-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
No association of promoter variations of HMOX1 and UGT1A1 genes with liver injury in chronic hepatitis C
P. Urbánek, M. Leníček, L. Muchová, I. Subhanová, L. Dušek, N. Kaspříková, P. Hrabal, R. Bruha, L. Vítek,
Jazyk angličtina Země Mexiko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Elsevier Open Access Journals
od 2002-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2002
PubMed
21911884
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- biopsie MeSH
- chronická hepatitida C enzymologie genetika patologie MeSH
- fenotyp MeSH
- frekvence genu MeSH
- genetická predispozice k nemoci MeSH
- genetická variace MeSH
- glukuronosyltransferasa genetika MeSH
- hemoxygenasa-1 genetika MeSH
- Hepacivirus genetika MeSH
- jaterní cirhóza enzymologie genetika patologie virologie MeSH
- játra enzymologie patologie virologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mikrosatelitní repetice MeSH
- promotorové oblasti (genetika) MeSH
- RNA virová krev MeSH
- studie případů a kontrol MeSH
- virová nálož MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
BACKGROUND: Heme oxygenase-1 (HMOX1) and bilirubin UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT1A1), both enzymes involved in bilirubin homeostasis, play an important role in oxidative stress defense. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of promoter variations of HMOX1 and UGT1A1 genes on the progression of fibrosis in patients chronically infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was performed on146 chronic HCV infection patients, plus 146 age- and sex-matched healthy subjects. The (GT)n and (TA)n dinucleotide variations in HMOX1 and UGT1A1 gene promoters, respectively, were determined by fragment analysis in all subjects. RESULTS: No differences were found in the frequencies of each particular allele of both genes, between HCV patients and a control group (p > 0.05). Furthermore, no association was detected (p > 0.05) between either the HMOX1 or the UGT1A1 promoter variants and the individual histological stages of liver disease in the HCV positive patients. Finally, no differences in the HMOX1 and UGT1A1 genotype prevalence rates were found between pre-cirrhotic and cirrhotic patients (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Based on our data, microsatellite variations in the HMOX1 and UGT1A1 genes are not likely to protect from progression of liver disease in patients with chronic hepatitis C.
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12028056
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20121206111607.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120817s2011 mx f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)21911884
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a mx
- 100 1_
- $a Urbánek, Petr $u Department of Internal Medicine, 1st. Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Central Military Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a No association of promoter variations of HMOX1 and UGT1A1 genes with liver injury in chronic hepatitis C / $c P. Urbánek, M. Leníček, L. Muchová, I. Subhanová, L. Dušek, N. Kaspříková, P. Hrabal, R. Bruha, L. Vítek,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Heme oxygenase-1 (HMOX1) and bilirubin UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT1A1), both enzymes involved in bilirubin homeostasis, play an important role in oxidative stress defense. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of promoter variations of HMOX1 and UGT1A1 genes on the progression of fibrosis in patients chronically infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was performed on146 chronic HCV infection patients, plus 146 age- and sex-matched healthy subjects. The (GT)n and (TA)n dinucleotide variations in HMOX1 and UGT1A1 gene promoters, respectively, were determined by fragment analysis in all subjects. RESULTS: No differences were found in the frequencies of each particular allele of both genes, between HCV patients and a control group (p > 0.05). Furthermore, no association was detected (p > 0.05) between either the HMOX1 or the UGT1A1 promoter variants and the individual histological stages of liver disease in the HCV positive patients. Finally, no differences in the HMOX1 and UGT1A1 genotype prevalence rates were found between pre-cirrhotic and cirrhotic patients (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Based on our data, microsatellite variations in the HMOX1 and UGT1A1 genes are not likely to protect from progression of liver disease in patients with chronic hepatitis C.
- 650 _2
- $a biopsie $7 D001706
- 650 _2
- $a studie případů a kontrol $7 D016022
- 650 _2
- $a frekvence genu $7 D005787
- 650 _2
- $a genetická predispozice k nemoci $7 D020022
- 650 _2
- $a genetická variace $7 D014644
- 650 _2
- $a glukuronosyltransferasa $x genetika $7 D014453
- 650 _2
- $a hemoxygenasa-1 $x genetika $7 D051547
- 650 _2
- $a Hepacivirus $x genetika $7 D016174
- 650 _2
- $a chronická hepatitida C $x enzymologie $x genetika $x patologie $7 D019698
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a játra $x enzymologie $x patologie $x virologie $7 D008099
- 650 _2
- $a jaterní cirhóza $x enzymologie $x genetika $x patologie $x virologie $7 D008103
- 650 _2
- $a mikrosatelitní repetice $7 D018895
- 650 _2
- $a fenotyp $7 D010641
- 650 _2
- $a promotorové oblasti (genetika) $7 D011401
- 650 _2
- $a RNA virová $x krev $7 D012367
- 650 _2
- $a virová nálož $7 D019562
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Leníček, Martin
- 700 1_
- $a Muchová, Lucie
- 700 1_
- $a Subhanová, Iva
- 700 1_
- $a Dušek, Ladislav
- 700 1_
- $a Kaspříková, Nikola
- 700 1_
- $a Hrabal, Petr
- 700 1_
- $a Bruha, Radan
- 700 1_
- $a Vítek, Libor
- 773 0_
- $w MED00172549 $t Annals of hepatology $x 1665-2681 $g Roč. 10, č. 4 (2011), s. 445-51
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21911884 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
- 990 __
- $a 20120817 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20121206111640 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 950098 $s 785402
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2011 $b 10 $c 4 $d 445-51 $i 1665-2681 $m Annals of hepatology $n Ann Hepatol $x MED00172549
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20120817/11/04