• Something wrong with this record ?

(GTG)(5)-PCR fingerprinting of lactobacilli isolated from cervix of healthy women

P. Svec, I. Sedláček, M. Chrápavá, P. Vandamme

. 2011 ; 56 (1) : 80-83.

Language English Country Czech Republic

Document type Evaluation Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc12027745

A group of lactobacilli isolated from the cervix of 31 healthy women was characterized by (GTG)(5)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fingerprinting in order to evaluate this method for identification of vaginal lactobacilli. Obtained fingerprints were compared with profiles available in an in-house database of the CCM bacteria collection covering type and reference strains of multiple lactic acid bacteria including lactobacilli. Selected strains representing individual clusters were further identified by pheS gene sequencing. In total, six lactobacillus species were found among lactobacilli isolated from the cervix of healthy women. The (GTG)(5)-PCR method identified Lactobacillus gasseri (11 strains), Lactobacillus fermentum (one), and some of the Lactobacillus jensenii strains (eight out of 11), but failed to identify the remaining strains, including the Lactobacillus crispatus (18), Lactobacillus mucosae (one), and Lactobacillus vaginalis (one) species. L. jensenii strains were distributed over two fingerprint clusters. The majority of samples was dominated by one (GTG)(5)-PCR type. The rep-PCR fingerprinting using the (GTG)(5) primer allowed straightforward identification of many, but not all, isolates. This method has been shown to be a useful tool for fast screening and grouping of vaginal lactobacilli, but its combination with another identification method is needed to obtain reliable identification results. In addition, Lactobacillus acidophilus was not shown to be the most common inhabitant of the female genital tract as generally assumed.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12027745
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20151021093950.0
007      
ta
008      
120817s2011 xr d f 000 0eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s12223-011-0006-4 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)21390569
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Švec, Pavel $7 xx0050849 $u Czech Collection of Microorganisms, Department of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno
245    10
$a (GTG)(5)-PCR fingerprinting of lactobacilli isolated from cervix of healthy women / $c P. Svec, I. Sedláček, M. Chrápavá, P. Vandamme
520    9_
$a A group of lactobacilli isolated from the cervix of 31 healthy women was characterized by (GTG)(5)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fingerprinting in order to evaluate this method for identification of vaginal lactobacilli. Obtained fingerprints were compared with profiles available in an in-house database of the CCM bacteria collection covering type and reference strains of multiple lactic acid bacteria including lactobacilli. Selected strains representing individual clusters were further identified by pheS gene sequencing. In total, six lactobacillus species were found among lactobacilli isolated from the cervix of healthy women. The (GTG)(5)-PCR method identified Lactobacillus gasseri (11 strains), Lactobacillus fermentum (one), and some of the Lactobacillus jensenii strains (eight out of 11), but failed to identify the remaining strains, including the Lactobacillus crispatus (18), Lactobacillus mucosae (one), and Lactobacillus vaginalis (one) species. L. jensenii strains were distributed over two fingerprint clusters. The majority of samples was dominated by one (GTG)(5)-PCR type. The rep-PCR fingerprinting using the (GTG)(5) primer allowed straightforward identification of many, but not all, isolates. This method has been shown to be a useful tool for fast screening and grouping of vaginal lactobacilli, but its combination with another identification method is needed to obtain reliable identification results. In addition, Lactobacillus acidophilus was not shown to be the most common inhabitant of the female genital tract as generally assumed.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a techniky typizace bakterií $7 D015373
650    _2
$a cervix uteri $x mikrobiologie $7 D002584
650    _2
$a DNA fingerprinting $x metody $7 D016172
650    _2
$a DNA primery $x genetika $7 D017931
650    _2
$a DNA bakterií $x genetika $7 D004269
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a Lactobacillus $x klasifikace $x genetika $x izolace a purifikace $7 D007778
650    _2
$a fylogeneze $7 D010802
650    _2
$a polymerázová řetězová reakce $x metody $7 D016133
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Sedláček, Ivo, $d 1958- $7 jx20040810004 $u Czech Collection of Microorganisms, Department of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno
700    1#
$a Chrápavá, Marika. $7 xx0239826 $u Valosun Inc., Brno
700    1_
$a Vandamme, P. $u Laboratory of Microbiology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
773    0_
$w MED00011005 $t Folia microbiologica $x 1874-9356 $g Roč. 56, č. 1 (2011), s. 80-83
856    41
$u http://link.springer.com/journal/volumesAndIssues/12223 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $y m $b online $z 0
990    __
$a 20120817 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20151021094144 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 949787 $s 785091
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2011 $b 56 $c 1 $d 80-83 $i 1874-9356 $m Folia microbiologica $n Folia microbiol. (Prague) $x MED00011005
LZP    __
$b NLK111 $a Pubmed-20120817/11/03

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options