-
Something wrong with this record ?
Detection of photosynthetic herbicides: algal growth inhibition test vs. electrochemical photosystem II biosensor
J. Masojídek, P. Souček, J. Máchová, J. Frolík, K. Klem, J. Malý,
Language English Country United States
Document type Evaluation Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Atrazine toxicity MeSH
- Biosensing Techniques methods MeSH
- Time Factors MeSH
- Water Pollutants, Chemical toxicity MeSH
- Chlorophyta drug effects growth & development metabolism MeSH
- Diuron toxicity MeSH
- Phenylurea Compounds toxicity MeSH
- Photosynthesis drug effects MeSH
- Photosystem II Protein Complex antagonists & inhibitors metabolism MeSH
- Herbicides toxicity MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- Solutions chemistry MeSH
- Sensitivity and Specificity MeSH
- Toxicity Tests MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Evaluation Study MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
We compared a novel PSII-biosensor assay with a standard algal growth inhibition test for detection of photosynthetic herbicides--diuron, atrazine and isoproturon in liquid samples. To evaluate the convenience and sensitivity, values of the parameters EC50 and LOD and the duration of assays were compared. The biosensor assay was made with an electrochemical biosensor toxicity analyser with immobilised Photosystem II (PSII) complex. Using the PSII-biosensor assay, higher sensitivity (LOD) to herbicides (10(-8)-10(-9)M) was achieved as compared to standard algal growth inhibition tests (about 10(-7)M). The results of both assays showed a good correlation as concerns their EC50 values while the interval of detectable concentrations is about twice wider for PSII-biosensor. A proposed measurement protocol includes the reference standard of phytotoxicity (RSP). The main advantage of the PSII-biosensor assay is that it can be completed in about 1h and is by 1-2 orders more sensitive than standard algal growth inhibition test, which takes 72 h.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12026815
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20170410121731.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120816s2011 xxu f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2010.08.028 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)20828821
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Masojídek, Jiří $u Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Opatovický mlýn, CZ-37981 Třeboň, Czech Republic. klem@usbe.cas.cz $7 xx0103569
- 245 10
- $a Detection of photosynthetic herbicides: algal growth inhibition test vs. electrochemical photosystem II biosensor / $c J. Masojídek, P. Souček, J. Máchová, J. Frolík, K. Klem, J. Malý,
- 520 9_
- $a We compared a novel PSII-biosensor assay with a standard algal growth inhibition test for detection of photosynthetic herbicides--diuron, atrazine and isoproturon in liquid samples. To evaluate the convenience and sensitivity, values of the parameters EC50 and LOD and the duration of assays were compared. The biosensor assay was made with an electrochemical biosensor toxicity analyser with immobilised Photosystem II (PSII) complex. Using the PSII-biosensor assay, higher sensitivity (LOD) to herbicides (10(-8)-10(-9)M) was achieved as compared to standard algal growth inhibition tests (about 10(-7)M). The results of both assays showed a good correlation as concerns their EC50 values while the interval of detectable concentrations is about twice wider for PSII-biosensor. A proposed measurement protocol includes the reference standard of phytotoxicity (RSP). The main advantage of the PSII-biosensor assay is that it can be completed in about 1h and is by 1-2 orders more sensitive than standard algal growth inhibition test, which takes 72 h.
- 650 _2
- $a atrazin $x toxicita $7 D001280
- 650 _2
- $a biosenzitivní techniky $x metody $7 D015374
- 650 _2
- $a Chlorophyta $x účinky léků $x růst a vývoj $x metabolismus $7 D000460
- 650 _2
- $a diuron $x toxicita $7 D004237
- 650 _2
- $a herbicidy $x toxicita $7 D006540
- 650 _2
- $a fenylmočovinové sloučeniny $x toxicita $7 D010671
- 650 _2
- $a fotosyntéza $x účinky léků $7 D010788
- 650 _2
- $a fotosystém II (proteinový komplex) $x antagonisté a inhibitory $x metabolismus $7 D045332
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
- 650 _2
- $a roztoky $x chemie $7 D012996
- 650 _2
- $a časové faktory $7 D013997
- 650 _2
- $a testy toxicity $7 D018675
- 650 _2
- $a chemické látky znečišťující vodu $x toxicita $7 D014874
- 655 _2
- $a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Souček, Pavel $7 xx0060511
- 700 1_
- $a Máchová, Jana $7 _AN069786
- 700 1_
- $a Frolík, Jan
- 700 1_
- $a Klem, Karel
- 700 1_
- $a Malý, Jan, $d 1974- $7 xx0046638
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001478 $t Ecotoxicology and environmental safety $x 1090-2414 $g Roč. 74, č. 1 (2011), s. 117-122
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20828821 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20120816 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20170410122029 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 948857 $s 784161
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2011 $b 74 $c 1 $d 117-122 $i 1090-2414 $m Ecotoxicology and environmental safety $n Ecotoxicol Environ Safety $x MED00001478
- LZP __
- $b NLK113 $a Pubmed-20120816/11/01
