-
Something wrong with this record ?
Retransplantace u nemocných s mnohočetným myelomem (MM) relabujícím po první autologní transplantaci (Pilotní studie CMG)
[Retransplantation in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) relapsing after the first autologous transplantation (A pilot study of Czech myeloma group)]
Křivanová Andrea, Hájek Roman, Adam Zdeněk, Krejčí Marta, Büchler Tomáš, Scudla Vlastimil, Bačovský Jaroslav, Vytřasová Markéta, Koza Vladimír, Schűtzová Miroslava, Svobodník Adam, Mayer Jiří, Vorlíček Jiří
Language Czech Country Czech Republic
- Keywords
- udržovací léčba,
- MeSH
- Transplantation, Autologous utilization MeSH
- Diphosphonates therapeutic use MeSH
- Cyclophosphamide therapeutic use MeSH
- Dexamethasone therapeutic use MeSH
- Doxorubicin therapeutic use MeSH
- Financing, Organized MeSH
- Interleukin-2 therapeutic use MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Melphalan therapeutic use MeSH
- Multiple Myeloma therapy MeSH
- Retreatment methods trends utilization MeSH
- Pilot Projects MeSH
- Recurrence MeSH
- Secondary Prevention MeSH
- Statistics as Topic MeSH
- Thalidomide therapeutic use MeSH
- Vincristine therapeutic use MeSH
- Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
Background: High doses of chemotherapy followed by autologous transplantation has become widespreadly indicated as upfront therapy for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) during last decade, with very good tolerance and low mortality (2-3%).Therapy of relapsing MM is still considered experimental. Design of study: The principle of T2 model is repeated transplantation therapy with testing different experimental approaches in patients with MM relapsing/progressing after the 1st autologous transplantation (AT). The patients (pts) are treated with ″the same + something more″ - same or very similar induction and reinduction treatment, same myeloablative regimen in the first and the second transplantation and a different maintenance, experimental therapy after the 2nd transplantation. The evaluation of the results of each therapeutic approach uses intra-individual analysis – the comparison of event free survival I (EFS I) (after the 1st AT) and EFS II (after the 2nd transplantation) in one patient. In T2 model is EFS I and EFS II compared in one patient, therefore the inter-individual differences are excluded. Subjects: 20 pts with relapsing/progressing MM after the 1st AT were included in the pilot study between January 1997 and May 2001. Methods and results: Pts were matched to the following groups of experimental therapy: autologous transplantation with IL-2 activated PBSC-10 pts (50%), pamidronate– 4 pts (20%), mini-allogeneic transplantation –2 pts (10%), thalidomide –3pts (15%), consolidation chemotherapy CED- 1 pt (5%). A sensitivity to reinduction chemotherapy C-VAD (4x) was more than 90%, the response to the 2nd transplantation acording to the 1st one was in 45 % better (9 pts), in 35% same (7 pts) and in 20 % worse (4 pts). The toxicity of the 1st and second transplantation was similar and usually did not exceed gr. II (SWOG criteria), there were no significant differences instead of clinically irrelevant hematotoxicity. Transplant-related mortality was 5% (1/20). In 15 pts MM had relapsed till 31st May 2001 (15/20). 5 pts have achieved prolongation of EFS II vs EFS I, 2 in IL-2 activated graft group, 1 in pamidronate group and 2 in allogeneic transplantation. Completed data from the analysis of the first – IL-2 group are listed here, in 20% pts (2/10) was EFS II > EFS I, curative effect was not confirmed. In the whole group median of EFS I was 15,2 months, median of EFS II was 9,9 months, median of overall survival (OS) was 62,8 months, 95% (19/20) were allive (till 31st May 2001) . Conclusions: Repeated transplantation is one of the most powerful approaches in treatment of relapsing MM; toxicity is acceptable, also engraftment is similar to the 1st AT. Testing of new perspective approaches by T2 model may bring a fundamental benefit, although our first results were negative. Key words: multiple myeloma, autologous stem cell transplantation
