• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

MRI-based pre-planning in patients with cervical cancer treated with three-dimensional brachytherapy

M. Dolezel, K. Odrazka, J. Vanasek, T. Kohlova, T. Kroulik, K. Kudelka, D. Spitzer, M. Mrklovsky, M. Tichy, J. Zizka, L. Jalcova,

. 2011 ; 84 (1005) : 850-6.

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu hodnotící studie, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc12028105
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK British Institute of Radiology od 1928-01-01
Free Medical Journals od 2009 do Před 2 roky
Freely Accessible Science Journals od 2009-01-01 do Před 2 roky
Europe PubMed Central od 2009 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2008-01-01 do Před 1 rokem

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyse the feasibility and determine the benefits of MRI-based pre-planning with CT/MRI data fusion in patients with cervical cancer treated with radical radiotherapy. METHODS: Patients underwent MRI examination prior to external beam radiotherapy and prior to the first and fourth fraction of brachytherapy with applicators in place. Insertion of applicators at the radiology department was performed under paracervical anaesthesia. The benefit of MRI pre-planning was determined by comparing conventional treatment planning with dose specification to "point A" and dose specification to 90% of the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV D90). Tolerance of MRI evaluation with applicators, coverage of HR-CTV and dose-volume parameters for organs at risk (OAR) has been assessed in 42 brachytherapy procedures. RESULTS: Insertion of applicators at the radiology department was successful in all patients and there were no complications. The target dose was higher for MRI planning than for conventional planning (5.3 Gy vs 4.5 Gy). Maximum doses in the bladder and rectum were significantly lower (p<0.05) for MRI planning than for the conventional approach (6.49 Gy vs 7.45 Gy for bladder; 4.57 Gy vs 5.06 Gy for rectum). We found no correlation between the International Commission on Radiation Units (ICRU) point dose for OAR and the maximum dose in OAR. Nevertheless, a strong correlation between the maximum dose in OAR and the minimal dose in a volume of 2 cm(3) has been observed. CONCLUSION: MRI-based pre-planning with consecutive CT/MRI data fusion is feasible and safe, with the advantage of increasing the dose to the tumour and decreasing the dose to the organs at risk.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12028105
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20121001223722.0
007      
ta
008      
120817s2011 enk f 000 0#eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1259/bjr/75446993 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)21849368
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Doležel, Martin $7 xx0075943 $u Oncology Centre, Pardubice Regional Hospital, Pardubice, Czech Republic. dolezelm@email.cz
245    10
$a MRI-based pre-planning in patients with cervical cancer treated with three-dimensional brachytherapy / $c M. Dolezel, K. Odrazka, J. Vanasek, T. Kohlova, T. Kroulik, K. Kudelka, D. Spitzer, M. Mrklovsky, M. Tichy, J. Zizka, L. Jalcova,
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyse the feasibility and determine the benefits of MRI-based pre-planning with CT/MRI data fusion in patients with cervical cancer treated with radical radiotherapy. METHODS: Patients underwent MRI examination prior to external beam radiotherapy and prior to the first and fourth fraction of brachytherapy with applicators in place. Insertion of applicators at the radiology department was performed under paracervical anaesthesia. The benefit of MRI pre-planning was determined by comparing conventional treatment planning with dose specification to "point A" and dose specification to 90% of the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV D90). Tolerance of MRI evaluation with applicators, coverage of HR-CTV and dose-volume parameters for organs at risk (OAR) has been assessed in 42 brachytherapy procedures. RESULTS: Insertion of applicators at the radiology department was successful in all patients and there were no complications. The target dose was higher for MRI planning than for conventional planning (5.3 Gy vs 4.5 Gy). Maximum doses in the bladder and rectum were significantly lower (p<0.05) for MRI planning than for the conventional approach (6.49 Gy vs 7.45 Gy for bladder; 4.57 Gy vs 5.06 Gy for rectum). We found no correlation between the International Commission on Radiation Units (ICRU) point dose for OAR and the maximum dose in OAR. Nevertheless, a strong correlation between the maximum dose in OAR and the minimal dose in a volume of 2 cm(3) has been observed. CONCLUSION: MRI-based pre-planning with consecutive CT/MRI data fusion is feasible and safe, with the advantage of increasing the dose to the tumour and decreasing the dose to the organs at risk.
650    _2
$a brachyterapie $x metody $7 D001918
650    _2
$a studie proveditelnosti $7 D005240
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $7 D008279
650    _2
$a kritické orgány $7 D058958
650    _2
$a celková dávka radioterapie $7 D011879
650    _2
$a plánování radioterapie pomocí počítače $x metody $7 D011880
650    _2
$a rektum $x patologie $x účinky záření $7 D012007
650    _2
$a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $7 D014057
650    _2
$a močový měchýř $x patologie $x účinky záření $7 D001743
650    _2
$a nádory děložního čípku $x diagnóza $x patologie $x radioterapie $7 D002583
655    _2
$a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Odrážka, Karel $7 mzk2002148290
700    1_
$a Vanasek, J
700    1_
$a Kohlova, T
700    1_
$a Kroulik, T
700    1_
$a Kudelka, K
700    1_
$a Spitzer, D
700    1_
$a Mrklovský, Milan $7 xx0104797
700    1_
$a Tichy, M
700    1_
$a Žižka, J
700    1_
$a Jalcova, L
773    0_
$w MED00000884 $t The British journal of radiology $x 1748-880X $g Roč. 84, č. 1005 (2011), s. 850-6
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21849368 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
990    __
$a 20120817 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20121001223919 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 950147 $s 785451
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2011 $b 84 $c 1005 $d 850-6 $i 1748-880X $m British journal of radiology $n Br J Radiol $x MED00000884
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20120817/11/04

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...