Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Medical consultations and the sharing of medical images involving spinal injury over mobile phone networks

M. Filip, P. Linzer, F. Šámal, J. Tesař, R. Herzig, D. Školoudík

. 2012 ; 30 (6) : 961-965.

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 2003-01-01 to 2 months ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 2012-09-01 to 2015-08-31
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) from 2003-01-01 to 2 months ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 2003-01-01 to 2 months ago

BACKGROUND: The transmission of medical images and other data over mobile phone networks may facilitate remote medical consultations between neurosurgeons and regional hospitals treating spinal injury patients. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of mobile phone consultations with standard hospital workstation consultations in spinal injury patients. METHODS: The images were exported over the Internet from surrounding local hospitals through the Picture Archiving and Communication System, in DICOM III format, to the central hospital server. The xVision browser was used to view the acquired images on a standard workstation. The data were also exported to the secured hospital Web server IIS60 and converted to JPEG format to enable remote physician access and consultation. The remote consulting physician connected to this server by mobile phone using the phone's Internet browser. A second physician, blind to the mobile phone results, evaluated the same images at a workstation in the hospital. The results of the mobile phone consultations were compared with the results from standard workstation consultations. RESULTS: There was no difference in the quality of spinal computed tomographic/magnetic resonance images viewed on the phone screen compared with on the workstation. More importantly, the final diagnoses made by mobile phone did not differ from those made by workstation consultations. A transfer to the department of neurosurgery was required after consultation in 11 patients. CONCLUSION: Mobile phone consultations for patients with spinal injuries was as effective as workstation consultations. Mobile phone consultations can increase the expertise available to regional hospitals, which are often the first responders to medical emergencies.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12034920
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20160805153944.0
007      
ta
008      
121023s2012 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.05.007 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)21795006
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Filip, Michal, $d 1959- $7 xx0037837 $u Department of Neurosurgery, Bata Hospital, CZ-76001, Zlín, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Medical consultations and the sharing of medical images involving spinal injury over mobile phone networks / $c M. Filip, P. Linzer, F. Šámal, J. Tesař, R. Herzig, D. Školoudík
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The transmission of medical images and other data over mobile phone networks may facilitate remote medical consultations between neurosurgeons and regional hospitals treating spinal injury patients. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of mobile phone consultations with standard hospital workstation consultations in spinal injury patients. METHODS: The images were exported over the Internet from surrounding local hospitals through the Picture Archiving and Communication System, in DICOM III format, to the central hospital server. The xVision browser was used to view the acquired images on a standard workstation. The data were also exported to the secured hospital Web server IIS60 and converted to JPEG format to enable remote physician access and consultation. The remote consulting physician connected to this server by mobile phone using the phone's Internet browser. A second physician, blind to the mobile phone results, evaluated the same images at a workstation in the hospital. The results of the mobile phone consultations were compared with the results from standard workstation consultations. RESULTS: There was no difference in the quality of spinal computed tomographic/magnetic resonance images viewed on the phone screen compared with on the workstation. More importantly, the final diagnoses made by mobile phone did not differ from those made by workstation consultations. A transfer to the department of neurosurgery was required after consultation in 11 patients. CONCLUSION: Mobile phone consultations for patients with spinal injuries was as effective as workstation consultations. Mobile phone consultations can increase the expertise available to regional hospitals, which are often the first responders to medical emergencies.
650    _2
$a mobilní telefon $7 D040421
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a poranění páteře $x diagnóza $x radiografie $7 D013124
650    _2
$a teleradiologie $x metody $7 D019112
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Linzer, Petr. $7 xx0242115 $u Department of Neurosurgery, Bata Hospital, CZ-76001, Zlín, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Šámal, Filip, $d 1973- $7 xx0211243 $u Department of Neurosurgery, Bata Hospital, CZ-76001, Zlín, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Tesař, Jiří $7 xx0140093 $u Department of Radiology, Bata Hospital, CZ-76001, Zlín, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Herzig, Roman, $d 1968- $7 mzk2007411122 $u Department of Neurology, Palacký University Medical School and University Hospital, CZ-77520, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Školoudík, David, $d 1972- $7 xx0020614 $u Department of Neurology, Palacký University Medical School and University Hospital, CZ-77520, Olomouc, Czech Republic; Department of Neurology, Ostrava University Medical School and University Hospital, CZ-70852, Ostrava, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00000245 $t The American journal of emergency medicine $x 1532-8171 $g Roč. 30, č. 6 (2012), s. 961-965
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21795006 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20121023 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20160805154218 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 956930 $s 792417
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2012 $b 30 $c 6 $d 961-965 $i 1532-8171 $m American journal of emergency medicine $n Am J Emerg Med $x MED00000245
LZP    __
$b NLK112 $a Pubmed-20121023

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...