Centrum biostatistiky a analýz Lékařské a Přírodovědecké fakutly MU v Brně
Hematologické oddělení FN Plzeň
Retransplantation in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) relapsing after the first autologous transplantation (A pilot study of Czech myeloma group)
Obsahuje 5 tabulek
Bibliography, etc.Literatura
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12030799
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160628161649.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120925s2002 xr d f 000 0cze||
- 009
- AR
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2 $b cze
- 041 0_
- $a cze $b eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Křivanová, Andrea $7 xx0083592 $u Interní hematoonkologická klinika FN Brno
- 245 10
- $a Retransplantace u nemocných s mnohočetným myelomem (MM) relabujícím po první autologní transplantaci (Pilotní studie CMG) / $c Křivanová Andrea, Hájek Roman, Adam Zdeněk, Krejčí Marta, Büchler Tomáš, Scudla Vlastimil, Bačovský Jaroslav, Vytřasová Markéta, Koza Vladimír, Schűtzová Miroslava, Svobodník Adam, Mayer Jiří, Vorlíček Jiří
- 246 31
- $a Retransplantation in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) relapsing after the first autologous transplantation (A pilot study of Czech myeloma group)
- 500 __
- $a Obsahuje 5 tabulek
- 504 __
- $a Literatura $b 20
- 520 9_
- $a Background: High doses of chemotherapy followed by autologous transplantation has become widespreadly indicated as upfront therapy for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) during last decade, with very good tolerance and low mortality (2-3%).Therapy of relapsing MM is still considered experimental. Design of study: The principle of T2 model is repeated transplantation therapy with testing different experimental approaches in patients with MM relapsing/progressing after the 1st autologous transplantation (AT). The patients (pts) are treated with ″the same + something more″ - same or very similar induction and reinduction treatment, same myeloablative regimen in the first and the second transplantation and a different maintenance, experimental therapy after the 2nd transplantation. The evaluation of the results of each therapeutic approach uses intra-individual analysis – the comparison of event free survival I (EFS I) (after the 1st AT) and EFS II (after the 2nd transplantation) in one patient. In T2 model is EFS I and EFS II compared in one patient, therefore the inter-individual differences are excluded. Subjects: 20 pts with relapsing/progressing MM after the 1st AT were included in the pilot study between January 1997 and May 2001. Methods and results: Pts were matched to the following groups of experimental therapy: autologous transplantation with IL-2 activated PBSC-10 pts (50%), pamidronate– 4 pts (20%), mini-allogeneic transplantation –2 pts (10%), thalidomide –3pts (15%), consolidation chemotherapy CED- 1 pt (5%). A sensitivity to reinduction chemotherapy C-VAD (4x) was more than 90%, the response to the 2nd transplantation acording to the 1st one was in 45 % better (9 pts), in 35% same (7 pts) and in 20 % worse (4 pts). The toxicity of the 1st and second transplantation was similar and usually did not exceed gr. II (SWOG criteria), there were no significant differences instead of clinically irrelevant hematotoxicity. Transplant-related mortality was 5% (1/20). In 15 pts MM had relapsed till 31st May 2001 (15/20). 