-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Attachments of muscles as landmarks for implantation of shoulder hemiarthoplasty in fractures
R. Hromádka, A.A. Kubena, D. Pokorný, S. Popelka, D. Jahoda, A. Sosna
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- analýza rozptylu MeSH
- anatomické modely MeSH
- artroplastiky kloubů metody MeSH
- biomechanika MeSH
- fraktury proximálního humeru radiografie chirurgie MeSH
- humerus anatomie a histologie chirurgie MeSH
- kosterní svaly anatomie a histologie chirurgie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- magnetická rezonanční tomografie MeSH
- počítačová rentgenová tomografie MeSH
- počítačové zpracování obrazu MeSH
- pravděpodobnost MeSH
- protetické vybavení MeSH
- protézy - design MeSH
- rotátorová manžeta anatomie a histologie radiografie MeSH
- zobrazování trojrozměrné MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: The attachments of muscles and the position of the humeral head are important for a good functional outcome of shoulder hemiarthroplasties after displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. Deviations in the attachments and changes in their spatial position with respect to the humeral head during surgical reconstruction change the biomechanics and reduce the range of motion of the should joint postoperatively. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used 198 humerus preparations and using 3-dimensional analysis measured the angular relationships between the humeral head axis and medial margin of the greater tuberosity (11.9 degrees +/- 9.1 degrees ), lateral margin of the lesser tuberosity (48.0 degrees +/- 7.8 degrees ), and the crest of the greater tuberosity (27.1 degrees +/- 9.6 degrees ). CONCLUSION: This study provides average values of the positions of the greater and lesser tuberosities with respect to the humeral head axis. We show that the greater and lesser tuberosities are more reliable than the transepicondylar line for reconstruction of humeral head retroversion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic Science.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12025568
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20200630131035.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120816s2010 xxu f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.jse.2009.03.023 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)19525130
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Hromádka, Rastislav, $d 1975- $7 xx0093688 $u 1(St) Orthopaedic Clinic, 1(St) Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic. rastislav.hromadka@lf1.cuni.cz
- 245 10
- $a Attachments of muscles as landmarks for implantation of shoulder hemiarthoplasty in fractures / $c R. Hromádka, A.A. Kubena, D. Pokorný, S. Popelka, D. Jahoda, A. Sosna
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: The attachments of muscles and the position of the humeral head are important for a good functional outcome of shoulder hemiarthroplasties after displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. Deviations in the attachments and changes in their spatial position with respect to the humeral head during surgical reconstruction change the biomechanics and reduce the range of motion of the should joint postoperatively. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used 198 humerus preparations and using 3-dimensional analysis measured the angular relationships between the humeral head axis and medial margin of the greater tuberosity (11.9 degrees +/- 9.1 degrees ), lateral margin of the lesser tuberosity (48.0 degrees +/- 7.8 degrees ), and the crest of the greater tuberosity (27.1 degrees +/- 9.6 degrees ). CONCLUSION: This study provides average values of the positions of the greater and lesser tuberosities with respect to the humeral head axis. We show that the greater and lesser tuberosities are more reliable than the transepicondylar line for reconstruction of humeral head retroversion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic Science.
- 650 _2
- $a analýza rozptylu $7 D000704
- 650 _2
- $a artroplastiky kloubů $x metody $7 D019643
- 650 _2
- $a biomechanika $7 D001696
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a humerus $x anatomie a histologie $x chirurgie $7 D006811
- 650 _2
- $a počítačové zpracování obrazu $7 D007091
- 650 _2
- $a zobrazování trojrozměrné $7 D021621
- 650 _2
- $a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $7 D008279
- 650 _2
- $a anatomické modely $7 D008953
- 650 _2
- $a kosterní svaly $x anatomie a histologie $x chirurgie $7 D018482
- 650 _2
- $a pravděpodobnost $7 D011336
- 650 _2
- $a protézy - design $7 D011474
- 650 _2
- $a protetické vybavení $7 D017755
- 650 _2
- $a rotátorová manžeta $x anatomie a histologie $x radiografie $7 D017006
- 650 _2
- $a fraktury proximálního humeru $x radiografie $x chirurgie $7 D012784
- 650 _2
- $a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $7 D014057
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Kuběna, Aleš $7 xx0108674
- 700 1_
- $a Pokorný, David, $d 1968- $7 jn20001103568
- 700 1_
- $a Popelka, Stanislav $7 xx0098390
- 700 1_
- $a Jahoda, David $7 xx0014721
- 700 1_
- $a Sosna, Antonín, $d 1943- $7 jn20000710566
- 773 0_
- $w MED00005004 $t Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons ... [et al.] $x 1532-6500 $g Roč. 19, č. 1 (2010), s. 130-136
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19525130 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20120816 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20200630131031 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 947610 $s 782914
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2010 $b 19 $c 1 $d 130-136 $i 1532-6500 $m Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery $n J Shoulder Elbow Surg $x MED00005004
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20120816/10/02