-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Chemically enhanced phytoextraction of risk elements from a contaminated agricultural soil using Zea mays and Triticum aestivum: performance and metal mobilization over a three year period
RW. Neugschwandtner, P. Tlustos, M. Komárek, J. Száková, L. Jakoubková,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- biodegradace MeSH
- biomasa MeSH
- časové faktory MeSH
- kovy chemie metabolismus MeSH
- kukuřice setá chemie metabolismus MeSH
- látky znečišťující půdu chemie metabolismus MeSH
- pšenice chemie metabolismus MeSH
- půda chemie MeSH
- zemědělství MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Enhanced phytoextraction using EDTA for the remediation of an agricultural soil contaminated with less mobile risk elements Cd and Pb originating from smelting activities in Príbram (Czech Republic) was assessed on the laboratory and the field scale. EDTA was applied to the first years crop Zea mays. Metal mobilization and metal uptake by the plants in the soil were monitored for two additional years when Triticum aestivum was planted. The application ofEDTA effectively increased water-soluble Cd and Pb concentrations in the soil. These concentrations decreased over time. Anyhow, increased concentrations could be still observed in the third experimental year indicating a low possibility of groundwater pollution after the addition of EDTA during and also after the enhanced phytoextraction process under prevailing climatic conditions. EDTA-applications caused phytotoxicity and thereby decreased biomass production and increased Cd and Pb uptake by the plants. Phytoextraction efficiency and phytoextraction potential were too low for Cd and Pb phytoextraction in the field in a reasonable time frame (as less than one-tenth of a percent of total Cd and Pb could be removed). This strongly indicates that EDTA-enhanced phytoextraction as implemented in this study is not a suitable remediation technique for risk metal contaminated soils.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc13000607
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20130110101053.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 130108s2012 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1080/15226514.2011.619231 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)22908642
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Neugschwandtner, Reinhard W $u Department of Agro-Environmental Chemistry and Plant Nutrition, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká, Prague-Suchdol, Czech Republic. reinhard.neugschwandtner@boku.ac.at
- 245 10
- $a Chemically enhanced phytoextraction of risk elements from a contaminated agricultural soil using Zea mays and Triticum aestivum: performance and metal mobilization over a three year period / $c RW. Neugschwandtner, P. Tlustos, M. Komárek, J. Száková, L. Jakoubková,
- 520 9_
- $a Enhanced phytoextraction using EDTA for the remediation of an agricultural soil contaminated with less mobile risk elements Cd and Pb originating from smelting activities in Príbram (Czech Republic) was assessed on the laboratory and the field scale. EDTA was applied to the first years crop Zea mays. Metal mobilization and metal uptake by the plants in the soil were monitored for two additional years when Triticum aestivum was planted. The application ofEDTA effectively increased water-soluble Cd and Pb concentrations in the soil. These concentrations decreased over time. Anyhow, increased concentrations could be still observed in the third experimental year indicating a low possibility of groundwater pollution after the addition of EDTA during and also after the enhanced phytoextraction process under prevailing climatic conditions. EDTA-applications caused phytotoxicity and thereby decreased biomass production and increased Cd and Pb uptake by the plants. Phytoextraction efficiency and phytoextraction potential were too low for Cd and Pb phytoextraction in the field in a reasonable time frame (as less than one-tenth of a percent of total Cd and Pb could be removed). This strongly indicates that EDTA-enhanced phytoextraction as implemented in this study is not a suitable remediation technique for risk metal contaminated soils.
- 650 _2
- $a zemědělství $7 D000383
- 650 _2
- $a biodegradace $7 D001673
- 650 _2
- $a biomasa $7 D018533
- 650 _2
- $a kovy $x chemie $x metabolismus $7 D008670
- 650 _2
- $a půda $x chemie $7 D012987
- 650 _2
- $a látky znečišťující půdu $x chemie $x metabolismus $7 D012989
- 650 _2
- $a časové faktory $7 D013997
- 650 _2
- $a pšenice $x chemie $x metabolismus $7 D014908
- 650 _2
- $a kukuřice setá $x chemie $x metabolismus $7 D003313
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Tlustos, Pavel
- 700 1_
- $a Komárek, Michael
- 700 1_
- $a Száková, Jirina
- 700 1_
- $a Jakoubková, Lucie
- 773 0_
- $w MED00176222 $t International journal of phytoremediation $x 1522-6514 $g Roč. 14, č. 8 (2012), s. 754-71
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22908642 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20130108 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20130110101159 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 963389 $s 798771
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2012 $b 14 $c 8 $d 754-71 $i 1522-6514 $m International journal of phytoremediation $n Int. j. phytoremediat. $x MED00176222
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20130108