome of the invasion process, in terms of species' invasion success, need to be considered to accurately evaluate the role of and threat imposed by individual pathways. By employing various measures we show that invasions by unintentionally introduced plant species need to be considered by management as seriously as those introduced by horticulture, because they invade a wide range of seminatural habitats, hence representing even a greater threat to natural areas.
650    _2
$a zemědělství $7 D000383
650    _2
$a zachování přírodních zdrojů $7 D003247
650    _2
$a ekosystém $7 D017753
650    _2
$a zavlečené druhy $7 D058865
650    _2
$a lineární modely $7 D016014
650    _2
$a rostliny $7 D010944
650    _2
$a kvantitativní znak dědičný $7 D019655
650    _2
$a druhová specificita $7 D013045
650    _2
$a časové faktory $7 D013997
650    _2
$a vývoj rostlin $7 D063245
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Jarošík, Vojtěch, $d 1958-2013 $7 mzk2005318031
700    1_
$a Pergl, Jan
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 6, č. 9 (2011), s. e24890
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21949778 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m $z 0
990    __
$a 20120806 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201203120437 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 944473 $s 779857
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2011 $b 6 $c 9 $d e24890 $e 20110915 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20120806/12/01

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...