• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Chemically enhanced phytoextraction of risk elements from a contaminated agricultural soil using Zea mays and Triticum aestivum: performance and metal mobilization over a three year period

RW. Neugschwandtner, P. Tlustos, M. Komárek, J. Száková, L. Jakoubková,

. 2012 ; 14 (8) : 754-71.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc13000607

Enhanced phytoextraction using EDTA for the remediation of an agricultural soil contaminated with less mobile risk elements Cd and Pb originating from smelting activities in Príbram (Czech Republic) was assessed on the laboratory and the field scale. EDTA was applied to the first years crop Zea mays. Metal mobilization and metal uptake by the plants in the soil were monitored for two additional years when Triticum aestivum was planted. The application ofEDTA effectively increased water-soluble Cd and Pb concentrations in the soil. These concentrations decreased over time. Anyhow, increased concentrations could be still observed in the third experimental year indicating a low possibility of groundwater pollution after the addition of EDTA during and also after the enhanced phytoextraction process under prevailing climatic conditions. EDTA-applications caused phytotoxicity and thereby decreased biomass production and increased Cd and Pb uptake by the plants. Phytoextraction efficiency and phytoextraction potential were too low for Cd and Pb phytoextraction in the field in a reasonable time frame (as less than one-tenth of a percent of total Cd and Pb could be removed). This strongly indicates that EDTA-enhanced phytoextraction as implemented in this study is not a suitable remediation technique for risk metal contaminated soils.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc13000607
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20130110101053.0
007      
ta
008      
130108s2012 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1080/15226514.2011.619231 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)22908642
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Neugschwandtner, Reinhard W $u Department of Agro-Environmental Chemistry and Plant Nutrition, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká, Prague-Suchdol, Czech Republic. reinhard.neugschwandtner@boku.ac.at
245    10
$a Chemically enhanced phytoextraction of risk elements from a contaminated agricultural soil using Zea mays and Triticum aestivum: performance and metal mobilization over a three year period / $c RW. Neugschwandtner, P. Tlustos, M. Komárek, J. Száková, L. Jakoubková,
520    9_
$a Enhanced phytoextraction using EDTA for the remediation of an agricultural soil contaminated with less mobile risk elements Cd and Pb originating from smelting activities in Príbram (Czech Republic) was assessed on the laboratory and the field scale. EDTA was applied to the first years crop Zea mays. Metal mobilization and metal uptake by the plants in the soil were monitored for two additional years when Triticum aestivum was planted. The application ofEDTA effectively increased water-soluble Cd and Pb concentrations in the soil. These concentrations decreased over time. Anyhow, increased concentrations could be still observed in the third experimental year indicating a low possibility of groundwater pollution after the addition of EDTA during and also after the enhanced phytoextraction process under prevailing climatic conditions. EDTA-applications caused phytotoxicity and thereby decreased biomass production and increased Cd and Pb uptake by the plants. Phytoextraction efficiency and phytoextraction potential were too low for Cd and Pb phytoextraction in the field in a reasonable time frame (as less than one-tenth of a percent of total Cd and Pb could be removed). This strongly indicates that EDTA-enhanced phytoextraction as implemented in this study is not a suitable remediation technique for risk metal contaminated soils.
650    _2
$a zemědělství $7 D000383
650    _2
$a biodegradace $7 D001673
650    _2
$a biomasa $7 D018533
650    _2
$a kovy $x chemie $x metabolismus $7 D008670
650    _2
$a půda $x chemie $7 D012987
650    _2
$a látky znečišťující půdu $x chemie $x metabolismus $7 D012989
650    _2
$a časové faktory $7 D013997
650    _2
$a pšenice $x chemie $x metabolismus $7 D014908
650    _2
$a kukuřice setá $x chemie $x metabolismus $7 D003313
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Tlustos, Pavel
700    1_
$a Komárek, Michael
700    1_
$a Száková, Jirina
700    1_
$a Jakoubková, Lucie
773    0_
$w MED00176222 $t International journal of phytoremediation $x 1522-6514 $g Roč. 14, č. 8 (2012), s. 754-71
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22908642 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20130108 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20130110101159 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 963389 $s 798771
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2012 $b 14 $c 8 $d 754-71 $i 1522-6514 $m International journal of phytoremediation $n Int. j. phytoremediat. $x MED00176222
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20130108

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace