-
Something wrong with this record ?
MRI-based pre-planning in patients with cervical cancer treated with three-dimensional brachytherapy
M. Dolezel, K. Odrazka, J. Vanasek, T. Kohlova, T. Kroulik, K. Kudelka, D. Spitzer, M. Mrklovsky, M. Tichy, J. Zizka, L. Jalcova,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Evaluation Study, Journal Article
NLK
British Institute of Radiology
from 1928-01-01
Free Medical Journals
from 2009 to 2 years ago
Europe PubMed Central
from 2009 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2008-01-01 to 1 year ago
PubMed
21849368
DOI
10.1259/bjr/75446993
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Brachytherapy methods MeSH
- Radiotherapy Dosage MeSH
- Organs at Risk MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging MeSH
- Urinary Bladder pathology radiation effects MeSH
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms diagnosis pathology radiotherapy MeSH
- Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted methods MeSH
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed MeSH
- Rectum pathology radiation effects MeSH
- Feasibility Studies MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Evaluation Study MeSH
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyse the feasibility and determine the benefits of MRI-based pre-planning with CT/MRI data fusion in patients with cervical cancer treated with radical radiotherapy. METHODS: Patients underwent MRI examination prior to external beam radiotherapy and prior to the first and fourth fraction of brachytherapy with applicators in place. Insertion of applicators at the radiology department was performed under paracervical anaesthesia. The benefit of MRI pre-planning was determined by comparing conventional treatment planning with dose specification to "point A" and dose specification to 90% of the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV D90). Tolerance of MRI evaluation with applicators, coverage of HR-CTV and dose-volume parameters for organs at risk (OAR) has been assessed in 42 brachytherapy procedures. RESULTS: Insertion of applicators at the radiology department was successful in all patients and there were no complications. The target dose was higher for MRI planning than for conventional planning (5.3 Gy vs 4.5 Gy). Maximum doses in the bladder and rectum were significantly lower (p<0.05) for MRI planning than for the conventional approach (6.49 Gy vs 7.45 Gy for bladder; 4.57 Gy vs 5.06 Gy for rectum). We found no correlation between the International Commission on Radiation Units (ICRU) point dose for OAR and the maximum dose in OAR. Nevertheless, a strong correlation between the maximum dose in OAR and the minimal dose in a volume of 2 cm(3) has been observed. CONCLUSION: MRI-based pre-planning with consecutive CT/MRI data fusion is feasible and safe, with the advantage of increasing the dose to the tumour and decreasing the dose to the organs at risk.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12028105
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20121001223722.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120817s2011 enk f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1259/bjr/75446993 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)21849368
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Doležel, Martin $7 xx0075943 $u Oncology Centre, Pardubice Regional Hospital, Pardubice, Czech Republic. dolezelm@email.cz
- 245 10
- $a MRI-based pre-planning in patients with cervical cancer treated with three-dimensional brachytherapy / $c M. Dolezel, K. Odrazka, J. Vanasek, T. Kohlova, T. Kroulik, K. Kudelka, D. Spitzer, M. Mrklovsky, M. Tichy, J. Zizka, L. Jalcova,
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyse the feasibility and determine the benefits of MRI-based pre-planning with CT/MRI data fusion in patients with cervical cancer treated with radical radiotherapy. METHODS: Patients underwent MRI examination prior to external beam radiotherapy and prior to the first and fourth fraction of brachytherapy with applicators in place. Insertion of applicators at the radiology department was performed under paracervical anaesthesia. The benefit of MRI pre-planning was determined by comparing conventional treatment planning with dose specification to "point A" and dose specification to 90% of the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV D90). Tolerance of MRI evaluation with applicators, coverage of HR-CTV and dose-volume parameters for organs at risk (OAR) has been assessed in 42 brachytherapy procedures. RESULTS: Insertion of applicators at the radiology department was successful in all patients and there were no complications. The target dose was higher for MRI planning than for conventional planning (5.3 Gy vs 4.5 Gy). Maximum doses in the bladder and rectum were significantly lower (p<0.05) for MRI planning than for the conventional approach (6.49 Gy vs 7.45 Gy for bladder; 4.57 Gy vs 5.06 Gy for rectum). We found no correlation between the International Commission on Radiation Units (ICRU) point dose for OAR and the maximum dose in OAR. Nevertheless, a strong correlation between the maximum dose in OAR and the minimal dose in a volume of 2 cm(3) has been observed. CONCLUSION: MRI-based pre-planning with consecutive CT/MRI data fusion is feasible and safe, with the advantage of increasing the dose to the tumour and decreasing the dose to the organs at risk.
- 650 _2
- $a brachyterapie $x metody $7 D001918
- 650 _2
- $a studie proveditelnosti $7 D005240
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $7 D008279
- 650 _2
- $a kritické orgány $7 D058958
- 650 _2
- $a celková dávka radioterapie $7 D011879
- 650 _2
- $a plánování radioterapie pomocí počítače $x metody $7 D011880
- 650 _2
- $a rektum $x patologie $x účinky záření $7 D012007
- 650 _2
- $a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $7 D014057
- 650 _2
- $a močový měchýř $x patologie $x účinky záření $7 D001743
- 650 _2
- $a nádory děložního čípku $x diagnóza $x patologie $x radioterapie $7 D002583
- 655 _2
- $a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Odrážka, Karel $7 mzk2002148290
- 700 1_
- $a Vanasek, J
- 700 1_
- $a Kohlova, T
- 700 1_
- $a Kroulik, T
- 700 1_
- $a Kudelka, K
- 700 1_
- $a Spitzer, D
- 700 1_
- $a Mrklovský, Milan $7 xx0104797
- 700 1_
- $a Tichy, M
- 700 1_
- $a Žižka, J
- 700 1_
- $a Jalcova, L
- 773 0_
- $w MED00000884 $t The British journal of radiology $x 1748-880X $g Roč. 84, č. 1005 (2011), s. 850-6
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21849368 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
- 990 __
- $a 20120817 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20121001223919 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 950147 $s 785451
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2011 $b 84 $c 1005 $d 850-6 $i 1748-880X $m British journal of radiology $n Br J Radiol $x MED00000884
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20120817/11/04