-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
(GTG)(5)-PCR fingerprinting of lactobacilli isolated from cervix of healthy women
P. Svec, I. Sedláček, M. Chrápavá, P. Vandamme
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko
Typ dokumentu hodnotící studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- cervix uteri mikrobiologie MeSH
- DNA bakterií genetika MeSH
- DNA fingerprinting metody MeSH
- DNA primery genetika MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- fylogeneze MeSH
- Lactobacillus klasifikace genetika izolace a purifikace MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- polymerázová řetězová reakce metody MeSH
- techniky typizace bakterií MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- hodnotící studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
A group of lactobacilli isolated from the cervix of 31 healthy women was characterized by (GTG)(5)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fingerprinting in order to evaluate this method for identification of vaginal lactobacilli. Obtained fingerprints were compared with profiles available in an in-house database of the CCM bacteria collection covering type and reference strains of multiple lactic acid bacteria including lactobacilli. Selected strains representing individual clusters were further identified by pheS gene sequencing. In total, six lactobacillus species were found among lactobacilli isolated from the cervix of healthy women. The (GTG)(5)-PCR method identified Lactobacillus gasseri (11 strains), Lactobacillus fermentum (one), and some of the Lactobacillus jensenii strains (eight out of 11), but failed to identify the remaining strains, including the Lactobacillus crispatus (18), Lactobacillus mucosae (one), and Lactobacillus vaginalis (one) species. L. jensenii strains were distributed over two fingerprint clusters. The majority of samples was dominated by one (GTG)(5)-PCR type. The rep-PCR fingerprinting using the (GTG)(5) primer allowed straightforward identification of many, but not all, isolates. This method has been shown to be a useful tool for fast screening and grouping of vaginal lactobacilli, but its combination with another identification method is needed to obtain reliable identification results. In addition, Lactobacillus acidophilus was not shown to be the most common inhabitant of the female genital tract as generally assumed.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12027745
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20151021093950.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120817s2011 xr d f 000 0eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s12223-011-0006-4 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)21390569
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Švec, Pavel $7 xx0050849 $u Czech Collection of Microorganisms, Department of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno
- 245 10
- $a (GTG)(5)-PCR fingerprinting of lactobacilli isolated from cervix of healthy women / $c P. Svec, I. Sedláček, M. Chrápavá, P. Vandamme
- 520 9_
- $a A group of lactobacilli isolated from the cervix of 31 healthy women was characterized by (GTG)(5)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fingerprinting in order to evaluate this method for identification of vaginal lactobacilli. Obtained fingerprints were compared with profiles available in an in-house database of the CCM bacteria collection covering type and reference strains of multiple lactic acid bacteria including lactobacilli. Selected strains representing individual clusters were further identified by pheS gene sequencing. In total, six lactobacillus species were found among lactobacilli isolated from the cervix of healthy women. The (GTG)(5)-PCR method identified Lactobacillus gasseri (11 strains), Lactobacillus fermentum (one), and some of the Lactobacillus jensenii strains (eight out of 11), but failed to identify the remaining strains, including the Lactobacillus crispatus (18), Lactobacillus mucosae (one), and Lactobacillus vaginalis (one) species. L. jensenii strains were distributed over two fingerprint clusters. The majority of samples was dominated by one (GTG)(5)-PCR type. The rep-PCR fingerprinting using the (GTG)(5) primer allowed straightforward identification of many, but not all, isolates. This method has been shown to be a useful tool for fast screening and grouping of vaginal lactobacilli, but its combination with another identification method is needed to obtain reliable identification results. In addition, Lactobacillus acidophilus was not shown to be the most common inhabitant of the female genital tract as generally assumed.
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a techniky typizace bakterií $7 D015373
- 650 _2
- $a cervix uteri $x mikrobiologie $7 D002584
- 650 _2
- $a DNA fingerprinting $x metody $7 D016172
- 650 _2
- $a DNA primery $x genetika $7 D017931
- 650 _2
- $a DNA bakterií $x genetika $7 D004269
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a Lactobacillus $x klasifikace $x genetika $x izolace a purifikace $7 D007778
- 650 _2
- $a fylogeneze $7 D010802
- 650 _2
- $a polymerázová řetězová reakce $x metody $7 D016133
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Sedláček, Ivo, $d 1958- $7 jx20040810004 $u Czech Collection of Microorganisms, Department of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno
- 700 1#
- $a Chrápavá, Marika. $7 xx0239826 $u Valosun Inc., Brno
- 700 1_
- $a Vandamme, P. $u Laboratory of Microbiology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- 773 0_
- $w MED00011005 $t Folia microbiologica $x 1874-9356 $g Roč. 56, č. 1 (2011), s. 80-83
- 856 41
- $u http://link.springer.com/journal/volumesAndIssues/12223 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $y m $b online $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20120817 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20151021094144 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 949787 $s 785091
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2011 $b 56 $c 1 $d 80-83 $i 1874-9356 $m Folia microbiologica $n Folia microbiol. (Prague) $x MED00011005
- LZP __
- $b NLK111 $a Pubmed-20120817/11/03