5 pts have achieved prolongation of EFS II vs EFS I, 2 in IL-2 activated graft group, 1 in pamidronate group and 2 in allogeneic transplantation. Completed data from the analysis of the first – IL-2 group are listed here, in 20% pts (2/10) was EFS II > EFS I, curative effect was not confirmed. In the whole group median of EFS I was 15,2 months, median of EFS II was 9,9 months, median of overall survival (OS) was 62,8 months, 95% (19/20) were allive (till 31st May 2001) . Conclusions: Repeated transplantation is one of the most powerful approaches in treatment of relapsing MM; toxicity is acceptable, also engraftment is similar to the 1st AT. Testing of new perspective approaches by T2 model may bring a fundamental benefit, although our first results were negative. Key words: multiple myeloma, autologous stem cell transplantation
- 650 _2
- $a mnohočetný myelom $x terapie $7 D009101
- 650 _2
- $a recidiva $7 D012008
- 650 _2
- $a autologní transplantace $x využití $7 D014182
- 650 _2
- $a opakovaná terapie $x metody $x trendy $x využití $7 D019233
- 650 _2
- $a dexamethason $x terapeutické užití $7 D003907
- 650 _2
- $a thalidomid $x terapeutické užití $7 D013792
- 650 _2
- $a vinkristin $x terapeutické užití $7 D014750
- 650 _2
- $a doxorubicin $x terapeutické užití $7 D004317
- 650 _2
- $a interleukin-2 $x terapeutické užití $7 D007376
- 650 _2
- $a cyklofosfamid $x terapeutické užití $7 D003520
- 650 _2
- $a bisfosfonáty $x terapeutické užití $7 D004164
- 650 _2
- $a melfalan $x terapeutické užití $7 D008558
- 650 _2
- $a výsledky a postupy - zhodnocení (zdravotní péče) $7 D010043
- 650 _2
- $a statistika jako téma $7 D013223
- 650 _2
- $a pilotní projekty $7 D010865
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a financování organizované $7 D005381
- 650 _2
- $a sekundární prevence $7 D055502
- 653 00
- $a udržovací léčba
- 700 1_
- $a Hájek, Roman, $d 1964- $7 nlk20000083645 $u Interní hematoonkologická klinika FN Brno
- 700 1_
- $a Adam, Zdeněk, $d 1953- $7 jn19981000018 $u Interní hematoonkologická klinika FN Brno
- 700 1_
- $a Krejčí, Marta, $d 1969- $7 jx20080512017 $u Interní hematoonkologická klinika FN Brno
- 700 1_
- $a Büchler, Tomáš, $7 xx0096851 $u Interní hematoonkologická klinika FN Brno $d 1974-
- 700 1_
- $a Ščudla, Vlastimil, $d 1946- $7 jn20000402953 $u Interní klinika FN Olomouc
- 700 1_
- $a Bačovský, Jaroslav $7 xx0053311 $u Interní klinika FN Olomouc
- 700 1_
- $a Vytřasová, Markéta, $d 1975- $7 xx0014281 $u Interní klinika FN Olomouc
- 700 1_
- $a Koza, Vladimír, $d 1954-2012 $7 nlk19990073416 $u Hematologické oddělení FN Plzeň
- 700 1_
- $a Schützová, Miroslava $7 xx0123334 $u Hematologické oddělení FN Plzeň
- 700 1_
- $a Svobodník, Adam, $d 1975- $7 xx0026812 $u Centrum biostatistiky a analýz Lékařské a Přírodovědecké fakutly MU v Brně
- 700 1_
- $a Mayer, Jiří, $d 1960- $7 nlk20000083651 $u Interní hematoonkologická klinika FN Brno
- 700 1_
- $a Vorlíček, Jiří, $d 1944- $7 jn20000402598 $u Interní hematoonkologická klinika FN Brno
- 773 0_
- $t Klinická onkologie. Mnohočetný myelom – současné léčebné metody $x 0862-495X $g Roč. 15, Suppl. 2002 (2002), s. 31-35 $w MED00011030
- 773 0_
- $t Mnohočetný myelom $x 0862-495X $g Roč. 15, Suppl. 2002 (2002), s. 31-35 $w MED00114583
- 856 41
- $u https://www.linkos.cz/files/klinicka-onkologie/38/797.pdf $y plný text volně přístupný
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b B 1665 $c 656 $y 2 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20120919151754 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160628161835 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 953083 $s 788218
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2002 $b 15 $c Suppl. 2002 $d 31-35 $i 0862-495X $m Klinická onkologie $n Klin. onkol. $o Mnohočetný myelom – současné léčebné metody $x MED00011030
- BMC __
- $a 2002 $b 15 $c Suppl. 2002 $d 31-35 $i 0862-495X $m Mnohočetný myelom $x MED00114583
- LZP __
- $a 2012-18/mkal